Connect with us

Catholic League ‘Thought Experiment’ On ‘Weeding Out’ Unborn Gay Babies



Bill Donohue, president of the virulently anti-gay Catholic League, has little — or, from his way of thinking, too much — faith in the American people, and automatically assumed that if scientists found “the gay gene,” America’s expectant parents would opt to abort unborn gay babies — and “force” the government to pay the bill.

I disagree. Strongly.

I believe that Americans are not that hate-filled. I believe that if scientists found “the gay gene,” the vast majority of American babies diagnosed to have “it” would not be aborted.

“Here’s a thought experiment,” Donohue posits. “Suppose there is a gay gene, and suppose prospective parents can learn whether a gay gene is present in their unborn baby. Now suppose a president proposes that employee insurance carriers, including religious non-profits, must cover abortions in those instances where prospective parents elect to abort their gay-gene carrying unborn baby.”

We’ll assume Donohue, writing in his short piece, “Religious Liberty And The Gay Gene,” isn’t singling out unborn babies who carry “the gay gene” for a “thought experiment” because that would be wildly disgusting and offensive.

Donohue automatically assumes America would opt to abort unborn gay babies — because his “thought experiment” doesn’t work in his favor if that were not the underlying assumption.

And to be fair, Donohue is trying to make the case that the Obama administration decision to ensure contraception services are available to all women isn’t about contraception but about religious liberty, but the point stands when he writes:

There are several issues here for a survey to consider: preventive health care; the First Amendment right to religious liberty; the public funding of abortion; and the intentional weeding out of the homosexual population.

[Emphasis ours.]


But back to the issue at hand.

Clearly, Bill Donohue, who has never displayed an original thought, is channeling Ann Coulter circa September, 2010, who said, at a gay Republican group’s fundraiser:

Once [scientists] find the gay gene, guess who’s getting aborted?

Disgusting. And false.

Nice try, Ann, and Bill.

Because the people who hate gay people are also the people who hate abortion. And if Bill Donohue thinks that anti-abortion Americans would abort unborn children because they will be gay at birth, what does that say about Donohue, and the “pro-life movement”?

Which means, Bill, that you have no faith — zero — in your Catholic flock.

Not to mention, doesn’t this mean Donohue accepts the fact that homosexuality is genetic? Or does his “thought experiment” not go that far?

Truth be told, Catholics actually support the rights of the LGBT community and same-sex marriage at a higher rate than the average American.

Yes, Bill Donohue is virulently homophobic. It’s truly clouding his reasoning. And it’s truly disgusting.

Want to learn more about Bill Donohue and his Catholic League?

Hilary Rosen Latest Victim Of Catholic Attacks On Adoption

Super Bowl: Catholic League Now Believes It Owns Madonna

Time For Gay-Bashing Bill Donohue To Just Button His Lip

Catholic League: Jewish Rabbis Even Greater Abusers Than Catholic Priests

Victims Of Pedophile Priests Are “Pitiful Malcontents” Says Catholic League

Catholic League: AIDS Is A “Self-Inflicted Wound”

Catholic League Attacks Lady Gaga, Suggests She Wants To Get Raped

Catholic League’s Annual NYT Ad In Support Of Pedophile Priests

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.


‘Taking Us All for Fools’: Critics Decimate Greg Abbott’s Claims and Defense of His Actions in Wake of School Shooting



Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott in a press conference that left reporters frustrated defended his actions and insisted his earlier praise for law enforcement’s widely criticized response to the Uvalde school massacre was the result of being “misled.”

“I am livid about what happened,” Abbott declared, blaming others for his “recitation of what people in that room told me.”

Critics aren’t buying his claims.

Abbott, who’s in the middle of a heated re-election campaign, appeared extremely defensive when reporters asked him questions.

“Let’s be clear about one thing. None of the laws I signed this past session had any intersection with this crime at all,” Abbott told reporters when asked if he would call the legislature back for a special session, as The Texas Tribune’s Sewell Chan noted.

“No law that I signed allowed him to get a gun,” Abbott insisted.

“The answers fell pretty flat,” opined MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, who noted the press event lasted just 36 minutes, less time than the police officers “stood outside and did nothing,” which was 47 minutes.

Abbott ended the press conference with many reporters almost begging him to take more questions. As the governor got up and left one frustrated reporter was caught on a hot mic saying “unbelievable.”

Chan, who is the editor in chief of the Tribune, added on Twitter: “Abbott rejects background checks as a simplistic and ineffective fix. Wouldn’t have prevented Sutherland Springs and Santa Fe shootings, he says. Tries to turn focus to broken mental health system.”

Former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence Frank Figliuzzi on MSNBC delivered a strong rebuke to Governor Abbott’s remarks.

“No amount of free flights, no amount of free caskets, no amount of mental health counseling is going to bring back any one of those murdered children,” Figliuzzi said, referring to Abbott’s announcement an anonymous donor is putting up  $175,000 for funeral expenses of those who were murdered in the shooting and said the state will pay for mental health treatment.

Abbott also insisted that since Texas became a state it’s been legal for 18-year-olds to buy long guns.

Fred Guttenberg, whose daughter Jaime was murdered in the Parkland school shooting, blasted Abbott:

And long guns of today, as Figliuzzi noted, are often semi-automatic “killing machines.”

“The governor seems completely unable to understand that he can easily make a distinction when you’re talking about whether an 18-year-old should buy an assault rifle or not. And all he cares about is a century of history in Texas on long guns. We didn’t have the AR-15 style assault weapons back then.  He can easily make a distinction and say, ‘you can go hunting, here are the rifles you can do, you can buy, you can possess – and here’s an assault-style rifle.'”

“If he thinks that people are stupid and unable to understand that there is a clear distinction between a killing machine and a hunting rifle, that he’s taking us all for fools.”


Continue Reading


‘I Apologize for Interrupting Your Press Conference’: Tearful Texas Democrat Urges Greg Abbott to ‘Do Something’ on Guns



The Texas Democratic State Senator who represents Uvalde stood up during Greg Abbott’s Friday afternoon press conference and almost begged the Republican Governor to “do something” about gun violence after Tuesday’s massacre at Robb Elementary School that took 21 lives.

Abbott was trying to place the blame for the school shooting on mental health despite the gunman having no documented issues, and told attendees, “we’re focusing our attention on the wrong thing.”

That was not good enough for Democratic State Senator Roland Gutierrez, who politely introduced himself and said, “I’m not making a political speech.”

“My colleagues are asking for a special session, you’re getting a letter tomorrow,” from the Senate Democratic Caucus.

“We’ve asked for gun control changes – I’m asking you now, bring us back in three weeks.”

Gutierrez grew emotional, sounding as if he was choking up, and added, “I apologize for interrupting your press conference about the needs of this community. I’ve been here for three days with all of these elected officials – this county judge has been working his ass off,” he continued.

“I don’t know how to express the loss of the families that I’ve talked to,” he added.

“You have to do something, man,” Gutierrez said, all but begging the governor to take action, and saying his “own colleagues are calling me and telling me this is enough.”


Continue Reading


Watch: Right Wing Host at NRA Convention Likens 18 Year Olds Buying Guns to 3rd Graders Deciding Gender



A host from a right-wing streaming service covering the NRA convention in Houston decided to compare conservatives’ growing active opposition to the rights and existence of transgender people, to the majority of Americans demanding expanded gun control legislation.

“We are being told by the left that a third-grader has the knowledge to determine if they were born a boy or they were born a girl, whether or not they want to stay that gender that they were born with,” said Brian Glenn, Right Side Broadcasting’s director of programming and correspondent.

“And if we feel like at a third grade you can make decisions on your gender, then I think by the time you’re 18 you should have enough maturity – assuming you’re not a complete psychopath – to buy a handgun and exercise your Second Amendment.”

Of course, that hypothetical third-grader is harming exactly no one and later can reverse that decision if they choose, which the vast majority do not.

That hypothetical 18-year old, or, in the case of this week’s horrific tragedy, an actual 18-year old, buying two AR-15 style assault weapons and hundreds of rounds of ammunition within three days of their 18th birthday, gunning down 21 people including 19 elementary school children, cannot reverse any of those decisions.



Continue Reading


Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.