Twitter’s Having a Great Time Reading the Editor’s Notes on Milo’s Cancelled Book, Like ‘Not the Time for Another Black-Dick Joke’
‘You’re Going to Have to Employ a Lot More Intellectual Rigor Than You Use Here’
Right wing provocateur, anti-gay gay person, “fellow traveller” with the alt-right, Twitter troll until he was banned, and former Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos is suing his publisher, Simon & Schuster, after they cancelled his book deal. One enterprising woman, a software engineer, found the court documents and, realizing the entire manuscript, including the editor’s notes are part of the official record, read through them and posted some of the “best” ones to Twitter.
I didn’t read the manuscript. Just the comments. They’re…amazing. Even better than the excerpts in the filing.
And a pretty good summary of the book I imagine. pic.twitter.com/2kPESxAlA9
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
When Yiannopoulos’ book, “Dangerous,” was cancelled, the prevailing assumption was because of the vile and offensive comments he made in 2015, that resurfaced, in which he defends the statutory rape of teen boys, possibly as young as 13 or 14.
But Simon & Schuster, according to the court documents, sent Yiannopoulos’ agent a letter on February 22 stating that his manuscript was “unacceptable for publication.”
And the humor – pic.twitter.com/x24gHa7phN
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
Sarah Mei, the founder of a community for software engineers like herself, posted these editor’s notes to Twitter. They are astonishing and astounding. Among them, “This is not the time or place for another Black-dick joke,” and, “This is definitely not the pace [sic] for more of your narcissism.”
And about that ego – pic.twitter.com/eIPyHWPwHj
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
And, this:
“This entire section is the most poorly-thought out section of the book. If you want to make the case for gay men going back in the closet and marrying women just to have children, you’re going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here.”
Will immediately start using “if you want to make a case for [fucking ridiculous thing], you’re going to have to employ a lot more intellectual rigor than you use here.†🔥🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/WV8xwt8cwj
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
Apparently, Milo thinks ugly people hate him.Â
Also I now know I can write a book, because ffs he wrote A WHOLE CHAPTER about how ugly people hate him
Literally anyone could do better than this pic.twitter.com/xdPhoioUT9
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
“This entire paragraph is just repeating Fake News.”
More from the category of “things a professional editor never imagined they’d need to tell someone†pic.twitter.com/EIOh8cPqss
— Sarah Mei (@sarahmei) December 28, 2017
Mei posted many more excerpts, you can see them on her Twitter page.Â
Many people on Twitter are having a great time reading them – a few examples:
Thanks for posting the links to the Milo lawsuit because I got to see his editor’s notes in a section about me 😂 pic.twitter.com/nxaTwqP8Kl
— Jessica Valenti (@JessicaValenti) December 28, 2017
but also take a moment to consider how milo’s editor was essentially trying to make white supremacy, misogyny, and homophobia publishable: pic.twitter.com/FD6sUgN84c
— E. Alex Jung (@e_alexjung) December 28, 2017
I really feel like this one both sums up the whole episode and should be put on t-shirts immediately: pic.twitter.com/QgM3ihUCV0
— SubZeroJeff (@jeffreyThomson) December 28, 2017
Like, let’s get the 40,000 foot view here for a second.
– GamerGate happened.
– Milo stoked a lot of it.
– Bannon deliberately leveraged Milo to grow the alt-right.
– It helped get Trump elected.
– Milo turns out to be a talentless fraud just like Bannon.— Emily G, Cville. (@EmilyGorcenski) December 28, 2017
this thread is amazing and another chance for me to marvel at how anyone thought that milo was anything other than an attention-seeking dumb dumb https://t.co/0Q9DRUtoU9
— Jamelle Bouie (@jbouie) December 28, 2017
Milo’s epitaph, pretty much. https://t.co/dn4xBWPRbh pic.twitter.com/7PdDogMxeX
— ana marie cox (@anamariecox) December 28, 2017
The Milo book editor comments should become everyone’s go to response to online abuse pic.twitter.com/FYuqcSTyxV
— Lynsey Barber… probably hasn’t seen your email (@lynseybarber) December 28, 2017
From now on, when someone tries to pick a fight with me on Twitter, I shall reply with a comment from Milo’s book editor pic.twitter.com/wiuTdDImGD
— Marie Connor (@thistallawkgirl) December 28, 2017
this comment on milo’s manuscript has me dead pic.twitter.com/VtSHLDK3hU
— ryan ✨ (@ryxnf) December 28, 2017
The reality is, Milo was and is a talentless, bigoted piece of shit who should’ve never gotten the book deal in the first place, so while the editorial comments are a special kind of delicious, I don’t know precisely what anybody expected.
— Chuck Wendig (@ChuckWendig) December 28, 2017
Oh my god you *have* to read this thread about Milo’s failed book deal with S&S.
I’m in tears over how untalented and worthless he is. https://t.co/AGzlLrwdYU
— Emily G, Cville. (@EmilyGorcenski) December 28, 2017
Oh, and rightly, Mei is being lauded as a hero:
This hero, this goddess amongst us, found Milo’s entire shitty manuscript along with his irritated publisher’s increasingly exasperated comments: https://t.co/Pe4Noj7fuJ
— Laurie Voss (@seldo) December 28, 2017
For those unfamiliar with Milo, here’s a video he posted this week:
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
If you find NCRM valuable, would you please consider making a donation to support our independent journalism?
Â
Â
Â
Â
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.