Trump Lies About James Comey – To Save His Own Skin
President Tries to Discredit Former FBI Chief Who Will Likely Be Key Part of Trump’s Downfall
President Donald Trump took to Twitter Friday morning, far later than usual, lying about the FBI Director he fired, in an obvious attempt to discredit him.Â
“Wow, looks like James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton long before the investigation was over…and so much more. A rigged system!” Trump tweeted.
Wow, looks like James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton long before the investigation was over…and so much more. A rigged system!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 1, 2017
That’s a lie.
First of all, as NCRM reported Thursday, Comey did not, nor did he have the power to exonerate Hillary Clinton.Â
What really happened is Trump, we know, called Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, one of Trump’s most-devoted partisans, on Wednesday. The conversation comes just days before Trump’s son, Donald Jr., is set to testify before Grassley’s committee.Â
Coincidence?
Why did Trump call?
Seriously.
Like Trump cares one iota about ethanol.
But you can bet Senator Grassley, Republican of Iowa, where the corn grows tall and gets made into ethanol, certainly does.
One day later, Sen. Grassley, along with his friend Senator Lindsey Graham, sent a letter to the FBI, attacking – you got it – Jim Comey. It claims Comey drafted a letter that became the basis of his now infamous press conference detailing why he was recommending Hillary Clinton not be charged with any crimes related to her handling of State Dept. emails and her use of a private server.
It’s a relatively unsubstantiated charge, and one that should not have been made public. But it helps Donald Trump.
Coincidence?
And now, after Grassley’s letter went viral on mostly right wing and political news websites, public opinion is turning against Comey. It’s embarrassing. And it’s absolutely wrong to use the Office of the President to attack a dedicated public servant, one who was fired by that president, and who may hold the key to information that will help Special Counsel Robert Mueller decide if Trump should be prosecuted for obstruction, or collusion, or anything else.
The smart people, at least, on social media are not buying the president’s amateur attacks.Â
Here’s the editor in chief of Lawfare, a well-respected and now very popular legal blog:
A few thoughts in response to the latest slime-job by the President against Comey. I will keep this very brief. /1/ https://t.co/hvdDHitYHd
— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) September 1, 2017
There is nothing surprising about this news that Comey began drafting what became the declination statement early. /3/
— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) September 1, 2017
Comey was committed to transparency; the hardest part was explaining that they did a credible investigation that resulted in no charges. /5/
— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) September 1, 2017
So I would not be at all surprised if he began exploring how much transparency was possible under the law and what it would look like. /6/
— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) September 1, 2017
Smart people think ahead and prepare. That appears to be an alien notion to our current President, but that’s likely what happened here. /8/
— Benjamin Wittes (@benjaminwittes) September 1, 2017
And more smart folks:Â
The election was 297 days ago and Trump is still tweeting about Hillary Clinton. https://t.co/p9CfirMaBj
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) September 1, 2017
Pro-Tip: Don’t complain about a “rigged system” while under criminal investigation for riggin’ an election. https://t.co/tLrN2yJVee
— Tea Pain (@TeaPainUSA) September 1, 2017
When firing Comey, Trump’s White House put out a lengthy letter saying it was essentially because Comey was too tough on Clinton. https://t.co/ZXAwQf8kum
— Josh Dawsey (@jdawsey1) September 1, 2017
It’s a bipartisan DOJ conceit. The decision is never “made” until the end, even when there’s a 99% chance it is only going to go one way. https://t.co/OAnq1H6WhH
— Matthew Miller (@matthewamiller) September 1, 2017
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.Â
Â

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |