Breaking: Supreme Court Punts on Important Obamacare Contraception Case
Rules for Both Sides, But States Women Must Be Allowed to Obtain Contraception
The U.S. Supreme Court has just released a narrow ruling that says religious employers, like churches, mosques, and synagogues, are exempt from the Obamacare policy that mandates all employers provide contraception coverage for their employees. However, the ruling also states that those same employees must be provided access to that coverage.
ZUBIK. Court punts, remanding cases in per curiam decision so parties can “arrive at an approach” to “accommodate” both sides. #SCOTUS
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) May 16, 2016
In short, initial reports are saying the Supreme Court has “punted,” likely because it was deadlocked and did not want the ruling to merely echo the lower court’s ruling.
BREAKING: SCOTUS rules in favor of religious exception in Obamacare contraception coverage https://t.co/bahnKgDkkH
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) May 16, 2016
The case, Zubik v. Burwell, “was a consolidation of cases brought by religious nonprofits, including The Little Sister’s of the Poor, who objected to the work-around set up by the Obama administration to provide contraceptive coverage to employees of organizations opposed to birth control on religious grounds,” Talking Points Memo reports.
“The non-profits said that even filling out the form or sending a government the letter declaring their objections to covering birth control was a burden on their faith, because it set in motion the process by which their employees received the coverage from their insurers, though that coverage was not paid for or part of the employer plans. Lower courts’ have overwhelmingly rejected the challengers’ argument that the workaround violated 1993’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).”
Scotus is punting the Obamacare contraceptive cases back to federal appeals courts for possible compromise. https://t.co/v2gRcSm3QR (pdf)
— Charles Ornstein (@charlesornstein) May 16, 2016
UPDATE I: 10:48 AM EDT –
In short the Supreme Court sent the case back to the lower court, but in a rare move, suggested an outcome.
Â
This is a breaking news and developing story. Details may change. This story will be updated, and NCRM will likely publish follow-up stories on this news. Stay tuned and refresh for updates.Â

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |