Trump Doubles Down On Blatant Lie About Intelligence Report On Russian Hacking
President-Elect Again Falsely Claims Hacking Didn’t Affect Election Results
Intelligence stated very strongly there was absolutely no evidence that hacking affected the election results. Voting machines not touched!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 7, 2017
Only reason the hacking of the poorly defended DNC is discussed is that the loss by the Dems was so big that they are totally embarrassed!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 7, 2017
President-elect Donald Trump took to Twitter on Saturday morning (above) to repeat what has already been exposed as a blatant lie.
After being briefed by intelligence agencies Friday on Russian hacking of the U.S. election, Trump issued a statement saying the cyberattacks had “absolutely on impact on the outcome of the election.”Â
In fact, the agencies that complied the report didn’t attempt to assess the actual impact of President Vladimir Putin’s “influence campaign,” according to a declassified version that was later made public. Rather, they merely determined that Putin had “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary [Hillary] Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.â€
“We did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had on the outcome of the 2016 election,†the report concluded. “The US Intelligence Community is charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities, and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion.”Â
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9Kp1S3yABA
On Friday night, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow said (video above) that Trump’s apparent willingness to lie to the American public about such a critical matter of U.S. intelligence “puts a shiver down my spine.†Hours later, the president-elect repeated his claim.Â
“Intelligence stated very strongly there was absolutely no evidence that hacking affected the election results,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “Voting machines not touched!”
It’s true that the intelligence agencies found no evidence of actual tampering with ballots, although they did conclude that the Russians “obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local electoral boards.”
But it goes without saying that you don’t have to touch voting machines to influence an election — especially one that was decided by only 80,000 people in three states. Reports about hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee dominated media coverage and contributed to Republican conspiracies about Clinton’s use of a private server. Â
“Only reason the hacking of the poorly defended DNC is discussed is that the loss by the Dems was so big that they are totally embarrassed!” Trump added.Â
Clinton won the popular vote by 2.8 million.
Reactions from Twitter below.Â
Someone is being very defensive. You repeatedly used material Moscow swiped & leaked as pol. ammo, hoping it would have an impact. https://t.co/rVFAcID8AK
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) January 7, 2017
Putin’s @realDonaldTrump tweets again this am. It’s clear which side he’s on. So much for “America First.” https://t.co/ZjKCoSY4Pn
— Jimmy LaSalvia (@JimmyLaSalvia) January 7, 2017
When Watergate was being investigated, did people argue “well, break in didn’t effect the outcome, so no big deal?”
— Michael McFaul (@McFaul) January 6, 2017
You, @realDonaldTrump, are disloyal to our nation. Pack your treachery, your instability, and your hatred of America and leave the country. pic.twitter.com/J0zPheP9gC
— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) January 7, 2017
Really dangerous to have a president who lies about intelligence. Report couldn’t have been clearer they did not assess the impact. https://t.co/c294IKkOXC
— Matthew Miller (@matthewamiller) January 7, 2017
Our next President is willing to mislead the American people to protect his Russian allies and his ego. Voting machines are not the issue. https://t.co/IcwHvEtTKX
— Evan McMullin (@Evan_McMullin) January 7, 2017
Also, the Russians did not kill Hillary Clinton’s pets. If you’re going to throw out red herrings to distract people, get creative! https://t.co/QGbrDRevO9
— Amanda Marcotte (@AmandaMarcotte) January 7, 2017
This time we know he’s lying because there is a public report. 99% of the time when he’s president, we won’t.
— Matthew Miller (@matthewamiller) January 7, 2017
This is a blatant lie. The report explicitly states that they did not make an assessment on that. https://t.co/A56WS8rTKo
— Brian Klaas (@brianklaas) January 7, 2017
President-elect seems to believe Russian hack to interfere w US election is no biggie https://t.co/vKgpxEaSPo
— Julie Davis (@juliehdavis) January 7, 2017
Big question here–Why is Trump attacking the victim (the DNC & the Dems) instead of the perpetrator of the crime, i.e. Putin & his hackers? https://t.co/9OnHobX65o
— Steven Greenhouse (@greenhousenyt) January 7, 2017
No, it’s discussed because it’s an unprecedented attack on American democracy by Vladimir Putin and Russia. https://t.co/OpyJBwHCCT
— Brian Klaas (@brianklaas) January 7, 2017
says candidate who lost the popular vote https://t.co/a5pLHcFEQ8
— Azi (@Azi) January 7, 2017
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.