Connect with us

Meanwhile… In The Mainstream Media… It Was “Gays Behaving Badly”

Published

on

Last night’s protest at the Harold Ford/Stonewall Democrats event caused a great deal of “conversation.” My response, “Harold Ford’s Treatment No Better Than Tea Party Protests,” seems to have stirred up almost as much.

Let me add this.

Yes, I have a problem with the Tea Party style protest at last night’s event.

But had the protesters let Ford speak, THEN protested, I would totally have been fine with that. Had they restricted their protest to before and/or after his speech, or had they restricted it to outside the debate room before, during, and/or after his speech, I would totally have supported that too.

Protest? Absolutely!

Civil disobedience — done right, designed to change hearts and minds? Absolutely!

We are in the business of winning our civil rights — rights that I believe are “unalienable.” Being in the business of winning our civil rights from a majority who do not seem to want to hand them over to us means we are in the business of having to win hearts and minds.

Not the heart and mind of Harold Ford, but of the rest of America.

Nasty, rude, juvenile tactics designed to shut down conversation and debate are exactly what the Right has done to us for centuries. To emulate their oppressive behavior is simply not a smart tactic. It does not help us.

There are two arguments going on here. The folks who are on the side of the protesters, I believe, only care about sending a message to Harold Ford. They thought a rude, unruly, shout-down, Tea Party style protest was the best way to do it. Obviously, I disagree.

Those who have a problem with the protesters, at least, myself, know that Ford will either not run, or not win if he does. And so, I’m more concerned with our reputation, with winning hearts and minds, with having the average American not see us as “the mob,” so that they will WANT to support us. At least, so we don’t give them reasons to hate us more than they do.

I’m a fighter. I spend all day long fighting. But I’m smart enough to know that we need to be big-picture oriented. Not juvenile-tactics focused.

One thing I haven’t said publicly yet also is this.

My disagreement here comes at a price. I know these folks. Some of them I consider my friends. And while I was unaware of what they were going to do specifically — yes, I knew there would be a protest — I did not know what that would consist of, I assumed it would have been outside the debate room. And I have no doubt that they no longer will consider me their friend. Politics does that to people. I’m sorry to see that happen. But I cannot change my mind when so much is at stake.

Meanwhile, to prove I’m far from alone in my disagreement with the tactics of “The Power,” here’s what the “non-gay,” mainstream media — the one that voting citizens read, too –  had to say.

(Although, again, I’ll mention even Queerty agrees with me, as have many other bloggers. Queerty’s front page says, “Did New York’s Terribly Rude Gays Give Harold Ford Jr. a Chance to Explain.)

And an update: Joe.My.God, whom I respect immensely, weighed in too:

“While I’m no fan of a carpetbagger like Rep. Ford, I don’t see the point of disrupting an ostensibly friendly speech on our own turf. Ford was the invited guest of the Stonewall Democrats.”

Look at the way we were represented in the mainstream media. Look at how we were perceived last night. Did we help ourselves in the media? No.

New York Magazine: “New York Gays Are Rude to Harold Ford Jr.

Read some of the comments there:

“Though,
I don’t agree with the Tea Baggers at the town hall meetings last year. The respectful Tea Partiers spoke & listened with respect & dignity.
As a gay man, I can’t approve of the way that those other gays acted last night. I have no problem with activists protesting in the streets, however, when you’re inside at a meeting, there has to be some form of respect.
You can dissagree with him, you can tell him a lot of things but do it with respect.”

“Rob,
I called out the Tea Partiers who were rude at the town hall meetings because they were.
As a gay man, I’m calling out my fellow gays for being rude.
Never kiss the politican’s @$$, however, have respect, I don’t care what politcal or social or cultural issue is at stake.”

“Wow. I can’t imagine a situation where I wouldn’t let someone speak and just chanted insults at them. Was he an invited guest? Yikes.”

“It’s really not cool to set off things like confetti poppers at political events. I’m sure it scared the shit out of him. Not cool man.”

“They’re like any other group of NY liberals. They’re always rude to people who are not kissing their asses at the moment. They are better than everyone else, you see…and they deserve that respect!”

Gothamist: “Gay Rights Group Heckles Harold Ford

Comments:

“So they invited him to speak there just so they could heckle him? Kinda lame.”

“Would have been better if they invited him and no one showed up to listen. Heckling is sooo 1900s.”

DNA Info: “Harold Ford Jr. Gets Hostile Reception from Stonewall Democrats

NY1: “Crowd Heckles Ford Jr. On Gay Marriage Stance

New York Post: “Ford lambasted by gay community at Democratic Club

I rest my case, except to say this: There are too few of us, and too few of our supporters. The LGBTQ community needs to find a way to work together. It’s OK to disagree over tactics and positions, but it’s not OK to make ad hominen attacks. When that starts happening, we’ve already started to lose.

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘This Is Authoritarianism’: Experts Warn on US Midterm Elections

Published

on

The United States is facing a major test of American democracy as experts warn that the Trump administration is dragging the nation into “some form of autocracy,” NPR reports.

The U.S. has already crossed the threshold and become an “electoral autocracy,” Staffan I. Lindberg, the director of Sweden’s V-Dem Institute, told NPR.

“I would argue that the United States in 2025-26 has slid into a mild form of competitive authoritarianism,” said Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at Harvard University and co-author of How Democracies Die. “I think it’s reversible, but this is authoritarianism.”

“Under competitive authoritarianism,” NPR explained, “countries still hold elections, but the ruling party uses various tactics — attacking the press, disenfranchising voters, weaponizing the justice system and threatening critics — to tilt the electoral playing field in its favor.”

Levitsky cited several critical points in September as examples, including the Trump administration’s threat against ABC parent company Disney following host Jimmy Kimmel’s remarks on the killing of Charlie Kirk.

READ MORE: ‘Backtracking and Blowing Things Up’ Defines Trump’s ‘Whiplash’ Second Year: Report

“We can do this the easy way or the hard way,” Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), said.

He also cited Trump’s proposal to use American cities as “training grounds” for troops.

“We should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military, National Guard, but military,” Trump said, as the Military Times reported.

The president “told the commanders that defending the homeland was the military’s ‘most important priority’ and suggested the leaders in attendance could be tasked with assisting federal law enforcement interventions against an ‘invasion from within’ Democratic-led cities, such as Chicago and New York City.”

“No different than a foreign enemy,” Trump said, “but more difficult in many ways because they don’t wear uniforms.”

Levitsky, NPR reported, “said this is the kind of language dictators in South America used in the 1970s — leaders like Augusto Pinochet in Chile.”

NPR notes that the “next big test” could come during the midterms.

Kim Scheppele, a Princeton University sociologist who has studied the authoritarian tactics of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, warned that in 2014 Orbán’s government “disenfranchised almost all the Hungarians in the U.K., most of whom were oppositional to Orbán,”

Dartmouth College professor of government Brendan Nyhan warned, “The way Election Day works in this country, there are no do-overs.”

READ MORE: Far Right Extremist Leader Puts Trump on Notice Over Epstein Files

 

Image via Shutterstock

Continue Reading

News

‘Backtracking and Blowing Things Up’ Defines Trump’s ‘Whiplash’ Second Year: Report

Published

on

If Americans during President Donald Trump’s first term were exhausted by his “controversy and chaos,” they now appear to be similarly distressed by his “backtracking and blowing things up,” according to a report by Politico.

In the second year of his second term, President Trump “intensified the volatility” from year one “with a succession of whiplash-inducing policy swings, several of which have almost immediately withered in the face of Republican opposition and public outcry.”

For example, the Trump administration just withdrew thousands of federal law enforcement officers from Minneapolis, following the two violent deaths of U.S. citizens and after “clashes with protesters turned the tide of public opinion against the president’s immigration crackdown.”

READ MORE: Far Right Extremist Leader Puts Trump on Notice Over Epstein Files

There is the Greenland gambit, which appears to be paused, at least for now. There were the “Liberation Day” tariffs he announced in April, only to partially, but quickly, lower them “within days following tremors in global bond markets.”

Trump threatened to decertify Canadian aircraft, then dropped the threat. He declared he would drop credit card interest rates to ten percent, then dropped that, too, and in a rare move, asked Congress for legislation to do so. His push to create 50-year mortgages appears to have subsided.

He paused millions of dollars in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding for state programs, then reversed course about a day later.

“The whiplash has real implications,” Chrissie Juliano, the executive director of the Big Cities Health Coalition, told Politico. “It’s incredibly disruptive, even if you can get back to continuing the work, you know, two days later.”

Domestically and internationally, Trump’s “unpredictability” has become a “feature, not a bug.”

“In many matters, especially negotiations with other countries, his mercurial opacity is often an attempt to gain leverage, but his threats seemingly lead just as often to backtracking as blowing things up, be they Iranian missile depots, Venezuelan drug boats or the transatlantic alliance,” Politico reported.

READ MORE: ‘No Going Back’: Report Warns Post-MAGA America Will Never Be the Same

The risks are real.

“Even proposals that don’t ultimately move forward have consequences,” a financial industry insider, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly without fear of blowback from the White House, told Politico. “Markets react. Issuers reassess risk. When policymakers float price controls, it creates uncertainty that can translate into tighter underwriting and reduced access — particularly for higher-risk or lower-income consumers.”

Trump’s poll numbers are now at the lowest point of his second term, Republican pollster Whit Ayres told Politico.

“There’s a sense that this is a pretty chaotic administration and seems to remind people of the pandemic period in the first term,” Ayres said.

When a president’s approval rating is above 50 percent, the party in the White House loses House seats in the midterms, “but not that many,” Ayres noted. “When the president’s job approval is below, the average loss of seats is 32.”

Ayres “said that Trump’s approval numbers largely mirror those from his first term, when the public over four years grew exhausted by constant controversy and chaos.”

“Joe Biden’s fundamental message in 2020 was to restore normalcy,” Ayres said. “And that seemed to be persuasive to enough people to get him elected.”

READ MORE: ‘Political Stunt’: Trump Admin Rages After NYC Re-Raises Pride Flag at Stonewall

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Rogan on Epstein Files: ‘Looks Terrible’ for Trump

Published

on

Prominent podcaster Joe Rogan warned that the handling of the Epstein files “looks terrible” for President Donald Trump and his administration.

“During Tuesday and Thursday’s episodes, Rogan criticized redactions the Department of Justice made from the files,” The Hill reported.

“Who knows what f — — happens with all this Epstein files s — —,” he said, according to video of his streaming show. “It just keeps getting crazier and crazier and crazier and deeper and deeper.”

“Why would your name be redacted if you’re not a victim?” Rogan also asked. “Like, this is what’s crazy about all this. Like, how come you redact some people and you don’t redact other people?”

READ MORE: Far Right Extremist Leader Puts Trump on Notice Over Epstein Files

“Like, what is this?” the podcaster continued. “This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks f — — terrible. It looks terrible. It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real. This is all a hoax. This is not a hoax. Like, did you not know?”

“Maybe he didn’t know if you want to be charitable? But this is definitely not a hoax. And if you’ve got redacted people’s names, and these people aren’t victims, you’re not protecting the victim. So what are you doing?”

“And how come all this s — — is not released?” Rogan asked.

 

READ MORE: ‘No Going Back’: Report Warns Post-MAGA America Will Never Be the Same

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.