Trump Attorney Just Apparently Accused Comey of Violating Executive Privilege Trump Said He Would Not Invoke
Accuses Comey of Perjury, and Seems to Suggest Comey Should Be Investigated for Illegal Leaking
President Donald Trump, through his personal attorney, Thursday afternoon apparently accused former FBI Director Jim Comey of violating executive privilege, after the president’s press secretary publicly stated that the White House would not be invoking executive privilege.
He also accused Comey of perjury:
This sentence in DJT-lawyer statement deserves careful attention
Comey testified under oath. Thus Trump is accusing him of perjury, a felony pic.twitter.com/s2CVpGw0n8— James Fallows (@JamesFallows) June 8, 2017
“Today, Mr. Corney admitted that he unilaterally and surreptitiously made unauthorized disclosures to the press of privileged communications with the President,” Marc Kasowitz, Trump’s personal attorney, told reporters while delivering a statement at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
Calling Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee “leaks of … privileged information,” Kasowitz said the former FBI Director “admitted that he leaked to friends his purported memos of these privileged conversations, one of which he testified was classified.”
James Comey made “unauthorized disclosures to the press of privileged communication with the president,” Trump attorney Marc Kasowitz says. pic.twitter.com/9sgm4O6Xbh
— CBS News (@CBSNews) June 8, 2017
There’s no proof Comey disclosed classified information to anyone not authorized.
“He also testified that immediately after he was terminated he authorized his friends to leak the contents of these memos to the press in order to ‘prompt the appointment of a special counsel.’ Although Mr. Comey testified he only leaked the memos in response to a tweet, the public record reveals that the New York Times was quoting from these memos the day before the referenced tweet, which belies Mr. Comey’s excuse for this unauthorized disclosure of privileged information and appears to entirely retaliatory.”
Again, no proof offered, and according to this Weekly Standard reporter, Kasowitz is wrong:
Kasowitz’s claim that the Times quoted the memo before Trump’s tweet is not true.
— Mike Warren (@MichaelRWarren) June 8, 2017
He also seemed to imply Comey is an illegal leaker, stating that “from before this President took office to this day, it is overwhelmingly clear that there have been and continue to be those in government who are actively attempting to undermine this administration with selective and illegal leaks of classified information and privileged communications. Mr. Comey has now admitted that he is one of these leakers.
[Bolding ours]
“We will leave it the appropriate authorities to determine whether this leaks should be investigated along with all those others being investigated,” Kasowitz said.
He also denied Comey’s claim that President Trump asked Comey for loyalty and told reporters “Mr Comey’s testimony also makes clear that the President never sought to impede the investigation into attempted Russian interference in the 2016 election.”
UPDATE: 3:16 PM EDT –
We’re literally at the point where the president’s lawyer utters a clear falsehood and everyone just shrugs https://t.co/nVuM1CDgV2
— Eric Geller (@ericgeller) June 8, 2017
Marc Kasowitz: Comey said Trump’s tweet prompted the Times story, but that’s a lie—the Times came first.
Reality: It was four days later.— Ben Greenman (@bengreenman) June 8, 2017
Comey memo was his to leak. Again, not classified and there is zero chance of prosecuting him for it. Red herring. https://t.co/zfsY3W4QMh
— Michael Weiss (@michaeldweiss) June 8, 2017
FYI to law students: whatever you just saw Trump’s lawyer say, a lawyer cannot generally assert “privilege.” Needs to be specific.
— Max Kennerly (@MaxKennerly) June 8, 2017
RELATED STORIES:
WATCH: Comey Says Trump’s Claims His Leadership of the FBI Was Poor ‘Were Lies, Plain and Simple’
Twitter Having a Great Time Mocking White House Claim That ‘The President Is Not a Liar’
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.
This is a breaking news and developing story. Details may change. This story will be updated, and NCRM will likely publish follow-up stories on this news. Stay tuned and refresh for updates.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.