Connect with us

Jon Stewart: ‘How F*cking Removed From Reality Is Fox News?’ (Video)



Jon Stewart destroys Fox News as “removed from reality,” in an exposé of their coverage of poverty and, ironically, Fox News.

Wednesday night Jon Stewart wasn’t going to take any more “lying and sucking” from Fox News. The right wing cable “news” channel had taken on President Barack Obama this week, attacking him for comments they says he made about Fox News. Of course, Fox News’ paranoia had taken hold, so, had they reported the actual story and the President’s remarks in context, it would have been a very different report.

Stewart took the issue of poverty to expose Fox News. He showed clips from Fox News over the years accusing President Obama of ignoring poverty, while reminding them that Obama “has been addressing those issues his entire presidency.” And he summed up Fox News’ position, in clips, that poverty “is not a function of economic condition, but of character.”

And Stewart focused on Fox News host Stuart Varney, who called his employer “the honest messengers” who don’t allow Obama to “spin his own policy failures.”

Then Stewart turned to Varney claiming Fox News never says “the recipients of food stamps are bad people, or that they’re lazy.” 

So of course Stewart, calling Varney’s lie “a rich buffet of bullsh*t,” then played a montage of Fox News calling recipients of food stamps bad people and lazy, with segments like “Entitlement Nation,” “Who’s Ruining The Economy?,” “United States of Entitlement,” “Entitlement Society,” and “You Make It, They Take It.” 

That was followed by clips of comments by Fox News hosts, anchors, and guests, saying, “the moocher class,” “subsidized freeloaders,” “nation of moochers,” “entitlement mentality,” “sitting on the couch eating bon-bons,” and more.

That was too much for Stewart.

“How fucking removed from reality is Fox’s perception of their own coverage on poverty?,” he demanded to know. “The main defender of your network’s attitude towards those in poverty, is the main offender,” Stewart said of Varney. “He does segments that would make Ebenezer Scrooge go, ‘Hey, take it easy, these are people we’re talking about.'”

He went on to show clip after clip after clip of Varney attacking poor people, and saying that “the image we have of poor people as starving and living in squalor really is not accurate. Many of them have things, what they lack is the richness of spirit.”

Stewart’s frustration was evident.

“Are these glaring contradictions a product of lack of self-awareness, or cynicism, or stupidity, or evil?” Stewart posited. “I don’t know anymore, and I’m starting to lack a richness of fucks.”

He then took on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Joe Scarborough, who had defended Fox News, suggesting he has never heard Fox News call “poor people leaches, sponges, and lazy.” 

So, Stewart was obligated to show clips of Fox News calling poor people leaches, sponges, and lazy.

And he slammed Scarborough for not even bothering to do any research before offering his opinion, in “our favorite game show, ‘Did You Even Try To Research This?'”


Image: Screenshot via Comedy Central


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.


Just 9 Republicans Joined Democrats to Uphold the Rule of Law and Vote to Hold Steve Bannon in Criminal Contempt



Only nine House Republicans joined with every Democrat in voting to hold Trump ally Steve Bannon in criminal contempt of Congress. Thursday afternoon’s final vote was 229-202.

Bannon refused to obey a lawful congressional subpoena ordering him to hand over documents and to submit to congressional investigators for a deposition. His legal defense was mocked by experts after he tried to invoke executive privilege.

Minority Whip Steve Scalise had directed House Republicans to vote against the motion.

Top voting rights attorney Marc Elias warns against praising the nine Republicans for doing the right thing in this one instance: “all nine of them voted against voting rights legislation,” he tweeted.

Continue Reading


‘Act of War’: Trump Blasted for ‘Chilling’ Statement Calling Election an ‘Insurrection’



Donald Trump, the twice-impeached former president, on Thursday issued what is being called a “chilling” statement on the election and the insurrection he incited.

“The insurrection took place on November 3, Election Day. January 6 was the Protest!” Trump said in a statement released Thursday afternoon.

Former Republican Congressman Joe Walsh simply and clearly calls it an “act of war.”

U.S. Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) during debate on the House floor has “repeatedly” been “calling on Republicans to denounce the Trump statement,” according to reporter Jamie Dupree.

“All my colleagues were elected on November 3,” McGovern said. “If you believe that Election Day was an insurrection, then your election results are illegitimate.”

McGovern is not the only one to blast the Trump statement:

Some journalists are also slamming the former president’s latest remarks.

S.V. Dáte, the White House correspondent at HuffPost weighed in, saying, “Donald Trump tried to overthrow American democracy after he lost his election by 7 million votes, but nearly a year later, he’s still lying. About all of it.”

Washington Post national political reporter Felicia Sonmez called it a “chilling statement … that makes clear his stance on peaceful democracy vs. violent insurrection.”

Washington Post White House bureau chief Ashley Parker pointed to the statement and said: “In which Trump’s shamelessness continues to be his political super power.”

ProPublica Senior Reporter Peter Elkind says: “This is the position of the widely embraced leader of the GOP. Republicans all behind that?”




Continue Reading


Watch: Garland Destroys GOP Congressman’s False Suggestion His School Board Memo Calls Parents Terrorists



U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland Thursday morning was forced to respond to repeated Republican false claims about his memo directing the DOJ to hold “discussions” with local leaders about threats of violence made against school board members, and several times had to push back hard against false accusations made by GOP Congressmen.

Franklin Graham, Stephen Miller, and countless others on the right for weeks have been falsely claiming that Garland has ordered DOJ to investigate parents merely for opposing school board decisions, mostly on mask mandates and what they claim is “critical race theory.”

U.S. Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH) on Wednesday during a Judiciary Committee hearing falsely suggested Garland was calling parents’ challenging school boards domestic terrorists.

“One example of a so-called terrorist incident was a parent, merely questioning whether school board members had earned their high school diplomas. Now that might have been rude, but does that seem like an act of domestic terrorism that you or your Justice Department ought to be investigating?” Chabot asked.

“Absolutely not,” Garland replied. “And I want to be clear the Justice Department supports and defends the First Amendment right of parents to complain as vociferously as they wish, about the education of their children, about the curriculum taught in the schools. That is not what the memorandum is about at all, nor does it use the words ‘domestic terrorism’ or ‘Patriot Act.’ Like you, I can’t imagine any circumstance in which the Patriot Act would be used in the circumstances of parents complaining about their children, nor can I imagine a circumstance where they would be labeled as domestic terrorism.”

As NCRM has previously reported, school board members and educators in at least nine states this year have been targeted with threats, death threats, and often racist death threats, including in Virginia, Arizona, Connecticut, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Vermont, according to local news reports.

Ironically, it was Congressman Chabot who, a decade ago, was legitimately accused of violating the First Amendment when his staffers directed local police to confiscate video cameras at the Congressman’s town hall event, held in a public school.

Chabot, ruffled and rebuffed by Garland’s response, decided to end the inquiry there.

“Thank you I’m nearly out of time.”


Continue Reading


Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.