Jill Stein: ‘We Should Not Be Subjecting Kids’ Brains’ to Wi-Fi
Green Party Leader Irresponsibly Dabbles in More Unsubstantiated Fear-Mongering
Jill Stein says parents and schools should not be exposing children to wi-fi and to TV or computer screens. The presumptive nominee of the Green Party who uses anti-vaccination activists’ fears as a sword to attack credible public institutions then falsely claims Americans hold an inherent and understandable distrust of government entities like the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), is also coming out against the very methods used to research her claims.
In a video posted to YouTube in March by a Maryland blog that advocates against “Industrial wireless systems in schools,” Dr. Stein (she has a medical degree from Harvard and reportedly practiced internal medicine for a quarter-century) responds to questions from parents about computers and wi-fi.
Tech site Gizmodo, which notes, “wi-fi has not been shown to harm humans in any way,” on Monday posted this transcript:
Person from crowd:Â My school district is rapidly moving towards one-to-one computers. Can you speak to the health issues? [inaudible with clapping]
Jill Stein: Wonderful, health issues… social issues… you name it. But to be staring at screens… we already know that kids who get put in front of TVs instead of interacting, this is not good in all kinds of ways. And it’s just not good for their cognitive, it’s not good for their social development, I mean, that is incredible that kids in kindergarten… We should be moving away from screens at all levels of education, not moving into them.Â
And this is another corporate ruse. This is another gimmick to try to make a buck. To make big bucks in fact. And education, and teachers, and communities suffer. So we need to stand up to that.
Person from crowd:Â What about the wireless?
Jill Stein: We should not be subjecting kids’ brains especially to that. And we don’t follow that issue in this country, but in Europe where they do, they have good precautions around wireless—maybe not good enough, because it’s very hard to study this stuff. We make guinea pigs out of whole populations and then we discover how many die. And this is like the paradigm for how public health works in this country and it’s outrageous, you know.
Stein goes on to falsely claim yet again, “people don’t buy what our regulatory agencies are telling us, we’ve completely lost trust in them.”
Watch:
Last week Dr. Stein announced that people have “real questions” about vaccines and claimed the general public’s level of “strong confidence” in regulatory agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is “somewhere around four percent,” which NCRM reported as false. Based on our research, just after the 2014 Ebola crisis 50 percent of Americans said the CDC is doing an “excellent” or “good” job, which was down from 60 percent in 2013.
Stein’s comments, which appeared in a Washington Post interview, forced her to post this tweet:
As a medical doctor of course I support vaccinations. I have a problem with the FDA being controlled by drug companies.
— Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) July 29, 2016
But as NCRM reported last week, while Stein isn’t anti-vaxx, she feeds off the false beliefs of anti-vaxxers to build her base. She sows seeds of doubt and mistrust in the safety of vaccines to tear down government institutions, then positions herself as the only one who can fix these “issues.” Over the weekend Stein actually deleted a tweet she had just posted, which said, “There’s no evidence that autism is caused by vaccines,†and replaced it with one that reads: “I’m not aware of evidence linking autism with vaccines.â€
I’m not aware of evidence linking autism with vaccines. Let’s do more to support autistic people & their families. https://t.co/eISgfxQ5vm
— Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) July 31, 2016
Which once again proves Stein is feeding off the anti-vaxx crowd to build her base.
And which sounds glaringly like the Republican nominee for president’s tactics.
Â
Image by Gage Skidmore via Flickr and a CC license

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |