WATCH: Comey’s Written Testimony ‘Establishes Obstruction of Justice by Trump’ Says CNN Legal Analyst
‘Comey’s Statement Establishes Obstruction of Justice by Trump. Period.’
CNN Senior Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin says the just-released written testimony of Jim Comey “establishes obstruction of justice.”Â
Earlier Wednesday afternoon the Senate Intelligence Committee published former FBI Director Jim Comey’s prepared written testimony, a seven-page staggeringly detailed statement that all but indicts President Donald Trump.
Comey’s statement establishes obstruction of justice by Trump. Period.
— Jeffrey Toobin (@JeffreyToobin) June 7, 2017
“Let’s just keep this in perspective,” Toobin said on CNN. “There is a criminal investigation going on of one of the President’s top associates, his former National Security Advisor,” Toobin says, speaking of Mike Flynn.
“He gets fired. He’s under criminal investigation and the President brings in the FBI Director and says, ‘Please stop your investigation.’ If that isn’t obstruction of justice, I don’t know what is,” Toobin said forcefully.
“If [this] isn’t obstruction of justice, I don’t know what is”: Jeffrey Toobin reacts to Comey’s prepared testimony https://t.co/fCg15m1Sdn pic.twitter.com/qDicj7Ceeh
— CNN (@CNN) June 7, 2017
Toobin continues:Â “What makes this so deeply sinister, is the Mike Flynn stuff.”
“What makes this so deeply sinister, is the Mike Flynn stuff” @JeffreyToobin https://t.co/g1P5bw1J0f https://t.co/4RpfYpemgT
— CNN Newsroom (@CNNnewsroom) June 7, 2017
Former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who Trump fired a few months ago after promising him he would be able to keep his job, just posted this to Twitter:
Obstruction aside, it’s NEVER ok for a POTUS privately to ask an FBI Director to drop a criminal investigation. Extraordinary, wrong & dumb. https://t.co/Axwjoaw8F7
— Preet Bharara (@PreetBharara) June 7, 2017
Finally, Lawfare Blog’s Benjamin Wittes calls the Comey written testimony, “the most shocking single document compiled about the official conduct of the public duties of any President since the release of the Watergate tapes.” He points out an “effort on the part of the President to engage his FBI director in a relationship of patronage,” and states: “Comey is describing here conduct that a society committed to the rule of law simply cannot accept in a president.”
Wittes adds, “this document is about a far more important question to the preservation of liberty in a society based on legal norms and rules: the abuse of the core functions of the presidency. It’s about whether we can trust the President—not the President in the abstract, but the particular embodiment of the presidency in the person of Donald J. Trump—to supervise the law enforcement apparatus of the United States in fashion consistent with his oath of office. I challenge anyone to read this document and come away with a confidently affirmative answer to that question.”
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page.

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |