Connect with us

September 12, 2011

Published

on

I wrote a piece on September 15, 2001, as downtown Manhattan was engulfed in flames, fear and dust, panicked about the notion of seeking revenge by targeting the wrong people. I was thinking of innocent Afghanistan citizens who were already targets of the Taliban, who would likely bear the brunt. I hadn’t even contemplated Iraq.

What changed for me permanently on 9/11 was magnitude. I couldn’t comprehend the damage or loss of life from the first tower as it was hit, and then the second, and then the collapse, of the first, and then the second. Sure there was Hiroshima, but that was before my time. And I didn’t watch it live on television.

By that point what happened to the Pentagon and in a Pennsylvanian field was almost collateral damage – a sideshow away from the main feature. The notion that a hijacked commercial plane flying into the Pentagon seemed trivial was simply a result of the magnitude of what had happened in Manhattan. That the apparent heroics of Mark Bingham and others who brought down Flight 93 could be so easily relegated to an afterthought unless I actively force myself to consider what happened, and what could have.

The article I wrote was a desperate plea to take a step back. A foreboding prediction of what might otherwise become, which came true far worse and much quicker than I had imagined.

Timing and our capacity to heal wounds – both physiological and psychological — plays a significant role in how we respond to tragedy and how we recalibrate our world view and human understanding. The notion of “too soon” applied to comedians that use humor or artists that use their craft to laugh or comment on something that is still raw is the first step in permission to heal.

On the first anniversary of 9/11, I produced a piece called “Things Go Better,” depicting the twin towers as giant Coca Cola bottles looming with vaguely comforting familiarly behind the Statue of Liberty. An unmistakable, globally recognized icon of American brand power and reach. Fused with the fallen symbols of America’s economic might. Fragile, vulnerable made of glass, easily crushed. The response from many – disgust, vitriolic messages and threatening warnings – was as much a response to the timing of the piece as it was to its content and message. The deeper truth was what proved more upsetting. That it was just a matter of time before 9/11 became a cheap, gaudy commoditization of tragedy to be packaged, wrapped in jingoism and paranoia, and exploited to feed our consumerist obsession and stoke our fear. A subconscious foreboding that the blatant message that Osama Bin Laden sought to visually depict as America’s economic downfall was not simply a metaphor, and would become, and since has, a reality.

On the second anniversary of 9/11 I produced a piece called Phoenix Rising, the identical landscape as the first, except that the Statue of Liberty wore a gas mask, her outstretched arm like a Sig Heil salute. The once proud towers morphed and twisted into a swastika. Perhaps more misunderstood than any piece I’ve done (and for which I bear responsibility) the image was a warning. We were already heading that way. Godwin’s law renders the reference of Nazis or Hitler out of bounds in the pursuit of consensus or intelligent debate, but when the comparisons are so stark, why not?

The passage of the newspeaky Patriot Act that made emergency powers commonplace and threatens the very tenets of democracy, that fundamental extremist terrorists abhor, which continue. The denial of habeus corpus and our extraordinary rendition program. An ironic exercise in which we “extradite” detainees to countries like Egypt (although that now remains to be seen), where they can be tortured legally, because we supposedly don’t. (And of course, when we do, we pretend we didn’t really, and “look forward” instead.) America doesn’t torture so how can we prosecute ourselves for it?

The conflation of the twin towers with a symbol so universally reviled (except for those who hate a black president more than they desire economic relief) produced the same vile, ugly, threatening response. The first year was “too soon” for any symbols, even proudly American ones. The second “too soon” for iconic associations like swastikas designed as a warning to refrain from becoming something different. Phoenix rising from the ashes was a call to remember what was once valued, not a comment on who we had already become — or were fast becoming.

And so now, ten years later, having seen a new generation, who were too young to experience 9/11, dance in the streets at the death of Bin Laden – orchestrated by a Commander in Chief who put an enormous amount at stake for only a momentary boost to his approval ratings, without any understanding as to what else we lost that day, or how similar the dancing in the streets looked on 9/11 in various parts of the Middle East.

America has become a very different place from that fateful Tuesday. The outrageous costs of life and treasury in two wars that have done nothing other than to give credence to Bin Laden’s ugly predictions have left our economy in ruins, our political system immobilized and useless and our moral standing lost in the ashes of the rubble at Ground Zero.

Thousands upon thousands of lives later, countless tortured confessions later, we are no safer nor better off than we were on September 11th. Only more universally reviled and just as likely to blame every Muslim that lives and breathes – or those killed on 9/11 – for the events of that fateful day. Millions of photos and tears later, we rage without introspection, still unable to separate our anger from our self-righteousness.

Billions of confiscated bottles later, we still wait barefoot in lines at airports, subject to radiation or molestation by the TSA. While our unsupervised railway lines, busses and uninspected ports remain just as vulnerable as they ever were, thanks to regulation loathing politicians who would sooner give a billionaire a tax break than a federal job that serves us all to someone who desperately needs it.

Thousands of gay bashings later, and concerted efforts to brand, scapegoat, marginalize and ensure or retain second-class citizens, far too many Americans still seek to deny rights to anyone who isn’t straight or part of an idealized nuclear family. The same rights they would deny Mark Bingham, or Father Mychel Judge as they weep over their memorials. The same ugly, dangerous, hate-filled vitriol vomited by the likes of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell remains unchanged, other than that Jerry Falwell is now somewhere answering to his bitter, uncompromising God. As the Pamela Gellers and Michelle Malkins of the world fill the void in a sad, ironic salute to gender equality.

Millions of hypocritical musings and flag-draped, lip-serviced, patronizing mutterings later, the first responders hailed on Fox News and other right wing blogs and websites and radio stations, are the same people whose membership in unions have deemed them enemy number one, as America seeks to cut their wealth and weaken their collective bargaining rights to ensure greater profit and less accountability to anyone or anything other than the bottom line.

Millions of iPads and iPhones and smart this and smart that later, our incredible advances in technology come with very costly strings attached. Secret Apple “investigative units” acting in concert with the San Francisco Police Department, cell phone companies (that were aiding and abetting illegal secret wiretapping policies) and transportation agencies cutting off service to quell First Amendment rights of protestors against police brutality, fifty-four page intellectual property contracts and draconian digital rights management policies, and an unprecedented erosion of privacy that we complicity accept in the name of convenience, just like we do unconstitutional legislation under the guise of security.

Millions of underwater homes later – both from loan-sharking predators killing the lives and dreams of those seeking to better themselves, and literally underwater from an old, crumbling infrastructure – we continue to prop up banks and financial institutions that got us into this mess, while cutting vital services we expect from the government, such as the Federal Aviation Agency, so vitally important on September 11th.

Billions of carbon emissions later, we still choke our environment with shrieks for reduced “job-destroying” regulations that fly in the face of science, deny the realities of climate change, and allow giant corporations like BP to continue reckless drilling experiments at the expense of our oceans, marine life and livelihoods, while they “remedy” accidents by pouring toxic, inadequately tested dispersants to hide rather then fix the devastation.

It’s difficult to contemplate the almost irreparable, catastrophic damage exacted on the American people and rest of the world by a greedy, profit-only-at-any-cost-motivated, corrupt, dishonest, thieving, financial industry, dependent on a boated military industrial complex designed to make defense industry CEOs and Wall Street billionaires even richer at the expense of everyone else.  With the help of a complicit, empty joke of a puppet-controlled political system disguised as two-party to keep everyone divided and distracted.

Had so many of the victims not been regular, hard-working people going about their day, or homeless victims asleep in the subways below, or first responders rushing to help and save their fellow citizens, the symbolism of Bin Laden’s attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon might be a lot more readily understood, if not applauded, by Main Street — would it have happened today.

Ten years later, we are just as stupid, pathetic, unsafe, and deluded as we ever were, if not more. The only thing that’s changed is that we have grown older as the memories and potential lessons of 9/11 fade into the distance. And unless and until we do something about it, Osama Bin Laden won.

Clinton Fein is an internationally acclaimed author, artist, and First Amendment activist, best-​known for his 1997 First Amendment Supreme Court victory against United States Attorney General Janet Reno. Fein has also gained international recognition for his Annoy​.com site, and for his work as a political artist. Fein is on the Board of Directors of the First Amendment Project, “a nonprofit advocacy organization dedicated to protecting and promoting freedom of information, expression, and petition.” Fein’s political and privacy activism have been widely covered around the world. His work also led him to be nominated for a 2001 PEN/Newman’s Own First Amendment Award.

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Trump Explains ‘Dumb’ Has a ‘B’

Published

on

President Donald Trump thrilled his supporters in New York on Friday as he shared how he came up with his latest nickname for Democrats — his explanation included a spelling lesson.

“Blue means Dumocrat,” the president said. “That’s a new name I came up with.”

“I was, I was thinking about this character we have in the House. His name is Hakeem Jeffries,” Trump said to boos from the audience.

“And he’s a low IQ person, very low IQ.”

“And I watched what he was saying, and what the horrible things he was saying, and I said, ‘He’s a dumb guy.’ I said, Wait a minute, he’s a Dumocrat. That’s how I got the name,” Trump excitedly said.

“You take the ‘e’ out, you don’t use the ‘b’. A lot of people don’t know ‘dumb’ has a ‘b’ in it, actually. You don’t need it. You discard the ‘b.’

“But you take the ‘e’ out, and you replace it with a ‘u.'”

“They are Dumocrats. You know why? ‘Cause their policies are dumb. Their policies are very dumb. All of their policies.”

Critics mocked the president.

“His uncle taught at MIT, but Trump just recently learned there is a b in dumb,” wrote political strategist Jeff Timmer.

Dumbo @realDonaldTrump here is the only one who doesn’t know there’s a b in DUMB,” said former GOP Congresswoman Barbara Comstock.

“It’s impossible to overstate how f— — stupid Trump looks on the world stage,” wrote another online commenter.

 

Image via Reuters 

 

Continue Reading

News

‘Good Riddance’: Critics Cheer Tulsi Gabbard’s ‘Shocking’ Resignation

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s controversial Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is resigning.

“Unfortunately, I must submit my resignation, effective June 30, 2026,” DNI Gabbard wrote to President Trump, Fox News reports. “My husband, Abraham, has recently been diagnosed with an extremely rare form of bone cancer.”

“During pivotal moments,” NBC News reports, “as Trump deliberated over possible military action or watched live video feeds of operations in Iran or Venezuela, Gabbard was often not in the room, underscoring her outsider status.”

“Gabbard has had a tough tenure being sidelined on Venezuela and Iran. Last month, Trump floated replacing her with Pam Bondi, but some advisers saved her,” reported WIRED’s Hugo Lowell.

President Trump wrote that Gabbard had done an “incredible job,” and “we will miss her,” while Reuters reports that the White House ‌”forced” Gabbard “to ⁠resign ​from her ​post, a person familiar ​with ​the matter said ‌on ⁠Friday.”

The Wall Street Journal’s Dave Brown called Gabbard’s tenure “tumultuous.”

Critics were quick to respond.

“Good riddance. The Iran war has been the biggest display of intelligence incompetence in decades,” wrote U.S. Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI).

“Tulsi Gabbard leaves this administration in disgrace after helping Trump drag the country into yet another forever war in the Middle East,” wrote political strategist Mike Nellis. “She built her entire image on opposing these wars, then abandoned that principle the second it became politically inconvenient. That’s her legacy: a complete fraud, completely full of s— — about the one thing people thought she genuinely believed in. Good f— — riddance.”

“Also, is anybody in Congress or the media going to get to the bottom of the whistleblower’s story about Tulsi Gabbard withholding classified intercepted intel for political reasons?” Nellis continued. “What the hell happened there, or are we just going to pretend that didn’t happen?”

“Are we ever going to found out if Tulsi Gabbard broke how many different national security laws by allegedly refusing to hand over investigative documents, or is that just going away now?” asked writer Charlotte Clymer.

Professor and policy analyst Adam Cochran called Gabbard’s resignation “shocking,” and added: “Can’t imagine what they would ask to do that is too out of line for her…”

Associate Professor of Political Science Christopher Clary said Gabbard “will go down as perhaps the most ineffective and incompetent DNI in the short history of that position.”

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

The ‘Slow, Boring’ and ‘Easy’ Way to Tax the Rich: Expert

Published

on

President Donald Trump managed to effectively raise taxes on the majority of Americans through his tax policies, while handing the richest five percent a tax cut. Now, many Americans want to see the rich pay their fair share — and that could mean increasing their taxes.

The former chief economist of the White House Office of Management and Budget, Professor Zachary Liscow, argues there’s a “slow, boring” yet “easy” way to do so.

“The United States is seeing an increasing concentration of wealth at the very top and a worsening national debt,” Liscow writes in an op-ed at The New York Times. “For many Americans, taxing the rich more is an obvious move.”

He details some of the “novel proposals to curb the many intricate ways the rich make and hide their money,” including a wealth tax, a tax on unrealized gains, and a tax on “loans that billionaires take against their stock.”

But, Liscow warns, while novel, these methods would not raise the substantial amount of money the U.S. needs.

“The boring truth is that Congress can accomplish a lot simply by raising the rates of the taxes already on the books,” Liscow explains.

He examines U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s (D-MA) proposal to tax “fortunes above $50 million,” and says there are “serious constitutional and policy arguments for this idea, but the Supreme Court’s current members would probably strike it down.”

There is a billionaire’s tax proposal by U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) that would tax unrealized capital gains, “the appreciation in the paper value of assets such as stocks.” That would likely find a Supreme Court challenge.

There are other tax vehicles, like fixing the “buy, borrow, die” loophole, which would tax loans taken against stock portfolios, but that would likely not raise sufficient funds: “It’s just not where the money is.”

He finds that “the most powerful lever is also the simplest one,” and concludes that “Congress has a simpler, tried-and-true tax policy to choose from: raising the rates.”

Liscow is advocating to restore the “top marginal ordinary income tax rate to its pre-2017 level of 39.6 percent” — where it was before Trump’s first term in office.

“In addition, raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent toward the 35 percent it had been set at historically would add hundreds of billions in revenue for the government,” he says.

“Raising the rates,” Liscow concludes, “the simple, boring answer — is where the real money lies.”

 

Image: Christopher Penler / Shutterstock.com

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 AlterNet Media.