Connect with us

Full Text and Video: Clinton Warns Trump Is ‘Helping a Radical Fringe Take Over’

Published

on

Clinton Details Trump’s Alt-Right, White Supremacist Ties

Thursday afternoon Hillary Clinton delivered a historic speech repeatedly pounding Donald Trump for his ties to racism, white supremacism, and the alt-right movement.

Clinton warned supporters, “there’s always been a paranoid fringe in our politics, steeped in racial resentment. But it’s never had the nominee of a major party stoking it, encouraging it, and giving it a national megaphone. Until now.” 

WATCH: Clinton Says Trump ‘Would Put Prejudice Into Practice’ and Wants to ‘Make America Hate Again’

“This is a moment of reckoning for every Republican dismayed that the Party of Lincoln has become the Party of Trump. It’s a moment of reckoning for all of us who love our country and believe that America is better than this.”

Below, the full text of her remarks, as prepared for delivery, and the full video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP6Q-OEXm4k

Thank you, Reno!  It’s great to be back in Nevada…

 

My original plan for this visit was to focus on our agenda to help small businesses and entrepreneurs. 

This week we proposed new steps to cut red tape and taxes, and make it easier for small businesses to get the credit they need to grow and hire. 

 

Because I believe that in America, if you can dream it, you should be able to build it.  

 

We’ll be talking a lot more about our economic plans in the days and weeks ahead.

 

But today, I want to address something I hear from Americans all over our country. 

 

Everywhere I go, people tell me how concerned they are by the divisive rhetoric coming from my opponent in this election. 

 

It’s like nothing we’ve heard before from a nominee for President of the United States.

 

From the start, Donald Trump has built his campaign on prejudice and paranoia. 

 

He’s taking hate groups mainstream and helping a radical fringe take over one of America’s two major political parties. 

 

His disregard for the values that make our country great is profoundly dangerous. 

 

In just the past week, under the guise of “outreach” to African Americans, Trump has stood up in front of largely white audiences and described black communities in insulting and ignorant terms:  

 

“Poverty.  Rejection.  Horrible education.  No housing.  No homes.  No ownership. 

Crime at levels nobody has seen… Right now, you walk down the street, you get shot.” 

 

Those are his words. 

 

Donald Trump misses so much. 

 

He doesn’t see the success of black leaders in every field…

 

The vibrancy of black-owned businesses…Or the strength of the black church… He doesn’t see the excellence of historically black colleges and universities or the pride of black parents watching their children thrive…And he certainly doesn’t have any solutions to take on the reality of systemic racism and create more equity and opportunity in communities of color.

 

It takes a lot of nerve to ask people he’s ignored and mistreated for decades, “What do you have to lose?”  The answer is everything!

 

Trump’s lack of knowledge or experience or solutions would be bad enough. 

But what he’s doing here is more sinister. 

 

Trump is reinforcing harmful stereotypes and offering a dog whistle to his most hateful supporters.

 

It’s a disturbing preview of what kind of President he’d be. 

 

This is what I want to make clear today:

 

A man with a long history of racial discrimination, who traffics in dark conspiracy theories drawn from the pages of supermarket tabloids and the far reaches of the internet, should never run our government or command our military. 

 

If he doesn’t respect all Americans, how can he serve all Americans?

 

Now, I know some people still want to give Trump the benefit of the doubt.  

They hope that he will eventually reinvent himself – that there’s a kinder, gentler, more responsible Donald Trump waiting in the wings somewhere. 

 

After all, it’s hard to believe anyone – let alone a nominee for President of the United States – could really believe all the things he says.  

 

But the hard truth is, there’s no other Donald Trump.  This is it. 

 

Maya Angelou once said:  “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.” 

 

Well, throughout his career and this campaign, Donald Trump has shown us exactly who he is.  We should believe him.

 

When Trump was getting his start in business, he was sued by the Justice Department for refusing to rent apartments to black and Latino tenants. 

 

Their applications would be marked with a “C” – “C” for “colored” – and then rejected.  

 

Three years later, the Justice Department took Trump back to court because he hadn’t changed.

 

The pattern continued through the decades. 

 

State regulators fined one of Trump’s casinos for repeatedly removing black dealers from the floor.  No wonder the turn-over rate for his minority employees was way above average.

 

And let’s not forget Trump first gained political prominence leading the charge for the so-called “Birthers.”  

 

He promoted the racist lie that President Obama isn’t really an American citizen – part of a sustained effort to delegitimize America’s first black President.

 

In 2015, Trump launched his own campaign for President with another racist lie.  He described Mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals. 

And he accused the Mexican government of actively sending them across the border.   None of that is true.

 

Oh, and by the way, Mexico’s not paying for his wall either.  

If it ever gets built, you can be sure that American taxpayers will be stuck with the bill.

 

Since then, there’s been a steady stream of bigotry. 

 

We all remember when Trump said a distinguished federal judge born in Indiana couldn’t be trusted to do his job because, quote, “He’s a Mexican.” 

 

Think about that. 

 

The man who today is the standard bearer of the Republican Party said a federal judge was incapable of doing his job solely because of his heritage. 

 

Even the Republican Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, described that as “the textbook definition of a racist comment.”

 

To this day, he’s never apologized to Judge Curiel.

 

But for Trump, that’s just par for the course.

 

This is someone who retweets white supremacists online, like the user who goes by the name “white-genocide-TM.”   Trump took this fringe bigot with a few dozen followers and spread his message to 11 million people.

 

His campaign famously posted an anti-Semitic image – a Star of David imposed over a sea of dollar bills – that first appeared on a white supremacist website.

 

The Trump campaign also selected a prominent white nationalist leader as a delegate in California.  They only dropped him under pressure.

 

When asked in a nationally televised interview whether he would disavow the support of David Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, Trump wouldn’t do it.  Only later, again under mounting pressure, did he backtrack.

 

And when Trump was asked about anti-Semitic slurs and death threats coming from his supporters, he refused to condemn them.

 

Through it all, he has continued pushing discredited conspiracy theories with racist undertones.

 

Trump said thousands of American Muslims in New Jersey cheered the 9/11 attacks.  They didn’t. 

 

He suggested that Ted Cruz’s father was involved in the Kennedy assassination.  Perhaps in Trump’s mind, because he was a Cuban immigrant, he must have had something to do with it.  Of course there’s absolutely no evidence of that.

 

Just recently, Trump claimed President Obama founded ISIS.  And then he repeated that nonsense over and over.

 

His latest paranoid fever dream is about my health.  All I can say is, Donald, dream on. 

 

This is what happens when you treat the National Enquirer like Gospel.

 

It’s what happens when you listen to the radio host Alex Jones, who claims that 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombings were inside jobs.  He said the victims of the Sandy Hook massacre were child actors and no one was actually killed there.

 

Trump didn’t challenge those lies.  He went on Jones’ show and said: “Your reputation is amazing.  I will not let you down.”

 

This man wants to be President of the United States.

 

I’ve stood by President Obama’s side as he made the toughest decisions a Commander-in-Chief ever has to make. 

 

In times of crisis, our country depends on steady leadership… clear thinking… and calm judgment… because one wrong move can mean the difference between life and death.   

 

The last thing we need in the Situation Room is a loose cannon who can’t tell the difference between fact and fiction, and who buys so easily into racially-tinged rumors. 

 

Someone detached from reality should never be in charge of making decisions that are as real as they come.

 

It’s another reason why Donald Trump is simply temperamentally unfit to be President of the United States.

 

Now, some people will say that his bluster and bigotry is just over-heated campaign rhetoric – an outrageous person saying outrageous things for attention. 

 

But look at the policies Trump has proposed.  They would put prejudice into practice.

 

And don’t be distracted by his latest attempts to muddy the waters. 

 

He may have some new people putting new words in his mouth… but we know where he stands.

 

He would form a deportation force to round up millions of immigrants and kick them out of the country.

 

He’d abolish the bedrock constitutional principle that says if you’re born in the United States, you’re an American citizen.  He says that children born in America to undocumented parents are, quote, “anchor babies” and should be deported. 

Millions of them. 

 

And he’d ban Muslims around the world – 1.5 billion men, women, and children –from entering our country just because of their religion.

 

Think about that for a minute.  How would it actually work?  People landing in U.S. airports would line up to get their passports stamped, just like they do now. 

But in Trump’s America, when they step up to the counter, the immigration officer would ask every single person, “What is your religion?”

 

And then what? 

 

What if someone says, “I’m a Christian,” but the agent doesn’t believe them. 

Do they have to prove it?  How would they do that? 

 

Ever since the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock, America has distinguished itself as a haven for people fleeing religious persecution. 

 

Under Donald Trump, America would distinguish itself as the only country in the world to impose a religious test at the border.

 

Come to think of it, there actually may be one place that does that.  It’s the so-called Islamic State.  The territory ISIS controls.  It would be a cruel irony if America followed its lead.

 

Don’t worry, some will say, as President, Trump will be surrounded by smart advisors who will rein in his worst impulses. 

 

So when a tweet gets under his skin and he wants to retaliate with a cruise missile, maybe cooler heads will be there to convince him not to. 

 

Maybe. 

 

But look at who he’s put in charge of his campaign.

 

Trump likes to say he only hires the “best people.”  But he’s had to fire so many campaign managers it’s like an episode of the Apprentice. 

 

The latest shake-up was designed to – quote – “Let Trump be Trump.” To do that, he hired Stephen Bannon, the head of a right-wing website called Breitbart.com, as campaign CEO. 

 

To give you a flavor of his work, here are a few headlines they’ve published:

 

“Birth Control Makes Women Unattractive and Crazy.” 

 

“Would You Rather Your Child Had Feminism or Cancer?”

 

“Gabby Giffords: The Gun Control Movement’s Human Shield”

 

“Hoist It High And Proud: The Confederate Flag Proclaims A Glorious Heritage.” 

 

That one came shortly after the Charleston massacre, when Democrats and Republicans alike were doing everything they could to heal racial divides. Breitbart tried to enflame them further.

 

Just imagine – Donald Trump reading that and thinking: “this is what I need more of in my campaign.”

 

Bannon has nasty things to say about pretty much everyone. 

 

This spring, he railed against Paul Ryan for, quote “rubbing his social-justice Catholicism in my nose every second.” 

 

No wonder he’s gone to work for Trump – the only Presidential candidate ever to get into a public feud with the Pope.

 

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups, Breitbart embraces “ideas on the extremist fringe of the conservative right.  Racist ideas. 

Race-baiting ideas.  Anti-Muslim and anti-Immigrant ideas –– all key tenets making up an emerging racist ideology known as the ‘Alt-Right.’”

 

Alt-Right is short for “Alternative Right.” 

 

The Wall Street Journal describes it as a loosely organized movement, mostly online, that “rejects mainstream conservatism, promotes nationalism and views immigration and multiculturalism as threats to white identity.”

 

The de facto merger between Breitbart and the Trump Campaign represents a landmark achievement for the “Alt-Right.”  A fringe element has effectively taken over the Republican Party.   

This is part of a broader story — the rising tide of hardline, right-wing nationalism around the world. 

 

Just yesterday, one of Britain’s most prominent right-wing leaders, Nigel Farage, who stoked anti-immigrant sentiments to win the referendum on leaving the European Union, campaigned with Donald Trump in Mississippi. 

 

Farage has called for a ban on the children of legal immigrants from public schools and health services, has said women are quote “worth less” than men, and supports scrapping laws that prevent employers from discriminating based on race — that’s who Trump wants by his side.

 

The godfather of this global brand of extreme nationalism is Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

 

In fact, Farage has appeared regularly on Russian propaganda programs. 

Now he’s standing on the same stage as the Republican nominee.  

 

Trump himself heaps praise on Putin and embrace pro-Russian policies.

He talks casually of abandoning our NATO allies, recognizing Russia’s annexation of Crimea, and of giving the Kremlin a free hand in Eastern Europe more generally. 

 

American presidents from Truman to Reagan have rejected the kind of approach Trump is taking on Russia. 

We should, too. 

 

All of this adds up to something we’ve never seen before.

 

Of course there’s always been a paranoid fringe in our politics, steeped in racial resentment.  But it’s never had the nominee of a major party stoking it, encouraging it, and giving it a national megaphone.  Until now.  

 

On David Duke’s radio show the other day, the mood was jubilant. 

“We appear to have taken over the Republican Party,” one white supremacist said. 

Duke laughed.  There’s still more work to do, he said.

 

No one should have any illusions about what’s really going on here.  The names may have changed… Racists now call themselves “racialists.”  White supremacists now call themselves “white nationalists.”  The paranoid fringe now calls itself “alt-right.”  But the hate burns just as bright. 

 

And now Trump is trying to rebrand himself as well.  Don’t be fooled. 

 

There’s an old Mexican proverb that says “Tell me with whom you walk, and I will tell you who you are.”

 

We know who Trump is.  A few words on a teleprompter won’t change that.

 

He says he wants to “make America great again,” but his real message remains “Make America hate again.”

 

This isn’t just about one election.  It’s about who we are as a nation. 

It’s about the kind of example we want to set for our children and grandchildren.

 

Next time you watch Donald Trump rant on television, think about all the kids listening across our country.  They hear a lot more than we think.

  

Parents and teachers are already worried about what they’re calling the “Trump Effect.” 

 

Bullying and harassment are on the rise in our schools, especially targeting students of color, Muslims, and immigrants.  

 

At a recent high school basketball game in Indiana, white students held up Trump signs and taunted Latino players on the opposing team with chants of “Build the wall!” and “Speak English.” 

 

After a similar incident in Iowa, one frustrated school principal said, “They see it in a presidential campaign and now it’s OK for everyone to say this.”

 

We wouldn’t tolerate that kind of behavior in our own homes.  How can we stand for it from a candidate for president? 

 

This is a moment of reckoning for every Republican dismayed that the Party of Lincoln has become the Party of Trump.  It’s a moment of reckoning for all of us who love our country and believe that America is better than this. 

 

Twenty years ago, when Bob Dole accepted the Republican nomination, he pointed to the exits and told any racists in the Party to get out.

 

The week after 9/11, George W. Bush went to a mosque and declared for everyone to hear that Muslims “love America just as much as I do.”

 

In 2008, John McCain told his own supporters they were wrong about the man he was trying to defeat.  Senator McCain made sure they knew – Barack Obama is an American citizen and “a decent person.”

 

We need that kind of leadership again.

 

Every day, more Americans are standing up and saying “enough is enough” – including a lot of Republicans.  I’m honored to have their support. 

 

And I promise you this: with your help, I will be a President for Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.  For those who vote for me and those who don’t. 

For all Americans.

 

Because I believe we are stronger together.

 

It’s a vision for the future rooted in our values and reflected in a rising generation of young people who are the most open, diverse, and connected we’ve ever seen. 

 

Just look at our fabulous Olympic team. 

Like Ibtihaj Muhammad, an African-American Muslim from New Jersey who won the bronze medal in fencing with grace and skill.  Would she even have a place in Donald Trump’s America?

 

When I was growing up, Simone Manuel wouldn’t have been allowed to swim in the same public pool as Katie Ledecky.  Now they’re winning Olympic medals as teammates. 

 

So let’s keep moving forward together. 

 

Let’s stand up against prejudice and paranoia. 

 

Let’s prove once again, that America is great because is America is good.

 

Thank you, and may God bless the United States.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

OPINION

Noem Defends Shooting Her 14-Month Old Puppy to Death, Brags She Has Media ‘Gasping’

Published

on

Republican Governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota, a top potential Trump vice presidential running mate pick, revealed in a forthcoming book she “hated” her 14-month old puppy and shot it to death. Massive online outrage ensued, including accusations of “animal cruelty” and “cold-blooded murder,” but the pro-life former member of Congress is defending her actions and bragging she had the media “gasping.”

“Cricket was a wirehair pointer, about 14 months old,” Noem writes in her soon-to-be released book, according to The Guardian which reports “the dog, a female, had an ‘aggressive personality’ and needed to be trained to be used for hunting pheasant.”

“By taking Cricket on a pheasant hunt with older dogs, Noem says, she hoped to calm the young dog down and begin to teach her how to behave. Unfortunately, Cricket ruined the hunt, going ‘out of her mind with excitement, chasing all those birds and having the time of her life’.”

“Then, on the way home after the hunt, as Noem stopped to talk to a local family, Cricket escaped Noem’s truck and attacked the family’s chickens, ‘grabb[ing] one chicken at a time, crunching it to death with one bite, then dropping it to attack another’.”

READ MORE: President Hands Howard Stern Live Interview After NY Times Melts Down Over Biden Brush-Off

“Cricket the untrainable dog, Noem writes, behaved like ‘a trained assassin’.”

Except Cricket wasn’t trained. Online several people with experience training dogs have said Noem did everything wrong.

“I hated that dog,” Noem wrote, calling the young girl pup “untrainable,” “dangerous to anyone she came in contact with,” and “less than worthless … as a hunting dog.”

“At that moment,” Noem wrote, “I realized I had to put her down.”

“It was not a pleasant job,” she added, “but it had to be done. And after it was over, I realized another unpleasant job needed to be done.”

The Guardian reports Noem went on that day to slaughter a goat that “smelled ‘disgusting, musky, rancid’ and ‘loved to chase’ Noem’s children, knocking them down and ruining their clothes.”

She dragged both animals separately into a gravel pit and shot them one at a time. The puppy died after one shell, but the goat took two.

On social media Noem expressed no regret, no sadness, no empathy for the animals others say did not need to die, and certainly did not need to die so cruelly.

READ MORE: ‘Assassination of Political Rivals as an Official Act’: AOC Warns Take Trump ‘Seriously’

But she did use the opportunity to promote her book.

Attorney and legal analyst Jeffrey Evan Gold says Governor Noem’s actions might have violated state law.

“You slaughtered a 14-month-old puppy because it wasn’t good at the ‘job’ you chose for it?” he asked. “SD § 40-1-2.3. ‘No person owning or responsible for the care of an animal may neglect, abandon, or mistreat the animal.'”

The Democratic National Committee released a statement saying, “Kristi Noem’s extreme record goes beyond bizarre rants about killing her pets – she also previously said a 10-year-old rape victim should be forced to carry out her pregnancy, does not support exceptions for rape or incest, and has threatened to throw pharmacists in jail for providing medication abortions.”

Former Trump White House Director of Strategic Communications Alyssa Farah Griffin, now a co-host on “The View” wrote, “There are countless organizations that re-home dogs from owners who are incapable of properly training and caring for them.”

The Lincoln Project’s Rick Wilson blasted the South Dakota governor.

“Kristi Noem is trash,” he began. “Decades with hunting- and bird-dogs, and the number I’ve killed because they were chicken-sharp or had too much prey drive is ZERO. Puppies need slow exposure to birds, and bird-scent.”

“She killed a puppy because she was lazy at training bird dogs, not because it was a bad dog,” he added. “Not every dog is for the field, but 99.9% of them are trainable or re-homeable. We have one now who was never going in the field, but I didn’t kill her. She’s sleeping on the couch. You down old dogs, hurt dogs, and sick dogs humanely, not by shooting them and tossing them in a gravel pit. Unsporting and deliberately cruel…but she wrote this to prove the cruelty is the point.”

Melissa Jo Peltier, a writer and producer of the “Dog Whisperer with Cesar Millan” series, also heaped strong criticism on Noem.

“After 10+ years working with Cesar Millan & other highly specialized trainers, I believe NO dog should be put down just because they can’t or won’t do what we decide WE want them to,” Peltier said in a lengthy statement. “Dogs MUST be who they are. Sadly, that’s often who WE teach them to be. And our species is a hot mess. I would have happily taken Kristi Noem’s puppy & rehomed it. What she did is animal cruelty & cold blooded murder in my book.”

READ MORE: ‘Blood on Your Hands’: Tennessee Republicans OK Arming Teachers After Deadly School Shooting

Continue Reading

OPINION

President Hands Howard Stern Live Interview After NY Times Melts Down Over Biden Brush-Off

Published

on

President Joe Biden gave an nearly-unannounced, last-minute, live exclusive interview Friday morning to Howard Stern, the SiriusXM radio host who for decades, from the mid-1990s to about 2015, was a top Trump friend, fan, and aficionado. But the impetus behind the President’s move appears to be a rare and unsigned statement from the The New York Times Company, defending the “paper of record” after months of anger from the public over what some say is its biased negative coverage of the Biden presidency and, especially, a Thursday report by Politico claiming Times Publisher A.G. Sulzberger is furious the President has refused to give the “Grey Lady” an in-person  interview.

“The Times’ desire for a sit-down interview with Biden by the newspaper’s White House team is no secret around the West Wing or within the D.C. bureau,” Politico reported. “Getting the president on the record with the paper of record is a top priority for publisher A.G. Sulzberger. So much so that last May, when Vice President Kamala Harris arrived at the newspaper’s midtown headquarters for an off-the-record meeting with around 40 Times journalists, Sulzberger devoted several minutes to asking her why Biden was still refusing to grant the paper — or any major newspaper — an interview.”

“In Sulzberger’s view,” Politico explained, “only an interview with a paper like the Times can verify that the 81-year-old Biden is still fit to hold the presidency.”

But it was this statement that made Politico’s scoop go viral.

READ MORE: Justices’ Views on Trump Immunity Stun Experts: ‘Watching the Constitution Be Rewritten’

“’All these Biden people think that the problem is Peter Baker or whatever reporter they’re mad at that day,’ one Times journalist said. ‘It’s A.G. He’s the one who is pissed [that] Biden hasn’t done any interviews and quietly encourages all the tough reporting on his age.'”

Popular Information founder Judd Legum in March documented The New York Times’ (and other top papers’) obsession with Biden’s age after the Hur Report.

Thursday evening the Times put out a “scorching” statement, as Politico later reported, not on the newspaper’s website but on the company’s corporate website, not addressing the Politico piece directly but calling it “troubling” that President Biden “has so actively and effectively avoided questions from independent journalists during his term.”

Media watchers and critics pushed back on the Times’ statement.

READ MORE: ‘To Do God Knows What’: Local Elections Official Reads Lara Trump the Riot Act

“NYT issues an unprecedented statement slamming Biden for ‘actively and effectively avoid[ing] questions from independent journalists during his term’ and claiming it’s their ‘independence’ that Biden dislikes, when it’s actually that they’re dying to trip him up,” wrote media critic Dan Froomkin, editor of Press Watch.

Froomkin also pointed to a 2017 report from Poynter, a top journalism site published by The Poynter Institute, that pointed out the poor job the Times did of interviewing then-President Trump.

Others, including former Biden Deputy Secretary of State Brian McKeon, debunked the Times’ claim President Biden hasn’t given interviews to independent journalists by pointing to Biden’s interviews with CBS News’ “60 Minutes” and a 20-minute sit-down interview with veteran journalist John Harwood for ProPublica.

Former Chicago Sun-Times editor Mark Jacob, now a media critic who publishes Stop the Presses, offered a more colorful take of Biden’s decision to go on Howard Stern.

The Times itself just last month reported on a “wide-ranging interview” President Biden gave to The New Yorker.

Watch the video and read the social media posts above or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Doesn’t Care if Pregnant Women Live or Die’: Alito Slammed Over Emergency Abortion Remarks

 

 

Continue Reading

News

CNN Smacks Down Trump Rant Courthouse So ‘Heavily Guarded’ MAGA Cannot Attend His Trial

Published

on

Donald Trump’s Friday morning claim Manhattan’s Criminal Courts Building is “heavily guarded” so his supporters cannot attend his trial was torched by a top CNN anchor. The ex-president, facing 34 felony charges in New York, had been urging his followers to show up and protest on the courthouse steps, but few have.

“I’m at the heavily guarded Courthouse. Security is that of Fort Knox, all so that MAGA will not be able to attend this trial, presided over by a highly conflicted pawn of the Democrat Party. It is a sight to behold! Getting ready to do my Courthouse presser. Two minutes!” Trump wrote Friday morning on his Truth Social account.

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins supplied a different view.

“Again, the courthouse is open the public. The park outside, where a handful of his supporters have gathered on trials days, is easily accessible,” she wrote minutes after his post.

READ MORE: ‘Assassination of Political Rivals as an Official Act’: AOC Warns Take Trump ‘Seriously’

Trump has tried to rile up his followers to come out and make a strong showing.

On Monday Trump urged his supporters to “rally behind MAGA” and “go out and peacefully protest” at courthouses across the country, while complaining that “people who truly LOVE our Country, and want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, are not allowed to ‘Peacefully Protest,’ and are rudely and systematically shut down and ushered off to far away ‘holding areas,’ essentially denying them their Constitutional Rights.”

On Wednesday Trump claimed, “The Courthouse area in Lower Manhattan is in a COMPLETE LOCKDOWN mode, not for reasons of safety, but because they don’t want any of the thousands of MAGA supporters to be present. If they did the same thing at Columbia, and other locations, there would be no problem with the protesters!”

After detailing several of his false claims about security measures prohibiting his followers from being able to show their support and protest, CNN published a fact-check on Wednesday:

“Trump’s claims are all false. The police have not turned away ‘thousands of people’ from the courthouse during his trial; only a handful of Trump supporters have shown up to demonstrate near the building,” CNN reported.

“And while there are various security measures in place in the area, including some street closures enforced by police officers and barricades, it’s not true that ‘for blocks you can’t get near this courthouse.’ In reality, the designated protest zone for the trial is at a park directly across the street from the courthouse – and, in addition, people are permitted to drive right up to the front of the courthouse and walk into the building, which remains open to the public. If people show up early enough in the morning, they can even get into the trial courtroom itself or the overflow room that shows near-live video of the proceedings.”

READ MORE: Justices’ Views on Trump Immunity Stun Experts: ‘Watching the Constitution Be Rewritten’

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.