• Source: Wikimedia
  • Breaking: Tennessee State Judge Rules In Same-Sex Couple's Divorce Case

    A Tennessee county judge has just refused to grant a divorce to a same-sex couple married in Iowa who moved to the The Volunteer State.

    Roane County Circuit Court Judge Russell E. Simmons Jr. has just handed down what may be the first loss for marriage equality supporters since the Supreme court's DOMA ruling in June, 2013.

    Judge Simmons rule that a legally-married same sex couple who married in Iowa cannot divorce in Tennessee, as the State of Tennessee does not recognize same-sex marriages.

    The ruling applies only to this one couple, and the judge recommend they appeal, the Knoxville News-Sentinel reports.

    Simmons in a seven-page opinion this week upheld Tennessee’s ban on same-sex marriage and ruled state laws now in effect don’t violate the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection and due process rights.

    “The battle is not between whether or not marriage is a fundamental right but what unions are included in the definition of marriage,” according to Simmons’ ruling.

    That decision, the judge opined, “should be the prerogative of each state. That neither the federal government nor another state should be allowed to dictate to Tennessee what has traditionally been a state’s responsibility, which is to provide a framework of laws to govern the safety and wellbeing of its citizens.”

    “The laws of Iowa concerning same sex marriage are so diametrically opposed to Tennessee’s laws, and Tennessee’s own legitimate public policy concerning same-sex marriage, that Tennessee is not required by the U.S. Constitution to give full faith and credit to a valid marriage of a same-sex couple in Iowa,” according to Simmons’ ruling.

    Frederick Michael Borman and Larry Kevin Pyles-Borman married in Iowa four years ago, before moving to Tennessee.

     

    Get weekly news & updates
    Subscribe
    Support our work DONATE



    Register to VOTE

    Showing 5 comments

    Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

    • commented 2016-07-08 21:59:58 -0400
      Hello every body my name is Synder Anderson I just want to share my experience with the world on how Lord Alika help me, I got my love back and saved my marriage… I was married for 3 years with 1 kid and we lived happily until things started getting ugly and we had fights and argued almost e very time… it got worse at a point that he filed for divorce I tried my best to make him change his mind & stay with me because I love him so much and don’t want to lose him but everything just didn’t work out… he moved out of the house because it was a rented apartment and still went ahead to file for divorce… I pleaded and tried everything but still nothing worked. The breakthrough came when someone introduced me to this wonderful, great spell caster who eventually helped me out… I have never been a fan of things like this but just decided to try reluctantly because I was desperate and left with no choice… He did special prayers and used his power… Within 4 days my husband called me and he said he was sorry for all the emotional pains he had cost me, moved back to the house and we continue to live happily and our kid is happy too and we are expecting our second child… and my Husband also got a new job and our lives became much better web:http://lordalikaspelltemp8.wix.com/http I have introduced him to a lot of couples with problems across the world and they have had good news..contact him on lordalikaspelltemple@yahoo.co.uk or +13217666393. web:http://lordalikaspelltemp8.wix.com/http

    • commented 2014-08-09 04:07:37 -0400
      But if you notice it says that the judge recommends that they appeal..I believe meaning that the judge is finding in line with Tennessee law, but realizes the implications of what is happening, and wants further guidance in this arena from his superiors

    • commented 2014-08-08 21:21:01 -0400
      A loss which further demonstrates the ‘wrongness’ of the entire discriminatory nature of these Unconstitutional Laws.

    • commented 2014-08-08 21:20:22 -0400
      “The battle is not between whether or not marriage is a fundamental right but what unions are included in the definition of marriage,” according to Simmons’ ruling.

      Marriage is a fundamental right. Therefore the definition of marriage also falls under the jurisdiction of a fundamental right.

    • commented 2014-08-08 18:58:12 -0400
      It’s unfortunately a loss. However, its status as the first opinion ruling on Tennessee’s ban on same-sex marriage and the first ruling by a state or district court upholding a ban on same-sex marriages may propel the need for a ruling by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.

      If that law is upheld by the Sixth Circuit, then it’s on to the Supreme Court, although, a ruling by the Fifth Circuit is more likely to be the one conflicting ruling by a higher court.

    Your rights, your movement.
    Join today:
    Your rights, your movement.
    Join today: