Connect with us

Op-Ed

Targeting Minorities: NYPD And ‘Stop And Frisk’ Go On Trial Today In Federal Court

Published

on

Fighting for a New York where being young, black, gay and “dancing under the influence of Beyonce” isn’t treated like a crimeÂ

 

The New Civil Rights Movement is pleased to publish this important op-ed by guest author Annette Dickerson, Director of Education and Outreach at the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) about the NYPD’s notorious “stop and frisk” practices.

 

Today the New York City Police Department goes on trial. After more than a decade of stopping and frisking literally millions of New Yorkers, the tables have been turned and the NYPD will have to account for its actions. Floyd v. City of New York is a class-action lawsuit, brought by the Center for Constitutional Rights, that charges that the stop-and-frisk program is racially discriminatory and unconstitutional. While 53 percent of New York City’s population is Black and Latino, 87 percent of those stopped are Black and Latino.

Police are stopping people not based on reasonable suspicion that they have done anything wrong, in other words, but because of who they are. Legally, the case is about the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race (among other things), and about the Fourth Amendment’s ban against unreasonable searches and seizures. But in the bigger picture, it’s about what kind of city we live in: one where the police treat entire swaths of the population as presumptive suspects, or one where all New Yorkers are treated as equally entitled to walk the streets of their city without being harassed.

It is not just black and brown New Yorkers who are affected. LGBT people young people, poor people, Arab and South Asian people and Muslims are also targets. And it is often at the intersection of communities that the oppression of stop and frisk is most felt. Last year theCenter for Constitutional Rights documented the experiences of various New York communities at the hands of the police, including LGBT communities. “I know I can get arrested just for walking the street,” one woman told us. “’Cause if I’m walking with my friend, they just assume I’m a prostitute, that I’m a sex worker, or just because I’m a Hispanic transgender woman, because of my gender, I can just get arrested.” These and other stories are collected in our report Stop and Frisk: The Human Impact.

The struggle to end abusive policing is an old one, and the movement specifically to stop stop and frisk has grown tremendously in the last decade. The legal effort to end unconstitutional stop-and-frisk practices is only one part of the work. CCR is part of Communities United for Police Reform (CPR), a coalition of dozens of organizations doing grassroots work to bring accountability to the NYPD. Among the coalition members, several focus on aiding and advocating for LGBT youth of color.

Chris Bilal, a community activist, blogger and staff member at one of those organizations, Streetwise and Safe, was stopped by the NYPD, together with some friends, last year while dancing in Marcus Garvey Park.

Â

http://fora.tv/embed?id=15448&type=c

NYPD’s Stop and Frisk Policy from Culture Project on FORA.tv

Three officers, flashlights drawn, began questioning us for no reason at all, and demanding that we produce identification, again for no reason at all. Surely dancing under the influence of Beyonce isn’t probable cause to believe any crime has taken place.

After a bunch of vague questions disconnected from real pretense…the officers were then curious about what was in our bags. Now, I have been trained not to consent to unlawful searches like this, but I actually offered them my bag just so their intimidation would be short. I learned early that when someone is robbing you, it’s best to quickly give them the money and not put up a fight. I didn’t want to end up the young black shooting victim mourned on someone else’s blog. As the experienced person between a person who wanted to exercise their rights and the people who find joy in taking them away, I chose to err on the side of caution and begged my friends to give them their bags so we all could go home that night.

I breathed a personal sigh of relief that I wasn’t carrying condoms on me that day. They could have used them as justification to take us all downtown, like they do so many other gay people of color in the city, on some dumb charge of loitering for the purposes of prostitution.

After it became clear that we were being profiled as sexual deviants because we were three young black gay men in a Harlem park, we left, humiliated in our own community….But I still believe that parks should be where people go to be free, have fun and not be harassed by police for simply dancing.

This is the New York Floyd is challenging, one were young people are profiled, humiliated, harassed in their own community for being black or gay or both. You can read more about the case on CCR’s website.

Â

This piece marks the beginning of a series of articles that CCR is contributing to The New Civil Rights Movement about their legal work, which addresses some of the most important civil rights and civil liberties of our time. We send our deep thanks to Vince Warren, the Executive Director of CCR, and his talented and dedicated staff.

Annette Dickerson is the Director of Education and Outreach at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Â

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Op-Ed

Op-Ed: Think Twice Before Attacking Pelosi

Published

on

The idea that President Trump should be impeached is appealing to many. After all, he is a scumbag with zero ethics who doesn’t know the meaning of the word integrity. He has lied to the American people and is hurting our country and making the world a more dangerous place. So, yes, let’s move to impeach seems to be a rational thing to say.

But impeachment is more than finding the votes in the House of Representatives to pass articles of impeachment. That has been done twice before in our history. The House has voted articles of impeachment for two previous presidents: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. I believe the House could do it again for Trump. But let us not forget in those previous cases the Senate refused to convict and acquitted them both and they continued to serve as president.

In the wake of the House voting to approve two articles of impeachment for Clinton his approval rating in polls went up by 10 percent. So there is a political reason to consider if voting to impeach Trump would do the same for him. Would the public at large, not just Democrats, feel Trump’s crimes are much more serious or would impeachment generate feelings among a large bloc of voters that Congress is only acting for political reasons.

Continue reading the full op-ed at The Washington Blade.

Peter Rosenstein is a community and Democratic activist based in Washington, DC, where he appears in the media as a commentator on issues including LGBT rights, politics and education. His columns may be found here

NCRM from time to time publishes op-eds reflecting the wide diversity of our community’s views and beliefs. They do not necessarily reflect NCRM’s positions.

Continue Reading

Op-Ed

Democrats, This Is Why We Need Nancy Pelosi

Published

on

Democrats Continuing to Fight Pelosi Are Doing the Work of the Republican Party

To all those Democrats who are still opposing Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, it’s time to wake up. This is not the time to toss overboard the person who has the experience and skills to hold the new Democratic coalition together. 

Some newly elected progressive Democrats like Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez originally suggested Nancy Pelosi isn’t progressive enough for them. She now has changed her position and endorsed her, obviously realizing Republicans have been attacking Leader Pelosi for years as a “San Francisco liberal,” too progressive for the country. 

Democrats like Rep. Seth Moulton, leading the charge to get rid of Pelosi, have a lot to learn. At a recent town hall the women of his district tried to educate him and pushed back.

A new class of Democrats got elected, and now they need to learn how to pass legislation. Pelosi, a recognized environmentalist, supporter of the rights of minorities, women and the LGBTQ+ community, can teach them how to do that. She understands the federal budget and the process needed to move legislation through the House even in tough times, and is rightfully credited with corralling the votes needed to pass the Affordable Care Act. She is a master strategist and fundraiser. Many of the candidates who now oppose her won their races with money she helped raise.

Recently Pelosi spoke at the Institute for Politics at the Kennedy School at Harvard. Those who oppose her should listen to what she said.

She “ticked off a legislative to-do list including lowering health care costs, spearheading a national infrastructure plan and pushing for changes to campaign finance laws,” and she talked about introducing gun control legislation.

“The California Democrat said she wasn’t worried about Democrats campaigning for the House in part by opposing her as speaker, telling candidates: ‘Do whatever you have to do, just win, baby.'”

Pelosi needs 218 votes in the House to be elected Speaker. There will be 234 or 235 Democrats in the House on January 3, 2019, so Pelosi can afford to lose the votes of a few. Sixteen Democrats recently signed a letter to oppose her and one, Brian Higgins (D-NY) has already changed his mind and endorsed her. Marcia Fudge (D-OH), who considered opposing her has now endorsed her.  

Pelosi is proving the master strategist and will secure the needed votes. She has been endorsed by most progressive groups and the most respected Democrat in the country, President Barack Obama. He said of her, “I think Nancy Pelosi, when the history is written, will go down as one of the most effective legislative leaders that this country’s ever seen.”

He added, “Nancy is not always the best on a cable show or with a quick soundbite or what have you, but her skill, tenacity, toughness, vision, is remarkable. Her stamina, her ability to see around corners, her ability to stand her ground and do hard things and to suffer unpopularity to get the right thing done, I think, stands up against any person that I’ve observed or worked directly with in Washington during my lifetime. What’s most important are the ‘nuts and bolts’ of governance; the blocking and tackling involved in actually getting things across the finish line and my experience has been that Nancy Pelosi knows how to do that, and she was an extraordinary partner for me throughout my presidency.” 

Democrats continuing to fight Pelosi are doing the work of the Republican Party.

The infighting will hurt the ability of Democrats to move forward a coordinated agenda. They might also keep in mind when Pelosi wins and she will, she appoints committee chairs, controls committee assignments, and decides what bills come to the floor. 

Democrats need to bring a new generation into leadership positions and Pelosi should have done that before. She can do it now by expanding the leadership. If Democrats take back the Senate and the White House in 2020 we can have this debate again. Now is not the time. 

Now Democrats must unite, not an easy task, as they have the most diverse caucus ever elected. Some districts elected progressives, others elected moderates. They will all need something to take back to their districts when they are up for reelection in 2020. The only person who can help them go home with what they need is Nancy Pelosi. She is a proven winner, a proven master of strategy. She knows how the House of Representatives works and is the master at bending it to her will – in this case to the will of Democrats across the nation.

Peter Rosenstein is a community and Democratic activist based in Washington, DC, where he appears in the media as a commentator on issues including LGBT rights, politics and education. His columns may be found here

Image via Wikimedia

Continue Reading

Op-Ed

‘Rainbow Wave’ May Decide Florida Races

Published

on

1.3 Million Florida Voters Saying Candidates’ Positions on LGBTQ Rights Are Important Are a Game-Changing Voting Bloc

At a time of renewed political attacks on LGBT Americans, the pro-equality vote — the ‘Rainbow Wave’ — may prove decisive in Florida’s midterm election.

Candidates ignore this growing voting bloc at their peril.

Equality Florida has invested deeply in connecting with voters for whom LGBT rights are the motivating issue.

We have identified 1.3 million voters in Florida for whom a candidate’s positions on marriage equality, gay and transgender workplace protections, and LGBT youth are definitive. We represent a game-changing voting bloc in a state where fewer than 65,000 votes decided the last two races for Governor.

This cycle, we’ve run our largest ever campaign to turn out pro-equality voters with mail and phone programs targeting hundreds of thousands of voters in support of more than 110 endorsed candidates, including Andrew Gillum.

There are so many reasons for LGBT people and our allies to vote: The Trump administration’s relentless attacks on the transgender community, businesses refusing to serve LGBT individuals, and Gov. Rick Scott’s broken promise to protect LGBT state workers after the massacre at Pulse Nightclub are all top of mind.

And in the race for Florida Governor, a longtime pro-LGBT champion, Mayor Gillum, faces Ron DeSantis a former congressman with one of the worst records on LGBT rights in the U.S. Congress.

For the past 12 months, Equality Florida Action PAC, the only statewide political committee working to elect pro-equality candidates at the state and local level, has been testing and fine-tuning our strategies. Through local and special elections, we’ve proven that pro-equality voters can shift the electoral landscape and provide the margin of difference.

No clearer example of this can be found than this year’s primary election in Florida Senate District 38.

Embattled anti-equality incumbent Sen. Daphne Campbell faced off against political newcomer Jason Pizzo. Equality Florida Action PAC committed $25,000 and the full force of our political apparatus to elect Pizzo. We turned out volunteers to knock on doors, funded mail pieces contrasting the candidates’ positions on LGBT issues, and ran digital ads supporting our endorsed champion.

Campbell’s anti-LGBT record became a defining, headline-grabbing issue in the lead up to primary Election Day, including a memorable moment during a televised debate where while clutching a copy of our mailer she said: “The gays have their rights and I have mine.”

Pizzo won by 9 points.

Whether it’s the Senate District 38 primary, the 2018 St. Petersburg Mayor’s race, or the race for Governor of Florida, the battle for LGBT rights puts defining markers on the playing field.

Will we build a Florida of inclusion and prosperity or a Florida mired in the Trump era politics of division and exclusion? For a growing and bipartisan coalition of voters, a candidate’s positions on LGBT rights tells them all they need to know about which side of this divide a candidate stands on.

The days of using LGBT issues as a wedge are waning.

Failure to support basic LGBT protections is a liability. Some candidates, including DeSantis, try to have it both ways. They mute their public attacks, while voting to please the dwindling but fervent extremist base.

But the candidates who fully embrace equality are the ones thriving in this emerging electorate.

Gillum, who has been an unflinching advocate of equality for decades leads, unites and speaks to the values of equality and fairness, while DeSantis has no platform beyond slavish devotion to Trump. Even Donald Trump waved the rainbow flag and claimed support on LGBT issues during the campaign. Of course, it was one of many lies, but the political calculus that led him to lie proves the current place of LGBT equality in the electorate.

The rainbow wave of 2018 has been decades in the making. In the remaining days, we’ll work to unleash the power of the LGBT and pro-equality allies’ vote, to hold accountable elected leaders like DeSantis who place a target on us and our families, and to elect champions like Gillum who represent the future of Florida and the South.

Guest Author Nadine Smith is the executive director of Equality Florida/Equality Florida Institute.

This article has been reprinted with the author’s permission.

Image by Ted Eytan via Flickr and a CC license

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.