WATCH: Asked About LGBT Rights and Same-Sex Marriage SCOTUS Nominee Neil Gorsuch Appears Indignant
‘And I’m Telling You I Don’t’
An appeals court judge for nearly 11 years, Neil Gorsuch isn’t used to being asked questions for hours at a time. No doubt being grilled by well-prepared Senators as the cameras send your every movement to possibly millions watching can be unnerving. But Judge Gorsuch, at the half-way mark of his second day appears to be showing signs of hostility, anger, and an overall indignation during his Supreme Court hearings.
Asked by Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), a lawmaker since 1983, about his relationship with his homophobic mentor at Oxford, when he wrote a dissertation arguing against same-sex marriage, abortion, and assisted suicide, Gorsuch grew indignant.
.@SenatorDurbin asks about LGBTQ rights. #Gorsuchhearing pic.twitter.com/YKx5JAdP2z
— CSPAN (@cspan) March 21, 2017
“What about LGBTQ individuals?” Sen. Durbin asked.Â
“What about them?” Gorsuch asked, seemingly frustrated or angry. “They’re people,” Gorsuch replied, shaking his head.
“Of course,” Durbin continued. “What you said earlier was that you had a record of speaking out, standing up for those minorities who you believe are not being treated fairly. Can you point to statements or cases you’ve ruled on relative to that class?” he asked.
“Senator, I’ve tried to treat each case and each person as a person — not a ‘this kind of person,’ not a ‘that kind of person’ — a person. Equal justice under law. It is a radical promise in the history of mankind,” Gorsuch stated.Â
“Does that refer to sexual orientation, as well?” Durbin asked.Â
“Senator, the Supreme Court of the United States has held that single-sex marriage is protected by the Constitution,” Gorsuch, indignantly, responded.
Remember, Gorsuch penned a dissertation opposing same-sex marriage just 13 years ago. He voted with the majority and wrote a concurring opinion in the Hobby Lobby case that declared corporations are people and have religious rights that are protected under the Constitution.
He has no right to be indignant.
Gorsuch did not reign in his indignation there. As Sen. Durbin continued his questioning, asking about maternity leave, Gorsuch could barely hide his anger.
Senator Durbin asked, “Do you beleive there are ever situations where the costs to an employer of maternity leave can justify an employer asking only female applicants and not male applicants about family plans?”
“Senator, those are not my words and I would never had said them,” Gorsuch, angered, shaking his head, answered.
“I didn’t say that,” Sen. Durbin replied. “I asked you if you agreed with the statement.”
“And I’m telling you I don’t,” Gorsuch, tensely, retorted.
.@SenatorDurbin asks Judge Gorsuch about maternity leave and family planning. #GorsuchHearing pic.twitter.com/ttPzczezTJ
— CSPAN (@cspan) March 21, 2017
Â
Â

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |