BAD PRESIDENT
President Quotes TV Lawyer Defending His Right to Fire: What Trump Was Thinking ‘Is an Outrageous’
President Trump launched a bizarre tweet Wednesday morning quoting one of the attorneys who frequently appear on Fox News, to defend his right to fire anyone.
“The questions are an intrusion into the President’s Article 2 powers under the Constitution to fire any Executive Branch Employee…what the President was thinking is an outrageous…..as to the President’s unfettered power to fire anyone…” Joe Digenova, former US Attorney
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 2, 2018
Presumably “the questions” refer to those The New York Times published this week that are believed to have been written by Jay Sekulow, the president’s attorney, after a meeting with Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
Trump’s misquoting of DeGenova appears to be from remarks he made on Tuesday:
“The questions are an intrusion into the president’s Article II powers under the Constitution, to fire any executive branch employee. To ask questions, as Mr. Mueller apparently proposes to do, about what the president was thinking when he fired Comey, or Flynn, or anybody else, is an outrageous, sophomoric, juvenile intrusion into the president’s unfettered power to fire anyone in the executive branch. It is a symptom of how ridiculous this appointment was by Rod Rosenstein when he made the appointment with no evidence of a crime.”
DiGenova is the attorney Sekulow announced he had hired before Trump met him and his wife, who work together and frequently appear together on Fox News. Trump rejected them after meeting them.
DiGenova is incorrect. Intent is a key criteria in deciding if acts like obstruction of justice are criminal.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.