Watch: State Dept. Falsely Explains Vote Against UN Resolution Condemning Death Penalty for Same-Sex Relations
Wrongly Claims Resolution Calls for ‘Abolition’ of Death Penalty Altogether
Forced to explain its vote publicly, the U.S. Dept. of State is wrongly characterizing a United Nations resolution that condemns the use of the death penalty for same-sex relations and other acts. On Friday the Trump administration voted against a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution that urges countries to examine the death penalty, especially when used arbitrarily or in a discriminatory manner.
State Dept. spokesperson Heather Nauert, quoting a State Dept. representative to the UN’s Human Rights Council, told reporters Wednesday the U.S. voted against the resolution in part because it “called for the abolition of the death penalty altogether.”
That is incorrect – NCRM could find no place in the resolution calling for the abolition of the death penalty. Â
.@statedeptspox comments on a vote related to the death penalty at the @UN #HumanRights Council in Geneva. #UNHRC pic.twitter.com/nSugkMrBZC
— Department of State (@StateDept) October 3, 2017
Nauert was likely quoting Jason Mack, who delivered a statement dated Friday explaining the U.S. vote. That statement was not published on the State Dept. website until Wednesday.
“The United States unequivocally condemns the application of the death penalty for conduct such as homosexuality, blasphemy, adultery, and apostasy. We do not consider such conduct appropriate for criminalization,” Nauert, quoting Mack, told reporters.
Former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, denounced the U.S. vote Wednesday afternoon:
After this repugnant US “no†vote, even if @potus is incapable of shame, the rest of the Trump administration should be ashamed to have sided with countries that arrest people – and worse – for being #LGBT https://t.co/vfBQP0FXjb
— Samantha Power (@SamanthaJPower) October 3, 2017
The UN resolution does call on nations that have yet to abolish the death penalty to “consider” signing a covenant “aiming at the abolition of the death penalty.” But it does not outright call for the abolition of the death penalty.
The resolution calls on countries to “undertake further studies to identify the underlying factors that contribute to the substantial racial and ethnic bias in the application of the death penalty, where they exist, with a view to developing effective strategies aimed at eliminating such discriminatory practices,” for example.
The resolution also condemns the use of the death penalty “against persons with mental or intellectual disabilities and persons below 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the crime, as well as pregnant women.”Â
NCRM has reached out to the State Dept. but has yet to receive a response.
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
If you find NCRM valuable, would you please consider making a donation to support our independent journalism?
Â

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |