‘What Would Your Family Do With a Pet Unicorn?’
PresidentÂ Donald Trump and Republicans are desperate to pass a “tax reform” bill by the end of the year. Chances they will be successful are slim, since this administration literally has had exactly zero major legislative wins since taking office in January. Chances are also slim since no bill has been written yet, and since Trump’s spokespeople, Republican lawmakers, and GOP surrogates are all falsely claiming the nonexistent tax reform bill will give families across America a $4000 annual raise.
Claiming “The average American family would get a $4,000 raise under the Presidentâ€™s tax cut plan,”Â Sarah Huckabee Sanders has been asking, “What would your family do w/ a $4,000 raise from the Presidentâ€™s tax cut plan?”Â
Here’s how one person explained the fast one she’s trying to pull:
If I give 10 apples to one person and no apples to nine people, the average person has one apple.
Why are nine people mad at me? https://t.co/ezQWsReU6i
â€” Franklin Leonard (@franklinleonard) October 23, 2017
Huckabee Sanders has been posting these tweets â€“ which are all based on that false premise:
What would your family do w/ a $4,000 raise from the Presidentâ€™s tax cut plan? REPLY & Iâ€™ll share your familyâ€™s story in the press briefing
â€” Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) October 23, 2017
New report: lowering the corporate tax rate from 35% to 20% = average pay raise of $4,000 annually per householdhttps://t.co/UtDdZ0iSUZ
â€” Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) October 23, 2017
Here’s what former Obama White House Deputy Assistant to the President for economic policy and Deputy Director of theÂ National Economic CouncilÂ Jacob Leibenluft, who alsoÂ led SecretaryÂ HillaryÂ Clintonâ€™s economic policy team had to say on the press secretary’s claims:
WH can’t sell a middle-class tax cut b/c there isn’t one– they’re resting entire argument on trickle-down effect of corporate tax cuts /fin
â€” Jacob Leibenluft (@jleibenluft) October 23, 2017
Michael Linden, an economic policy “wonk” andÂ Fellow at the RooseveltÂ Institute:
Middle-class workers get next to nothing in the Trump tax plan. There is no magic “$4,000” wage increase. The claim is utterly silly.
â€” Michael Linden (@MichaelSLinden) October 23, 2017
In other words, the claim is false, and like everything else out of the Trump administration, a sham.
Folks on Twitter have decided to mock Sarah Huckabee Sanders for asking, “What would your family do w/ a $4,000 raise from the Presidentâ€™s tax cut plan?” and related claims:
4000 Magic Beans traded for Billionaire Tax Breaks? I don’t think so! Ms Sanders a baiting you with the Dear Leader Circumvolution Stupor! ðŸ˜‚ pic.twitter.com/SMZInVhKqC
â€” Wmxdesign (@Wmxdesign) October 23, 2017
â€” doug (@DougP1) October 23, 2017
â€” Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) October 23, 2017
Circa 1789 France: “What would your family do w/ a bread loaf from King Louis?”
â€” Moab the Dog (@moab_the_dog) October 23, 2017
â€” Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) October 23, 2017
Build a bomb shelter. https://t.co/NUzvFnGf76
â€” David Corn (@DavidCornDC) October 23, 2017
I would donate it to the ACLU so no Jane Does have to suffer the degradation and agony of forced childbirth.
â€” Sarah Clarke (@sarahannclarke) October 23, 2017
Donate it to the #ImpeachTrump campaign. I look forward to you sharing my story!!
â€” Pattilynn (@Patti_lynnAZ) October 23, 2017
I would donate it to this https://t.co/RHcb9y41kw and wait for your apology from the President you represent for calling his wife a liar.
â€” Scary Eeee McSin (@MaryEMcGlynn) October 23, 2017
Ooh! I can’t wait to use it as a down payment on my family’s monthly insurance bill after you take down the ACA.
â€” Wendy Sang Kelly (@sang_kelly) October 23, 2017
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
If you find NCRM valuable, would you please consider making a donation to support our independent journalism?
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
Watch: Democrat Delivers Fiery Rebuke to House Republicans Trying to Deprive Veterans of Abortion Rights
U.S. Rep. Elissa Slotkin, Democrat of Michigan, blasted congressional Republicans on the floor of the House of Representatives Wednesday, accusing them of turning a basic, bipartisan bill to help the nation’s veterans into “a cold heartless, violent” referendum on the right to abortion.
“In terms of making decisions on behalf of women, if you want to take a veterans’ bill and make it about abortion, then let’s do it,” Slotkin dared her Republican colleagues. “What you are saying – and you’re saying in front of the American people – is that you believe a veteran who has been raped, who was the victim of incest, or who is having a dangerous miscarriage, does not deserve access to abortion.”
Slotkin was referring to the Solid Start Act, her legislation designed to help veterans transition into civilian society. Republicans tried to block the bill after learning it includes a “requirement that the Department of Veterans Affairs provide female veterans with information ‘tailored to their specific health care’ needs, which would adhere to a new VA policy providing abortion access for women vets who are victims of rape, incest or whose life is jeopardized,” HuffPost reports.
“If you can’t state it, then be clear you believe in no exceptions for women — a cold heartless, violent approach to women’s health,” said Slotkin, whose stepdaughter is a female Army officer. “You want to ban all abortions. That is your goal. Many of you have been open about that, and if you flip the House, we know that you will put forward a full ban on all abortion for all states.”
Slotkin, a military spouse and military step mother, is correct. House GOP Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s plan for Republicans to take back control of the House, his Newt Gingrich-endorsed “Commitment to America” says it very clearly. In the section called “Preserve Our Constitutional Freedoms,” he says Republicans will “protect the lives of unborn children and their mothers.”
But GOP opposition to the abortion provisions in the veterans’ bill is even more extreme than McCarthy’s message – and does not protect the life of the mother.
“We are all, on this floor, elected officials and not medical professionals,” Slotkin added in her more-then two-minute rebuke. “If it was your wife, your daughter who was suffering through a miscarriage, are you going to tell her she can’t until her fever gets high enough and until she’s bleeding harder?”
“If that’s what you want for veterans, shame on you! Shame on you!”
Watch below or at this link.
Slotkin: What you are saying and saying
in front of the American people is you believe a veteran who has been raped, who is a victim of incest or who is having a dangerous miscarriage does not deserve access to abortion.. Who do you think you are? pic.twitter.com/44kbO7EAJU
— Acyn (@Acyn) September 29, 2022
Ginni Thomas Testifies Today Before J6 Committee
Far-right-wing activist and lobbyist Ginni Thomas, who held a months-long pressure campaign with Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to try to force him to somehow overturn the 2020 election, and sent numerous emails to GOP lawmakers in multiple states also trying convince them to overturn the election, will testify today before the U.S. House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack.
Were Thomas merely a far-right wing extremist, or even a wealthy and powerful lobbyist, her actions would have received less scrutiny, but given she is married to a U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Clarence Thomas, who was the sole vote opposing the release of January 6 documents to the House Select Committee investigating the insurrection, many see her actions as concerning and deserving of investigation.
Politico’s Kyle Cheney broke the news Thomas will testify before the Committee today. Her testimony will be virtual. The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell adds, it is “voluntary.”
Calling Thomas “one of the panel’s most high-profile outstanding witnesses,” Politico reports, “Lawmakers took interest in her connections to John Eastman, a legal architect of former President Donald Trump’s last-ditch plan to subvert the 2020 election. She’d invited Eastman to speak to an activist group in the aftermath of the election, though Eastman has denied ever discussing Supreme Court-related matters with Thomas.”
In a March opinion piece on MSNBC, Wayne Batchis, associate professor of political science at the University of Delaware, examined the Supreme Court’s “Clarence Thomas (and Ginni Thomas) problem.”
“It turns out that Thomas not only sat on the board of an organization that promoted the dangerous fiction that the 2020 election was ‘stolen’ from former President Donald Trump through fraud, she also attended the rally attempting to vindicate this paranoid propagandistic fantasy (and said she left before Trump took the stage),” Batchis wrote.
” All the while, in what might resemble the coordinated efforts of synchronized swimmers, husband and wife seemingly sought to thwart the investigation into the democratically perilous events of Jan. 6. Ginni Thomas signed on to a letter seeking the expulsion of Republican Reps. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger from the Republican conference for joining the House Jan. 6 investigation committee; Clarence Thomas was the sole dissenter — standing in opposition to the rest of the court, including its three Trump appointees — in a decision allowing for the release of Jan. 6-related documents to said committee.”
“Without trust in the courts,” he warns, “American democracy does not stand a chance.”
Former GOP Congressman Has ‘Legitimate Concerns’ Clarence Thomas Was Involved in ‘Push to Overturn the Election’
Questions surfaced after Justice Clarence Thomas was the only member of the U.S. Supreme Court to oppose the release of Mark Meadows’ texts and information to the Jan. 6 committee. It turned out that in those text messages that the justice didn’t want revealed were communications with his wife.
Former Rep. Denver Riggleman (R-VA), wrote in his new book that he thinks Justice Thomas is far more involved in his wife Ginni Thomas’ 2020 election overthrow attempts.
Riggleman, who left the committee in April, included many of the text messages that had previously been released from Ginni Thomas, along with the note that he had a difficult time trying to get the House Select Committee to sound the alarm on her actions.
“Supreme Court spouses are typically low profile. Ginni’s involvement with political groups had already led to questions about whether Clarence would need to recuse himself in cases with a political component,” wrote Riggleman. If Clarence had been in the logs, it would be a much bigger deal than all that. When I began to suspect Ginni and Clarence had texted with Meadows, I put together a technical brief outlining how we might be able to cement the identifications.”
Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) called him to express concern that telling Americans that such an influential figure had gone full-Q. Cheney was worried it would turn the whole committee into a political sideshow and overshadow all of the other work the committee was doing. The release of Riggleman’s book has left the committee members furiousover possible leaks after spending a year with so few.
Riggleman persisted in pressing Cheney to tell Americans about the Thomases.
“The committee needed to show the American people that there was an organized, violent effort to reverse the election—and that there were indications it could have been directed by the White House,” he wrote. “Thanks to their prominence, Ginni and Clarence would make a lot of headlines, but those headlines might overwhelm the other important work we were doing.”
The conversation with Cheney didn’t go well, with the two “type A personalities” duking-out their arguments. Riggleman argued that data wasn’t political. It wasn’t right or wrong.
“I also thought that, given Clarence’s position and Ginni’s prominence in conservative circles, the American public had to know what she had been up to,” argued Riggleman. “Some of the messages went beyond simply cheering Meadows on. It was legitimate for me to have concerns as to whether a Supreme Court justice had been involved in the legally questionable push to overturn the election. Was it possible that one of the country’s nine top judges was on board with an authoritarian interpretation of the Constitution? The implications were overwhelming. Cheney found it all improbable. I think she still had more faith in the institutional GOP than I did at that point.”
Riggleman’s book, The Breach, is on sale now and Raw Story has complete coverage here.
- News2 days ago
Embattled Trump-Appointed DHS Inspector Was Given Phones of Secret Service Agents in July, Raising ‘New Questions’: Report
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM2 days ago
‘Bright-Red, Ear-Splitting Alarm Bell’: Former Top GOP Congressman Blasted for ‘Normalization’ of Fascism (Video)
- CRIME2 days ago
Trump Mocked for ‘Sidelining’ His New $3 Million Attorney: ‘Must Have Given Him Actual Legal Advice’
- News2 days ago
Watch: Cruz Only ‘No’ Vote After Railing Against Bipartisan Bill to Prevent Another Coup
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM1 day ago
Don’t Call Us ‘Fascists’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Blasts News Media After Criticism Over Her Feral Hog Hunting Stunt
- RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM3 days ago
‘We Need to Go All the Way’: GOP Lawmaker Brags Her ‘Don’t Say Gay’ Bill ‘Goes Further’ Than Florida’s But Not Far Enough
- News1 day ago
Trump Uses Crude Anti-LGBTQ Language – Aides Stunned by Obsession With Staffers’ Sexuality: New Book
- RIGHT WING EXTREMISM3 days ago
Fox News Host Claims ‘Whites Are a Minority in California’ So Dems Want ‘On-Ramp’ for Undocumented Immigrants to Vote