Almost every Republican Senator who has spoken out â€“Â except one â€“Â is in some way, shape, or form finding a way to defend “Judge” Roy Moore from allegations of child sexual abuse. Thursday the Washington Post published an extensive report detailing on-the-record allegations by four women againstÂ the Alabama Republican senatorial nominee, and backed up by interviews with more than 30 people who knew Moore during the time period in which the alleged misconduct took place.
In short, one woman says when she was 14 Moore, 32 years old at the time, took her to his home, stripped to his underwear, touched her bra and underwear, and placed her hand on his underwear over his groin.
Three other women allege when they were 16 or 18 Moore, again, in his 30’s, attempted behaviors including kissing. None allege sexual intercourse.
No Republican U.S. SenatorÂ or Representative, except for Sen. John McCain, has wholly denounced Moore and said he must step down.
The allegations against Roy Moore are deeply disturbing and disqualifying. He should immediately step aside and allow the people of Alabama to elect a candidate they can be proud of.
â€” John McCain (@SenJohnMcCain) November 9, 2017
Former McCain campaign senior strategist Steve Schmidt also denounced Moore:
Roy Moore is a sick man. He is a pedophile. This story is deeply sourced. It is credible and I believe the women.
â€” Steve Schmidt (@SteveSchmidtSES) November 9, 2017
Every other Republican lawmaker who has responded has found a way to defend Moore.
Most, merely by questioning the allegations â€“ and therefore, the women themselves.
“If true” is rape culture
â€” Talia Lavin (@chick_in_kiev) November 9, 2017
Every Republican Senator who has responded to the allegations against Roy Moore has found a way to use the “if true” method to defend him.
The question every senator needs to answer about Roy Moore is:
“Do you believe her?”
It’s taken until this cultural moment in 2017 for the answer to that question to be, “yes.”
â€” Kasie Hunt (@kasie) November 9, 2017
All these GOP senators say theyâ€™ll disavow Moore â€œifâ€ the allegations are true. What is the level of proof they require? Only if Moore fesses up? Women are on the record.
â€” Amanda Terkel (@aterkel) November 9, 2017
The Washington Post story has four women, all of whom are Republicans, some even voted for Trump, who has endorsed Moore. It also has 30 sources. There is no need for “if true” at this point.
“Whoa if true” is not an acceptable answer to four women alleging pedophilia on the record
â€” Lucia Graves (@lucia_graves) November 9, 2017
It’s not a court of law. No one’s being asked to send him to jail (yet), just to believeÂ four women who accused him of what most others would call inappropriate behavior, and one, child sexual abuse.Â
Who is going to decide if the on-the-record allegations are true, and when? Will Moore have to be tried and convicted before the allegations are “true”? It’s a convenient challenge these GOP lawmakers have created.
“The AtlanticÂ reached out to all 52 Republican senators to ask whether they think Moore should withdraw from the Alabama Senate race, based on the allegations,” The Atlantic’s David A. Graham and Elaine GodfreyÂ report. “Eighteen senators responded, all suggesting that if theÂ Washington PostÂ allegations are true, Moore should withdraw from the race.”
Take a look at these responses, all protecting Moore, all nearly word-for-word the same:
The allegations against Roy Moore are very serious and if true, he should step down as a candidate for the Senate.
â€” Senator John Hoeven (@SenJohnHoeven) November 9, 2017
The allegations in the Washington Post story are deeply disturbing, and if proven true, Judge Moore should immediately step aside
â€” Mark Meadows (@RepMarkMeadows) November 9, 2017
Sen. Mike Lee, one of very few Rs who endorsed Moore after the primary win: â€œIf these allegations are true, Judge Moore should resign.â€
â€” Dave Weigel (@daveweigel) November 9, 2017
Here’s the second-ranked Republican in the Senate:
Cornyn says of on-the-record testimony that Moore initiated sexual contact with a 14-yr-old girl: “Iâ€™m interested in seeing what substantiation there is for the story.â€ https://t.co/VYpx8eFbvS
â€” Alice Ollstein (@AliceOllstein) November 9, 2017
WH legislative director Marc Short on Roy Moore: “They’re very serious allegations, and if true, then yes, there’s no path forward…but I don’t think we should begin going down that pathway until we give Roy Moore the chance to defend himself.” (@CNNSitRoom)
â€” David Wright (@DavidWright_CNN) November 9, 2017
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
If you find NCRM valuable, would you please consider making a donation to support our independent journalism?
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
‘This Is Insane’: Experts Blast McCarthy After He Approves George Santos Attending Classified Briefing on China
U.S. Rep. George Santos (R-NY), under multiple state and federal investigations, and even a criminal fraud investigation in Brazil, recently stepped down from his committee assignments pending House ethics investigations, but on Thursday he will be allowed to attend a classified briefing by the Pentagon on threats from China.
Santos is facing numerous investigations, including ongoing, pending, or possible investigations from the U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Nassau District Attorney, the Queens District Attorney, the New York State Attorney General, along with the House Ethics Committee.
CNN’s Manu Raju Wednesday afternoon reports: “Asked Speaker McCarthy if he’s OK with George Santos attending tomorrow’s classified briefing on China. ‘Yes,’ he told me.”
Experts are expressing outrage, and are calling allowing Santos to gain access to classified information a “threat to our national security.”
“George Santos should not be getting access to classified information,” the government watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) immediately responded.
Last month CREW published a report that states: “George Santos should not get intelligence information.”
“Santos’s misrepresentations of large swaths of his background have proven his tendency to lie for power and personal gain. It is clear that he has not demonstrated the trustworthiness necessary to guard our country’s most closely guarded secrets,” it reads.
“Santos’s serial misrepresentations of the truth about a vast array of subjects have demonstrated an astonishing level of untrustworthiness,” CREW President Noah Bookbinder says in the report. “It would be a threat to our national security to allow him to serve on any committee where he would gain access to national intelligence.”
Retired U.S. Naval War College professor Tom Nichols, an academic specialist on international affairs including Russia, nuclear weapons, and national security affairs, tweeted: “This is insane.”
Just last month Speaker McCarthy banned two top House Democrats, Eric Swalwell and Adam Schiff, from returning to the Intelligence Committee. While he claimed it was for national security reasons, some believe it was retribution for their roles in prosecuting Donald Trump’s impeachments.
“I cannot put partisan loyalty ahead of national security, and I cannot simply recognize years of service as the sole criteria for membership on this essential committee. Integrity matters more,” McCarthy wrote in a letter.
Marjorie Taylor Greene During House Hearing: It’s ‘Against the Law’ to Ban My Twitter Account
Members of Congress have access to vast resources to conduct the people’s business, including on-staff attorneys and the ability to contract experts, yet on Wednesday U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) appeared to shun those assets while appearing before the TV cameras while misrepresenting federal law. She falsely declared that Twitter banning her personal account was “against the law,” and a violation of her First Amendment rights as she made clear she will use her newly-restored committee assignments to spread falsehoods, misinformation, and disinformation.
Greene now sits on the House Oversight and Accountability Committee. During its third hearing of the year, “Protecting Speech from Government Interference and Social Media Bias: Twitter’s Role in Suppressing the Biden Laptop Story,” Greene appeared determined to extract vengeance for her personal Twitter account being permanently “suspended” – banned –before Elon Musk purchased the company and restored accounts of countless extremists.
At the beginning of her remarks Greene mentioned the witnesses, including former Twitter executives, and said: “You can consider your speech canceled during my time because you permanently canceled mine.”
“You see, you permanently banned my personal Twitter account, and it was my campaign account also, so let’s talk about election interference, shall we?”
“Let’s explain 52 United States law 10101: ‘No person shall intimidate, threaten or coerce or attempt to stop any other person for the purpose of interfering with their rights to vote or to vote as you may choose,'” Greene said, reading inaccurately from 52 U.S.C. 10101.
For reasons unknown, Congresswoman Greene decided that federal voting rights law applies to Twitter. It does not.
“You didn’t shadow ban or permanently ban my Democrat opponent,” Greene charged. “No, you did that to me. And that was wrong and it was against the law.”
It is not against the law for Twitter to shadow ban or permanently ban anyone, even a Member of Congress and their personal Twitter account.
“You see, not only that, was it was it me, that you violated my First Amendment rights, you violated countless conservative Americans,” she said, which again is false. The First Amendment reads: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Greene pushed forward.
“These were doctors that were trying to tell the truth about COVID,” she said, of people spreading false or misleading information and disinformation. “Doctors that were having success treating people with ivermectin that you all would not allow to be talked about.”
The FDA has made clear ivermectin is not a treatment for COVID-19: “The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. Ivermectin is approved for human use to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms and head lice and skin conditions like rosacea.”
“These were parents complaining about their school boards, teaching gender lies in their schools, biological males entering their daughter’s bathrooms and sports,” she complained. “These were also people questioning the 2020 election. And guess what? That’s Americans’ First Amendment right. These were people talking about voting machines. You know what? Democrats did that in 2019 before the 2020 election,” she claimed.
Watch below or at this link.
Marjorie Taylor Greene thinks (wrongly) that Twitter broke the law by suspending her account for violating the terms of service pic.twitter.com/xKugHRHZ1F
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 8, 2023
‘Let’s Be Blunt’: Bannon Blasts Huckabee Sanders as ‘Not Intellectually Capable’ After ‘Insulting’ SOTU Response
Arkansas Republican Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders delivered the Republican Party’s official response to President Joe Biden’s State of the Union Address and was panned from all sides.
Many on the left were angered and outraged as she attacked LGBTQ and Black Americans in a lengthy speech that was tall on culture war rhetoric and extremism and short on policy or vision.
But even those on the right seems exasperated with her remarks.
Lou Dobbs, the far-right-wing culture warrior and former Fox Business anchor, told former Trump White House chief strategist Steve Bannon that Huckabee Sanders’ speech was “unacceptable,” and, “an insult to President Trump” for “not mentioning his name,” as Media Matters reports.
“Sarah Huckabee went to Iraq with the President,” Dobbs recalled, which the former White House press secretary spent an unusually large portion of her remarks discussing, “and the First Lady in the dark of night, for Christmas, with our troops.”
“To not mention is name, to talk about ‘new leadership’ – it looked like the Governor’s Association had written much of that speech, and aligned themselves with Ron DeSantis,” Dobbs lamented, calling it a “lack of respect to POTUS.”
Bannon, convicted on two federal criminal contempt charges, agreed that her remarks were “an insult to Trump.”
“She does not exist, politically, if it’s not for President Trump,” Bannon continued. “I thought the speech was terrible.”
“If you’re going to give a counter speech, you’ve got to talk about important issues. Don’t get me wrong, the wokeism is very important. But it’s not quite the heart of the matter right now, right? It’s not the heart of the matter. She is not — the reason is she’s just not — she’s not intellectually capable of going to the heart of the matter, right? Let’s be blunt.”
“This was like written by Ron DeSantis and the entire RGA,” Bannon said, referring to the Republican Governors’ Association.
Watch below or at this link.
- News2 days ago
‘National Security Nightmare’: Experts Concerned Melania Trump Was in Situation Room During ‘Major Military Operation’
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM3 days ago
‘Whatever Side Bet on Stupid Won Big’: Steve Schmidt Scorches Marco Rubio for ‘Kernels of Imbecility’ on Balloongate
- News3 days ago
Morning Joe Reminds Viewers of the Last Time the Koch Network ‘Stopped the Craziness’ in GOP Primaries
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM2 days ago
Jordan’s First Hearing on ‘So-Called’ Weaponization of Government Mocked Over Conspiracy Theorist Witnesses
- 'FEIGNING OUTRAGE'13 hours ago
Yes, the GOP Has Repeatedly Said It Wants to Gut Social Security and Medicare Before Calling Biden a ‘Liar’ – Here’s Proof
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM1 day ago
Former GOP Congressman Calls for Marjorie Taylor Greene to Be Censured After Calling President Biden a ‘Liar’
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM1 day ago
‘Salute Their Flags’: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Appears to Attack LGBTQ Americans and BLM During Angry GOP SOTU Response
- COMMENTARY2 days ago
Right-Wing Outraged Over Falsely Thinking White House Press Secretary Said National Security Council Is Using ‘TikTok’