Trump Asked Sessions About Dropping Arpaio Case, was ‘Gung-Ho’ About Pardon if Needed
Sessions Reportedly Advised Dropping Case ‘Inappropriate’Â
Donald Trump’s controversial decision to pardon neo-Nazi hero Joe Arpaio, convicted of criminal contempt of court for defying an order to stop racially profiling Latinos, has drawn bipartisan condemnation—but a new report says that the decision had been on the president’s mind even before the embattled sheriff’s trial.
The Washington Post reported Saturday evening that the president asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions “whether it would be possible for the government to drop the criminal case against Arpaio†this past spring, citing three individuals familiar with the conversation.
Sessions reportedly told Trump doing so would be “inappropriate.â€
The outlet further reported that “the president waited, all the while planning to issue a pardon if Arpaio was found in contempt of court for defying a federal judge’s order to stop detaining people merely because he suspected them of being undocumented immigrants.â€
In the words of one associate, the newspaper reported, Trump was “gung-ho about it.â€
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders responded to questions about the president’s conversation with the Attorney General, advising that “it’s only natural the president would have a discussion with administration lawyers about legal matters. This case would be no different.â€
The Department of Justice declined to comment. And as the outlet further pointed out:
Trump’s pardon, issued without consulting the Justice Department, raised a storm of protest over the weekend, including from some fellow Republicans, and threatens to become a stain on the president’s legacy. His effort to see if the case could be dropped showed a troubling disregard for the traditional wall between the White House and the Justice Department, and taken together with similar actions could undermine respect for the rule of law, experts said.
Some reactions, via Twitter:
So Trump also asked Sessions to drop the Arpaio case? Par for the course. Happier than ever that I did not return this man’s call in March. https://t.co/3RnSyMkISy
— Preet Bharara (@PreetBharara) August 26, 2017
Trump to Comey: Can you go easy on Flynn?
Trump to Sessions: Can you kill Arpaio case?
What’s next?
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) August 26, 2017
making comey even more credible on trump asking him to drop case against kelly. https://t.co/oz7CmkVk58
— chris smith (@chrissmithnymag) August 26, 2017
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
Â
Photo via Twitter

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |