Connect with us

Chief Justice Roy Moore: Same-Sex Marriage Ruling ‘Is Going To Destroy The Nation’

Published

on

Alabama’s Chief Justice isn’t taking the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on marriage lying down – now comes the full assault.

Roy Moore is at it again. Not content to sit back and accept the ruling of the nations highest court, he is making it his mission to continue to do his best to sow confusion and lies in his war on the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry.

The Alabama Chief Justice talked with anti-choice activist Randall Terry yesterday, and in an hour-long interview made outrageous claims, including that Supreme Court’s ruling on same-sex marriage will be the end on America.

“Do you think that this ruling could unravel the republic – or unravel our liberties,” Terry asked.

“I think it’s going to destroy the nation,” Moore was quick to respond.

Instead of pushing back on such an outrageous claim, Terry, pushing for anti-gay states to secede from the nation, was only too happy to pursue it. “There’s people taking about [secession] in Texas,” he told Moore.

“Do you think we’re a free people?,” Terry asked.

We’re supposed to be a free people,” Moore said, almost smirking, “and if this carries out the way I think it’s going to carry out, it’s going to be very doubtful.”

Watch:

 

RELATED:

Chief Justice Roy Moore’s Top Lawyer Says ‘Public Officials Are Ministers Of God’

Watch: Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore Claims Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Ruling Not In Effect

Outraged Judge Roy Moore Vents From Behind His Wife’s Skirts

 

Image: Screenshot via Randall Terry/YouTube
Hat tip and video via Right Wing Watch

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

'REMARKABLY THIN'

‘Flaccid Little Cry Baby’: Legal Experts Weigh in on Trump’s ‘Not Very Strong’ Lawsuit to Block Jan. 6 Committee

Published

on

Donald Trump has just filed a lawsuit to block the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack from being granted access to a mountain of documents from his four years as president held by the National Archives.

Legal experts are weighing in on this latest attempt by the former president to obstruct a lawful investigation.

NBC News reports Trump’s lawsuit “says the committee’s subpoena is invalid because it has no power of investigation,” and it “says the material should be protected by executive privilege,” which is also false, according to countless legal experts who have been commenting on that claim for weeks.

Trump is “requesting that the court invalidate the committee’s requests and enjoin the archivist from turning over the records in question. At a bare minimum, the court should enjoin the archivist from producing any potentially privileged records until President Trump is able to conduct a full privilege review of all of the requested materials.”

Top national security lawyer Bradley Moss appears to be enjoying mocking the lawsuit:

CNN’s Keith Boykin, a former Clinton White House aide who has a law degree from Harvard Law weighed in on the news by blasting Trump, saying: “This guy has spent his entire career bluffing his way through life, evading responsibility, dodging accountability, and filing frivolous lawsuits to distract and delay. Justice means nothing in America if Trump is not held accountable for his crimes.”

Attorney and upcoming author Luppe B. Luppen:

Former Obama White House attorney, now a Law Professor at Cardozo Law and Supreme Court contributor for ABC News calls the suit “remarkably thin.”

.

Continue Reading

'DEMASCULATE'

Watch: Madison Cawthorn Urges Mothers of Young Boys to ‘Raise Them to Be a Monster’

Published

on

U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn is urging parents to turn their young children into monsters.

The North Carolina Republican Congressman lamented that American “culture is trying to completely demasculate all the young men,” presumably meaning “emasculate.”

“You can look at testosterone levels in young men today, and they are lower than throughout all of history,” he added.

“But my friends they’re trying to demasculate the young men in this country ’cause they don’t want people who are going to stand up.”

“If you are raising a young man, raise them to be a monster,” he urged mothers, to applause.

The clip was posted by Right Wing Watch:

 

Continue Reading

'HIRED ACTOR'

Psaki Again Destroys Doocy So Bad Some Are Asking if He Is a ‘Deep State’ Actor or a ‘Plant’ to Make Her Look Good

Published

on

White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki’s near-daily ritual of educating Peter Doocy took such a dramatic step up on Monday some are asking if perhaps the Fox News correspondent is a “plant” or a “deep state hired actor” designed to make her look good.

When today’s exchange was all done Psaki had reminded Doocy that Trump “used his office to incite an insurrection,” and “put political pressure on senior DOJ officials to propagate lies about the election to the point where they threaten to resign en masse.”

Doocy Monday afternoon had jumped on President Joe Biden’s response to a reporter’s question Friday. When asked if the January 6 Committee’s subpoenas against those who refuse to comply should be enforced, the President said they should be.

Some, including Doocy, are accusing Biden of reneging on a promise to not weigh in on the Justice Dept.’s decisions whether or not to prosecute cases – something Donald Trump did on a regular basis. But enforcing a subpoena is not deciding whether or not to prosecute a case. The DOJ, or, in this case, U.S, Attorneys, have a legal mandate to enforce congressional subpoenas.

Here’s part of the exchange:

And here’s how people are responding:

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.