Watch: GOP Congressman Screws Up as Mueller Gives Him a Damning Answer Extremely Dangerous to Trump
A three-term Republican Congressman who is a former district attorney asked Robert Mueller a critical question and received an answer he clearly did not expect.
Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) asked the former Special Counsel if a president can be charged with a crime after he leaves office, and received an answer he did not expect.
“Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?” Congressman Buck asked Mueller.
“Yes,” the former special counsel and former FBI Director replied.
Surprised, Buck tried to clarify to get the answer he assumed he would get.
“You believe you could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?” he probed.
“Yes,” Director Mueller again replied.
Rep. Ken Buck: “Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?”
Robert Mueller: “Yes”
Buck: “You could charge the President of the United States with obstruction of justice after he left office?”
Mueller: “Yes” https://t.co/q26xNBe3pb #MuellerHearings pic.twitter.com/ky9Nnqv8Hz
— This Week (@ThisWeekABC) July 24, 2019
Many on social media cheered.
Let me be the first to welcome Ken Buck to the resistance. https://t.co/Pb7JmMBdTN
— Matthew Bunch-of-holes (@BunchaHoles) July 24, 2019
Did Ken Buck just get Mueller to confirm that Trump can be charged with crimes for what he’s done after he leaves office?
A Republican did that?
— Kevin M. Kruse (@KevinMKruse) July 24, 2019
Ken Buck just violated the first thing you're taught in trial practice in law school: "On cross examination, don't ask a question you don't already know the answer to". And he asked the question twice! 😂 https://t.co/8XvkhH8m9e
— Howard Stevenson (@hlstevenson2) July 24, 2019
Is it me or did Rep Ken Buck just earn himself a @GOP primary challenge in #CO4 because he seemed to have scored for @TheDemocrats? #TweetTheMuellerReport #MuellerHearings pic.twitter.com/5mzixcZI6P
— politicaltinder (@politicaltindr) July 24, 2019
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
Mary Trump Serves Up Three Critical Questions About Her Uncle’s Attack on Voting by Mail
President Donald Trump attacked voting by mail in a White House briefing on Monday.
Trump was asked a question on the topic by a reporter for the far-right cable news network OANN.
Trump threatened an executive order against mail-in voting, but did not provide specifics.
The President says he has a right to issue an executive order on mail-in voting pic.twitter.com/SXvTveV8NA
— Acyn Torabi (@Acyn) August 3, 2020
Mary Trump, the president’s psychologist niece who wrote the bestselling book Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man, had three key questions:
Has any reasonable American ever
–doubted the validity of mail-in ballots?
–questioned the value of the postal service?
–questioned the legitimacy of an election before a single vote is cast?
Why are these being questioned now?#SaveTheUSPS #protectmailinvoting #Biden2020
— Mary L Trump (@MaryLTrump) August 3, 2020
Read a transcript of Trump’s briefing:
“Are you considering at any point an executive order concerning mail ballots?” Basically “yes, and”-ing the president on a premise that makes no sense.
— Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) August 4, 2020
- News2 days ago
Right-Wingers’ Latest Chick-fil-A Meltdown Proves They Have ‘Officially Jumped the Shark’: Morning Joe Panel
- News1 day ago
‘Indictment Anytime’: Experts Explain Significance of Trump’s Attorneys Meeting With DOJ – Warn Plea Deal Possible
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM2 days ago
Fox Host Says Democrats Don’t Believe in Heaven So They Play ‘Hard’ to ‘Perfect’ Earth
- BREAKING NEWS1 day ago
Trump’s Attorneys Just Walked Into DOJ – Special Counsel Expected to Reach Charging Decision Soon: Report
- 'GROTESQUE SCAREMONGERING'1 day ago
‘Untrue and Hateful’: Nikki Haley Slammed for ‘Damnable Lie’ of Blaming Teen Girls Contemplating Suicide on Trans Kids
- News10 hours ago
‘Isn’t There a Beach in Mexico Waiting for You?’: Cruz Mocked for Claiming Garland Will Indict Trump Over SCOTUS Seat Loss
- News13 hours ago
‘This Is It, Make No Mistake’: ‘Nihilistic Moron’ Trump Heading for Another Indictment Says George Conway
- News1 day ago
Comer Struggles to Defend Need for Internal FBI Document on Biden as He Seeks Contempt of Congress for Director Wray