Connect with us

President’s ‘Both Sides’ Comments on Charlottesville White Supremacist Violence Have Cost Trump Over $1 Million

Published

on

$1.1 Million – and Likely Much, Much More

President Trump’s remarks equating neo-Nazis and white supremacists with the people protesting them and their rally, his claim there was violence “on many sides” and later, placing blame on “both sides” is costing him. Bigly.

According to The Washington Post‘s David Farenthold, who tracks several of the ways Trump has been using his position as president to make money, 18 charities have canceled fundraising galas at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida since Trump’s offensive remarks. That number has doubled in just four days.

Here’s one of his tweets of his now-famous pads:

“In the past seven days — since President Trump said there were ‘fine people’ among those marching in a violence-plagued ‘Unite the Right’ demonstration in Charlottesville — the president’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Florida has been deserted by 18 charities that planned to use its ballrooms for fundraisers,” Farenthold, in an article written with Drew Harwell, reports.

“Those charities are key customers of Trump’s club: They can pay as much as $275,000 for a single night’s revelry. They also are an important marker of prestige in Palm Beach: When big galas are going on in Mar-a-Lago’s ballrooms, the island’s elite must come to Trump, gathering at a club that doubles as his home. Even as president, Trump has reveled in this role: He has dropped in to glad-hand and address the crowds.”

(MSNBC puts the number of cancellations at 19.)

According to the Post, the charities pay between $100,000 and $275,000, and reports that “lowball numbers yield an estimate of $1.1 million in revenue that Trump’s club could have expected” from 14 lost events.

It does seem the number could easily be much higher.

In recent years, Mar-a-Lago has run profits between $4 million and $8 million, according to documents the club filed in court in Florida,” Farenthold notes. Those numbers are profits, not total revenue, and include other revenue streams, like membership fees.

The Post lists some of the charities that have canceled, and notes some may or may not be getting their deposits returned:

American Red Cross, the Salvation Army, the American Cancer Society, American Friends of Magen David Adom, Leaders in Furthering Education, the Palm Beach Zoo, the Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach, the Susan G. Komen breast cancer charity,  the Autism Project of Palm Beach County, and Gateway for Cancer Research.

Additionally, the Post reports several non-profits have canceled luncheons, which can mean “$24,000 to more than $80,000″ each for Mar-a-Lago: Bethesda Hospital Foundation, Ryan Licht Sang Bipolar Foundation, MorseLife, Hearing the Ovarian Cancer Whisper, the Unicorn Children’s Foundation, and Big Dog Ranch Rescue.

Two non-profits are sticking with Trump: The Palm Beach Police Foundation and the Palm Beach County Republican Party.

RELATED STORIES:

Ninth Non-Profit This Week Cancels Mar-a-Lago Event Following Trump’s Charlottesville Response

More Non-Profits Cancel Mar-a-Lago Fundraising Galas Over Charlottesville Response, Costing Trump Bigly

Trump’s Response to Charlottesville Costs Him Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars as Charities Cancel Mar-a-Lago Galas

To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.

Image via Wikimedia

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

YOU CAN'T DO THAT

Trump Considered Selling Puerto Rico: Ex-DHS Chief

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s former acting Secretary of Homeland Security says the leader of the free world considered selling Puerto Rico.

Elaine Duke, who describes herself as a lifelong Republican, spoke with The New York Times in a “wide-ranging interview” about her 14 months working for Trump.

“Among her most searing moments during the response to the hurricanes came when she heard Mr. Trump raise the possibility of ‘divesting’ or ‘selling’ Puerto Rico as the island struggled to recover,” the newspaper reported.

“Can we outsource the electricity? Can we can we sell the island? You know, or divest of that asset?” Trump reportedly asked.

Puerto Rico is an American territory, the island’s three million people are American citizens. The territory’s government estimates that 2,975 Americans were killed by the hurricane.

Duke also said she was not ready to support Trump’s re-election.

“That’s a really hard question,” she said. “But given the choices, I don’t know yet.”

Read the full report.

Continue Reading

ANTI-AMERICAN

10 Hate Groups Got Millions in COVID-19 Government Loans Intended for Small Businesses

Published

on

Hate groups millions PPP

Several groups listed as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) got millions in government-backed Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, money intended for businesses with 10 or fewer employees that have been harmed by the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic.

The groups include the anti-Muslim organization The Center for Security Policy; the two anti-immigrant groups, the Center for Immigration Studies and the Federation for American Immigration Reform; and three rabidly anti-LGBTQ groups, the American Family Association (AFA), Liberty Counsel and the Pacific Justice Institute (PJI).

According to the SPLC, all three groups regularly fight against LGBTQ civil rights. The PJI has said gay marriage would lead to legalized polygamy and incest, LGBT History Month in schools promotes gay pornography, and compared gay marriage to Nazism.

Spokespeople for the Liberty Counsel have called homosexuality immoral, unnatural, and self-destructive; called same-sex marriage “destructive to individuals and … our very social fabric,” has said gay marriage would lead to a “rampant increase in diseases,” and have called LGBTQ rights a “direct assault on our religious freedom and freedom of speech.” The group is currently suing a Connecticut school board in order to ban transgender students from participating in high school sports.

The  Liberty Counsel received somewhere between $350,000 and $1 million from the PPP program, and the Pacific Justice Institute received between $150,000 and $350,000.

The AFA has called transgender people sexual predators and child molesters, declared homosexuality as hazardous to one’s health, said Islam is a religion of intolerance and war, and claimed that gay men were responsible for “Adolph Hitler… the Brown Shirts, the Nazi war machine and six million dead Jews.”

“Many of these groups that traffic in hate are already well-resourced, with a constant injection of funding from far-right mega-donors and dark money foundations,” Imraan Siddiqi, executive director of the Arizona branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said to the Center for Media and Democracy.

“This just highlights more cases of vital funding getting into the hands of those who didn’t need it, while many small businesses in our communities came up empty and are having to fold,” Siddiqi added.

Continue Reading

ABOUT TIME

Facebook & Instagram Ban All Content Promoting So-Called “Ex-Gay” Conversion Therapy

Published

on

ex gay conversion therapy, Facebook and Instagram

On Friday, Facebook and Instagram announced a ban on all videos, images, and written content promoting so-called “ex-gay” conversion therapy or reparative therapy, a widely disavowed and debunked form of psychological torture that purports to change someone’s sexual orientation or gender identity.

The social media giant which owns both platforms said that the ban was merely an expansion of its policies banning hate speech and a progression of its pre-existing ban on conversion therapy ads.

“We don’t allow attacks against people based on sexual orientation or gender identity and are updating our policies to ban the promotion of conversion therapy services,” said Tara Hopkins, Instagram’s public policy director for Africa, Europe and the Middle East, although the ban will apply to the U.S., South America and Australia as well.

Although Twitter and Vimeo both have bans on similar content, it’s unclear whether YouTube does as well. The Google-owned video-sharing platform came under fire in June 2018 for running conversion therapy ads before videos made by LGBTQ content creators. At the time, the platform said it didn’t allow ads that promote hatred or illegal services, but that could feasibly allow such ads to continue running in the 30 states where the practice remains legal.

Religious conservatives have previously fought bans on the practice as violations of their constitutionally protected rights to “free speech” and “religious freedom.” Proponents say that people should have the right to rid themselves of “same-sex attraction” and “gender confusion.”

However, the actual methods of ex-gay therapy have never been proven to actually change anyone’s sexual orientation or gender identity. Such programs often tell clients to avoid masturbation, to exercise to exhaustion, to view queerness as physically disgusting or threatening to one’s health, or to “reframe” one’s desire onto opposite-sex partners. Other practitioners have used electroshock therapy, molestation, sexual assault, forced medication, or strict gender-typed dress and grooming codes to try and change people.

A 2013 survey said 84 percent of former ex-gay therapy clients still feel lasting shame and emotional harm from undergoing such “therapies.” Numerous conversion therapy advocates later come out as still gay, admitting that it doesn’t work and apologizing for ruining lives while lying to people about its effectiveness.

Most Americans oppose conversion therapy and almost every major American psychological, health and pediatric association does as well. In the past, the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear cases challenging the constitutionality of conversion therapy bans as violations against religious freedom, but it remains unclear whether the court will continue to refuse such cases now that it has a more conservative majority.

While the bans are helpful, some states still allow the harmful practice to be marketed towards adults or to everyone under the guise of “religious counseling.” Even states that ban the practice still allow abusive “teen discipline” work camps where parents send their queer and “troubled” youth to be “straightened out.”

Featured image by Daniel Tobias. (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.