Jeff Sessions Promises to Uphold ‘Statutes’ Protecting LGBT People. What Statutes? There Are Almost None.
It’s a Great Line. It Says Almost Nothing.
U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) during Tuesday morning’s Judiciary Committee hearing on his nomination to become attorney general went so far as to promise he would even support federal laws protecting LGBT people.Â
Sessions: I will ensure civil rights protections for African-Americans, women and LGBT people if attorney general https://t.co/eNEbpB1Ly7
— NBC News (@NBCNews) January 10, 2017
“I understand the demands for justice and fairness made by the LGBT community,” Sen. Sessions told the Judiciary Committee today. “I will ensure that the statutes protecting their rights and their safety are fully enforced.”
It’s a great line. It says almost nothing.
Please Is this first time Sessions has said “LGBT� & what statutes? We have no protections beyond hate crimes law, which he voted against.
— Mike Signorile (@MSignorile) January 10, 2017
Poll after poll after poll shows that about seven out of ten Americans believe there already is a federal law banning employers from firing LGBT people for being LGBT. The vast majority of Americans support a nondiscrimination law banning employers from firing people for being LGBT.
The loophole in Sessions’s comment is that there isn’t a blanket federal LGBT nondiscrimination “statute†like civil rights laws. https://t.co/QttK4VrKiI
— Dominic Holden (@dominicholden) January 10, 2017
But the simple fact is that no such law at the federal level exists. There is no ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, that has been introduced in Congress in one form or another in nearly every Congress since 1994, and similar bills have been introduced going back to 1974. They have never reached a President’s desk.
What Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions just testified about LGBT rights vs. the anti-LGBT stance his actual record shows. pic.twitter.com/Edob0EQH0y
— Cassie Dagostino (@casatino) January 10, 2017
Sen. Sessions also said same-sex marriage is settled law and he would uphold the U.S. Supreme Court’s Obergefell ruling, but he was not asked about related issues, such as adoption rights of LGBT people, or religious extremism, or state and local public accommodation laws that ban discrimination against LGBT people. Nor was he asked about the First Amendment Defense Act, an unconstitutional anti-LGBT bill being pushed by conservatives in the House and Senate.Â
Some more responses via Twitter:
The LGBT question I’d ask Sessions: Do you think bans on sex discrimination also ban discrimination on the basis of gender identity?
— Dominic Holden (@dominicholden) January 10, 2017
This question is critical for the next Justice Dept — does he think existing civil rights laws already ban transgender discrimination? https://t.co/jIqyA0st6i
— Dominic Holden (@dominicholden) January 10, 2017
In 2009(!), Sessions said that hate crimes protections for LGBT people “cheapen the civil rights movement.†https://t.co/MmzRh23E2d
— Matt McDermott (@mattmfm) January 10, 2017
Sessions, who said LGBT people don’t face discrimination, says he’ll protect them from discrimination. https://t.co/POxxAliY92
— Adam Smith (@asmith83) January 10, 2017
Yes, but Sessions’ anti-African-American history is much more well known than his abysmal record on #LGBT issues. BOTH = NO confirmation! https://t.co/OFNdPPldGl
— Gene Robinson (@BishopGRobinson) January 9, 2017
Jeff Sessions is a threat to #AfricanAmericans, #Muslims, #LGBT, #Women, and #Immigrants
He is unqualified to protect US civil rights laws!
— ANTONIO ARELLANO (@AntonioArellano) January 9, 2017
You can respond directly to Sen. Jeff Sessions by sending your comments to him on Twitter: @SenatorSessions and @jeffsessions.
Senator Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is on Twitter:Â @ChuckGrassley.
(Why are we including this information?)
To comment on this article and other NCRM content, visit our Facebook page. To contact NCRM directly you can email us.
Â

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |