Connect with us

Licensed To Parent: The Unasked Question

Published

on

var addthis_config = {“data_track_addressbar”:true};

Lance Fein challenges America and its policy makers to consider licensing parents in view of the tragic mass murder of 20 children and six adults in Newtown, Connecticut

The horrific execution of 20 children and six adults in Connecticut on December 14, 2012, left the country truly heartbroken.  I watched the story unfold and a sickness developed in stomach.  I am writing this article from two perspectives.  As a parent of five-and six-year-olds, these children could have been mine.  As an educator working in a school with at risk students, this could have been me.

A deep feeling of despair overcame me.  Not just because this was the now the fourth time in the last few years we have seem mass killings in schools or public places or that each time the carnage grows.  Not because this time it was children who were massacred.  The despair came from a much deeper, darker place.  It came from the realization that the only reason I was having this type of visceral reaction was because of the age of the victims.  Had this been another shopping mall, restaurant, or university I am not sure I would have followed the news story.  The despair came from the realization that I was becoming numb to random acts of unspeakable violence.  The despair came from wondering when I would become numb to hearing about a classroom full of six-years-olds was randomly slaughtered.  I never want to be numb to this reality.

Why? That was the question everyone was asking.  What could have led a person to commit these horrific acts?  The usual suspects were thrown around.  Gun control?  Mental health?  Security within our schools, movie theatres, temples, malls?  How was this person allowed to develop to the point where he could commit the heinous act?

These are valid questions but do not address a key issue associated with these shootings.  There is however, one question that has never been asked, and if not addressed will continue to lead to these tragic violent and senseless acts.

Why do we not require a license to have a child?   Are you shocked by this question?  More shocked than you were when you turned on the news only to see a classroom of 20 first graders massacred?  What is more shocking?

As someone who has spent the majority of their life working with and educating children who exhibit similar behaviors to a young Adam Lanza on a daily basis, I can assure you there is one question that needs to be addressed that has never been included in the national debate about young men and gun violence.

Animals Learn Parenting Skills Organically

As human beings we are the only species who defies survival of the fittest.  Science, technology and medicine has allowed us to continually extend our life span, save those who without medical intervention would not survive, and accept unchecked propagation.  No other species on earth lives by the rules we live by.  As a comparison, lions are the exact opposite.

When an adult male takes over a pride by killing the alpha male, he kills every cub in the pride as well.  Why? To ensure that only his offspring will survive.  With that being stated, I am grateful that we do not have jungle law; kill or be killed; survival of the fittest.  However, with the power to save, extend, and protect life comes great responsibility.

Maternal instinct may be enough in the wild, but it is nowhere close to enough in our modern society.  And that is where our downfall lies.  There has been no compensation for the amount of knowledge, structure, and security children now need for healthy development.  We have just expected that these skills, like maternal instinct would evolve naturally.  And we were wrong.

A License for Parenting

We regulate everything.  You need a license to drive, fish, own a gun, get married, and even own a dog.  But anyone can have a child.  Yes, the question is:  “Why do we not require a license to have a child?”  While it may be a God-given right to give birth, God does not bestow the same knowledge on parents to raise children as he does the right to be one.  And nobody should be told if they can have a child.  Anyone can have a child.  And anyone should be able to have a child, provided they have been given the proper training and education.

Our most precious resource and hope for future generations is almost completely neglected.  Before you become outraged at the idea, let me clarify that I am not proposing anything more than requiring expecting parents to attend classes which educate them and provide them with the knowledge and resources necessary to maximize the potential of raising healthy, well-adjusted, and happy children. 

I can already hear the various groups screaming from the rooftops of how having to obtain a license to have a child is a violation of numerous civil and constitutional rights.  However, if you take just a few moments to let the idea sink in, it speaks to the root problem of not just the violent acts that our country experiences on a regular basis, but the cause of the majority of the problems we face.

Mandatory Parenting Classes

I am not advocating stopping people from having children.  I am simply proposing that we adopt the same policy on childbirth that we do to owning a dog or driving a car.  You can drive as many cars as you want and own as many dogs as you want, but you must have a license.  Why?  Because we are not born with parenting skills.  They have to be taught.  And if they are not taught, you end up with parents who are incapable of raising children.  Not because they don’t have the ability, but because they were never provided the education, techniques, guidelines, interventions, and support to ensure their child would grow up to be a healthy, happy, and a contributing member of society.  And without this education and support for parents, the success of every child born is a roll of the dice.

 The fact that an individual has the ability to fertilize an egg and carry an embryo to term does not qualify them as parents.  People who adopt or require fertility treatments are put through a screening process before they can have a child.  Single and gay parents in many cases are not even considered suitable parents by the screening process.  The notion that if you can have a child naturally (even if by accident or as a teenager) qualifies you to be a parent is ludicrous.

We used to rely on a nuclear family and our schools to help raise our children.  Our grandparents taught our parents, the schools helped instill discipline and respect for others and oneself; two-parent homes were the norm.  All of this has changed, yet we have done nothing to replace the voids left behind.

If we are not mature enough and honest enough as a society to have this discussion, not only will these tragedies continue, but as a society we will devolve to a point of survival of the fittest.

Our politicians continually talk about investment in our children, in education, in our future.  But the reality is by the time children reach the age of school readiness it is too late.  The interventions, support, and resources need to begin before the child is born.  Parents need to be educated on nutrition, prenatal care, and proper care and environment for the expectant mother, and most importantly understand the self-sacrifice it is going to take to raise a child.  The most important rule, “You might be the parent and in charge, but your child’s safety, health, and physical needs must always come before your own.”

A Parenting Deficit

I am not writing this column because I am an extremist.  I have dedicated my life to educating at risk populations and helping families develop the structure, skills, and consistency they need to raise their children.  My colleagues and I have worked and continue to work with over 200 children every day who exhibit many of the same behaviors and traits that young Adam Lanza, James Holmes, Dylan Klebold, Eric Harris, Jared Loughner and Seung-Hui exhibited when they were children.  I know first hand, that with appropriate intervention and support many of these children’s lives can be turned around and saved.

The problem is not the children or their parents; it is a direct lack of knowledge, a parenting deficit.  And the only way to overcome a knowledge deficit is by education and remediation.  We need to educate and remediate parents.  We need to be proactive from birth not reactive when our children become murderous felons.

I read the article “I am Adam Lanza’s mother.”  If you haven’t read it, I recommend that you do.  It speaks volumes to what I have written above.  Here is a mother who believes she has done everything she can to help her son.  Yet nothing has worked.  From the article it sounds like she is a single mother of three children.  I have no idea where the father is but it is evident from the article there is no male role model or disciplinarian in this family.

The interventions the mother uses are the best ones she can think of, but are ineffective; taking away her son’s guns when he called her “a stupid bitch.”  The government systems have not been able to provide the necessary support for her son, her, or her family.  It is just a matter of time until her eldest hurts her or one of her younger children (if he hasn’t already).  The mother allows herself to be bitten, hit, and threatened with knives.  She locks up all the sharp objects in a Tupperware container and has taught her younger children to run out of the house and lock themselves in the car when the oldest son doesn’t get what he wants, becomes agitated, and starts raging.

Imagine living under these conditions as a parent, sibling, or even as the aggressive child himself.  If he truly cannot help himself then he needs to be institutionalized.  However, I can introduce you to another 100 mothers who have similar stories; whose children were out of control before they found an appropriate environment.  Some of these children have chemical imbalances, and some of them need to be institutionalized.  However, the vast majority needs to be taught how to behave and their parents need to be taught how to control their home.

Parenting is a Learned Skill

In almost every case, regardless of what the solution is with the child, the parents need to be educated as well.  Parenting is a skill and like all other skills it needs to be taught and practiced in order for mastery to occur.  I need to be clear on this point.  I am not blaming parents; I am stating that we need to educate parents.  Despite all my experience working with children and my formal education in psychology and education, I still find myself questioning some of my parenting decisions.  I cannot imagine what it must be like for parents without practical or formal training.

Unfortunately in some cases, it is too late.  I can assure you that her son did not suddenly develop these type of behavior problems.  I can guarantee that unless there was some type of traumatic triggering event, her son was a problem for most of his life; perhaps not recognized.  And even when the mother recognized the problem, she did not have the proper skill set to handle the situation.

My ideas for licensing parents are not discriminating.  They are not based on sociological or economic factors, focus on specific racial, or religious identities.  All they require is a commitment and sacrifice of the parent; the same commitment required to be a successful parent.

I hope that the media who reads this post is willing to acknowledge the unacknowledged issue of inadequate parenting skills and advocate for making inadequate parenting one of the talking points when discussing our continuing national tragedy of young, troubled young men who kill using guns in America.

Image courtesy of Clinton Fein, a contributor to the New Civil Rights Movement

image001-1Lance Fein is the Executive Director of Alternative Education Foundation (AEF).  AEF is a non -profit organization which operates schools and provides service and support to students who are not being successful in traditional school environments, socially, and/or at home.  Many of the students AEF caters to are diagnosed with Autistic Spectrum Disorders, ADHD, and other social and communication deficits.  Fein has dedicated the majority of his career to the creation and establishment of programs which focus on the academic, social, cognitive, and emotional development of children and adolescents.   Under his leadership, AEF now operates four schools in the Broward County area.   Fein earned his Bachelor’s degree in Psychology with a focus on Biological Basis of Behavior from Florida Atlantic University; his Master’s of Science Degree in Education from American InterContinental University; and is currently completing his Doctoral thesis at Walden University.  He is author of a forthcoming book titled “How to stop your child from becoming a mass murderer and other safety concerns.”

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

OPINION

Noem Defends Shooting Her 14-Month Old Puppy to Death, Brags She Has Media ‘Gasping’

Published

on

Republican Governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota, a top potential Trump vice presidential running mate pick, revealed in a forthcoming book she “hated” her 14-month old puppy and shot it to death. Massive online outrage ensued, including accusations of “animal cruelty” and “cold-blooded murder,” but the pro-life former member of Congress is defending her actions and bragging she had the media “gasping.”

“Cricket was a wirehair pointer, about 14 months old,” Noem writes in her soon-to-be released book, according to The Guardian which reports “the dog, a female, had an ‘aggressive personality’ and needed to be trained to be used for hunting pheasant.”

“By taking Cricket on a pheasant hunt with older dogs, Noem says, she hoped to calm the young dog down and begin to teach her how to behave. Unfortunately, Cricket ruined the hunt, going ‘out of her mind with excitement, chasing all those birds and having the time of her life’.”

“Then, on the way home after the hunt, as Noem stopped to talk to a local family, Cricket escaped Noem’s truck and attacked the family’s chickens, ‘grabb[ing] one chicken at a time, crunching it to death with one bite, then dropping it to attack another’.”

READ MORE: President Hands Howard Stern Live Interview After NY Times Melts Down Over Biden Brush-Off

“Cricket the untrainable dog, Noem writes, behaved like ‘a trained assassin’.”

Except Cricket wasn’t trained. Online several people with experience training dogs have said Noem did everything wrong.

“I hated that dog,” Noem wrote, calling the young girl pup “untrainable,” “dangerous to anyone she came in contact with,” and “less than worthless … as a hunting dog.”

“At that moment,” Noem wrote, “I realized I had to put her down.”

“It was not a pleasant job,” she added, “but it had to be done. And after it was over, I realized another unpleasant job needed to be done.”

The Guardian reports Noem went on that day to slaughter a goat that “smelled ‘disgusting, musky, rancid’ and ‘loved to chase’ Noem’s children, knocking them down and ruining their clothes.”

She dragged both animals separately into a gravel pit and shot them one at a time. The puppy died after one shell, but the goat took two.

On social media Noem expressed no regret, no sadness, no empathy for the animals others say did not need to die, and certainly did not need to die so cruelly.

READ MORE: ‘Assassination of Political Rivals as an Official Act’: AOC Warns Take Trump ‘Seriously’

But she did use the opportunity to promote her book.

Attorney and legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold says Governor Noem’s actions might have violated state law.

“You slaughtered a 14-month-old puppy because it wasn’t good at the ‘job’ you chose for it?” he asked. “SD § 40-1-2.3. ‘No person owning or responsible for the care of an animal may neglect, abandon, or mistreat the animal.'”

The Democratic National Committee released a statement saying, “Kristi Noem’s extreme record goes beyond bizarre rants about killing her pets – she also previously said a 10-year-old rape victim should be forced to carry out her pregnancy, does not support exceptions for rape or incest, and has threatened to throw pharmacists in jail for providing medication abortions.”

Former Trump White House Director of Strategic Communications Alyssa Farah Griffin, now a co-host on “The View” wrote, “There are countless organizations that re-home dogs from owners who are incapable of properly training and caring for them.”

The Lincoln Project’s Rick Wilson blasted the South Dakota governor.

“Kristi Noem is trash,” he began. “Decades with hunting- and bird-dogs, and the number I’ve killed because they were chicken-sharp or had too much prey drive is ZERO. Puppies need slow exposure to birds, and bird-scent.”

“She killed a puppy because she was lazy at training bird dogs, not because it was a bad dog,” he added. “Not every dog is for the field, but 99.9% of them are trainable or re-homeable. We have one now who was never going in the field, but I didn’t kill her. She’s sleeping on the couch. You down old dogs, hurt dogs, and sick dogs humanely, not by shooting them and tossing them in a gravel pit. Unsporting and deliberately cruel…but she wrote this to prove the cruelty is the point.”

Melissa Jo Peltier, a writer and producer of the “Dog Whisperer with Cesar Millan” series, also heaped strong criticism on Noem.

“After 10+ years working with Cesar Millan & other highly specialized trainers, I believe NO dog should be put down just because they can’t or won’t do what we decide WE want them to,” Peltier said in a lengthy statement. “Dogs MUST be who they are. Sadly, that’s often who WE teach them to be. And our species is a hot mess. I would have happily taken Kristi Noem’s puppy & rehomed it. What she did is animal cruelty & cold blooded murder in my book.”

READ MORE: ‘Blood on Your Hands’: Tennessee Republicans OK Arming Teachers After Deadly School Shooting

Continue Reading

OPINION

President Hands Howard Stern Live Interview After NY Times Melts Down Over Biden Brush-Off

Published

on

President Joe Biden gave an nearly-unannounced, last-minute, live exclusive interview Friday morning to Howard Stern, the SiriusXM radio host who for decades, from the mid-1990s to about 2015, was a top Trump friend, fan, and aficionado. But the impetus behind the President’s move appears to be a rare and unsigned statement from the The New York Times Company, defending the “paper of record” after months of anger from the public over what some say is its biased negative coverage of the Biden presidency and, especially, a Thursday report by Politico claiming Times Publisher A.G. Sulzberger is furious the President has refused to give the “Grey Lady” an in-person  interview.

“The Times’ desire for a sit-down interview with Biden by the newspaper’s White House team is no secret around the West Wing or within the D.C. bureau,” Politico reported. “Getting the president on the record with the paper of record is a top priority for publisher A.G. Sulzberger. So much so that last May, when Vice President Kamala Harris arrived at the newspaper’s midtown headquarters for an off-the-record meeting with around 40 Times journalists, Sulzberger devoted several minutes to asking her why Biden was still refusing to grant the paper — or any major newspaper — an interview.”

“In Sulzberger’s view,” Politico explained, “only an interview with a paper like the Times can verify that the 81-year-old Biden is still fit to hold the presidency.”

But it was this statement that made Politico’s scoop go viral.

READ MORE: Justices’ Views on Trump Immunity Stun Experts: ‘Watching the Constitution Be Rewritten’

“’All these Biden people think that the problem is Peter Baker or whatever reporter they’re mad at that day,’ one Times journalist said. ‘It’s A.G. He’s the one who is pissed [that] Biden hasn’t done any interviews and quietly encourages all the tough reporting on his age.'”

Popular Information founder Judd Legum in March documented The New York Times’ (and other top papers’) obsession with Biden’s age after the Hur Report.

Thursday evening the Times put out a “scorching” statement, as Politico later reported, not on the newspaper’s website but on the company’s corporate website, not addressing the Politico piece directly but calling it “troubling” that President Biden “has so actively and effectively avoided questions from independent journalists during his term.”

Media watchers and critics pushed back on the Times’ statement.

READ MORE: ‘To Do God Knows What’: Local Elections Official Reads Lara Trump the Riot Act

“NYT issues an unprecedented statement slamming Biden for ‘actively and effectively avoid[ing] questions from independent journalists during his term’ and claiming it’s their ‘independence’ that Biden dislikes, when it’s actually that they’re dying to trip him up,” wrote media critic Dan Froomkin, editor of Press Watch.

Froomkin also pointed to a 2017 report from Poynter, a top journalism site published by The Poynter Institute, that pointed out the poor job the Times did of interviewing then-President Trump.

Others, including former Biden Deputy Secretary of State Brian McKeon, debunked the Times’ claim President Biden hasn’t given interviews to independent journalists by pointing to Biden’s interviews with CBS News’ “60 Minutes” and a 20-minute sit-down interview with veteran journalist John Harwood for ProPublica.

Former Chicago Sun-Times editor Mark Jacob, now a media critic who publishes Stop the Presses, offered a more colorful take of Biden’s decision to go on Howard Stern.

The Times itself just last month reported on a “wide-ranging interview” President Biden gave to The New Yorker.

Watch the video and read the social media posts above or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Doesn’t Care if Pregnant Women Live or Die’: Alito Slammed Over Emergency Abortion Remarks

 

 

Continue Reading

News

CNN Smacks Down Trump Rant Courthouse So ‘Heavily Guarded’ MAGA Cannot Attend His Trial

Published

on

Donald Trump’s Friday morning claim Manhattan’s Criminal Courts Building is “heavily guarded” so his supporters cannot attend his trial was torched by a top CNN anchor. The ex-president, facing 34 felony charges in New York, had been urging his followers to show up and protest on the courthouse steps, but few have.

“I’m at the heavily guarded Courthouse. Security is that of Fort Knox, all so that MAGA will not be able to attend this trial, presided over by a highly conflicted pawn of the Democrat Party. It is a sight to behold! Getting ready to do my Courthouse presser. Two minutes!” Trump wrote Friday morning on his Truth Social account.

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins supplied a different view.

“Again, the courthouse is open the public. The park outside, where a handful of his supporters have gathered on trials days, is easily accessible,” she wrote minutes after his post.

READ MORE: ‘Assassination of Political Rivals as an Official Act’: AOC Warns Take Trump ‘Seriously’

Trump has tried to rile up his followers to come out and make a strong showing.

On Monday Trump urged his supporters to “rally behind MAGA” and “go out and peacefully protest” at courthouses across the country, while complaining that “people who truly LOVE our Country, and want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, are not allowed to ‘Peacefully Protest,’ and are rudely and systematically shut down and ushered off to far away ‘holding areas,’ essentially denying them their Constitutional Rights.”

On Wednesday Trump claimed, “The Courthouse area in Lower Manhattan is in a COMPLETE LOCKDOWN mode, not for reasons of safety, but because they don’t want any of the thousands of MAGA supporters to be present. If they did the same thing at Columbia, and other locations, there would be no problem with the protesters!”

After detailing several of his false claims about security measures prohibiting his followers from being able to show their support and protest, CNN published a fact-check on Wednesday:

“Trump’s claims are all false. The police have not turned away ‘thousands of people’ from the courthouse during his trial; only a handful of Trump supporters have shown up to demonstrate near the building,” CNN reported.

“And while there are various security measures in place in the area, including some street closures enforced by police officers and barricades, it’s not true that ‘for blocks you can’t get near this courthouse.’ In reality, the designated protest zone for the trial is at a park directly across the street from the courthouse – and, in addition, people are permitted to drive right up to the front of the courthouse and walk into the building, which remains open to the public. If people show up early enough in the morning, they can even get into the trial courtroom itself or the overflow room that shows near-live video of the proceedings.”

READ MORE: Justices’ Views on Trump Immunity Stun Experts: ‘Watching the Constitution Be Rewritten’

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.