BREAKING: Gay Marriage Ban Is Unconstitutional? Federal Judge Rules Yes, In Part!
For months marriage equality advocates and opponents have been anxiously awaiting a decision on the federal Prop 8 trial, which many believe will render California’s Prop 8 unconstitutional in that state and lead to a Supreme Court challenge of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA.) But under the woodwork, as it were, another challenge to marriage inequality has been in the works, and just moments ago the case was decided, some believe rendering DOMA federally unconstitutional.
Via New England’s Bay Windows newspaper,
“In an enormous victory for same-sex marriage, a federal judge in Boston today (Thursday, July 8 ) ruled, in two separate cases, that a critical part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional.
“In one challenge brought by the state of Massachusetts, Judge Joseph Tauro ruled that Congress violated the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution when it passed DOMA and took from the states decisions concerning which couples can be considered married. In the other, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, he ruled DOMA violates the equal protection principles embodied in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.”
No doubt these decisions will be challenged and appealed to the Supreme Court, so we cannot expect marriage equality for all today. Even if DOMA is ultimately ruled unconstitutional, we will still need to win marriage state by state, as DOMA only allows states to decide marriage equality, and prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages. But these are huge wins for our cause, and hopefully will somehow influence the Prop 8 decision.
One legal question must be, if part of a statute violates part of the Constitution, is that entire statute unconstitutional?
Maggie Gallagher must be thrilled. Think of all the cash she’ll be taking in now.

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |