Connect with us

Ben Carson: Gays Are More Protected Than Christians (Video)

Published

on

Ben Carson strongly suggests that Christians are persecuted, and gay people are more protected than Christians and other people of faith. Let’s unpack just how ridiculous that is.

Retired neurosurgeon and likely 2016 Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson once again sat down with CNN’s Chris Cuomo and debated civil rights for the LGBT community Thursday morning. A far more demure and reserved Carson attempted to keep his promise to not discuss LGBT issues, but was soon overcome by Cuomo’s questioning, including the reminded that as president he would not get to “pick and choose” which topic he wanted to discuss.

In the video above, Carson tells Cuomo that a “person’s sexual orientation” is a topic that is “a fair amount of concern to you,” adding, “I don’t find it to be anywhere as interesting.”

The 2008 Presidential Medal of Freedom award winner added, “I think it’s a personal issue, and we ought to leave it as a personal issue.” That position is the same espoused by many anti-LGBT activists and organizations, who believe that, for example, a gay person talking with their co-workers about their weekend is “jamming their sexuality down our throats,” but a straight person talking with their co-workers about their weekend is just talking.

“I respect the LGBT community,” Carson said, all evidence to the contrary, including his claim that prison is proof that being gay is a choice. “I respect the traditional marriage community,” he added. “Leave it to the personal, issues, to the personal people.”

Cuomo reminded Dr. Carson that the LGBT community doesn’t have the same rights and the U.S. Supreme Court will soon be taking up marriage.

“I would like to see as much emphasis on the rights of Christians and people who are members of the faith community as there is to some of the other groups,” said Carson, who two weeks ago called the Indiana “religious freedom” law “absolutely vital.” 

Asked, “Who gets more protection? Christians? Or LGBT people under the law?

“I would like to see a much greater conservation about Christians and their rights,” Carson responded. “Why are we not talking about that?,” he accused Cuomo.

“I think we are right now, doctor” Cuomo said. “The LGBT community gets far less legal protection, under the Constitution, as you know—”

“No, not as I know,” Carson objected, smirking.

“How do you not know that?” Cuomo asked. “A protected class is religion, not LGBT.”

In most states, only recently, same-sex couples can now marry. But in most states, the moment they put their wedding photo on their desk they can be fired for being gay. Dr. Carson cannot possibly be unaware of that fact.

Carson then went down the Republican rabbit hole.

“The important thing is for us as a nation to recognize that all citizens of the United States are protected by our Constitution,” Carson said. “We need to stop deciding that one group versus another is the flavor of the day.”

The former pediatric neurosurgeon, author of six bestselling Christian books, and accused plagiarist, then said that he disagreed with Barack Obama – whom he recently called a “psychopath“ – over the President’s call last night to ban harmful “ex-gay” therapy for minors. Carson said it should be a personal decision.

Carson in the past has equated homosexuality with bestiality and pedophilia.

 

Related:

Republican Political Strategist: Ben Carson Is ‘Untethered To Reality’ (Video)

‘Insane’: What Experts Say About Dr. Ben Carson’s Claim That Prison Turns Men Gay

Ben Carson: People Upset Over My Poisoned Gay Wedding Cake ‘Joke’ Are Being ‘Immature’

 

Image: Screenshot via CNN
Hat tip: Mediaite

 

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Ethics Committee Reveals Latest Republican to Come Under Review: Report

Published

on

The House Ethics Committee has reportedly announced that U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) is facing a review by the Office of Congressional Conduct.

The origin of the review was not been disclosed. Under committee rules, officials are prohibited from stating whether the matter constitutes a formal investigation or identifying its underlying cause. The Committee only stated that there is a “matter regarding Representative Nancy Mace.”

“The Committee notes that the mere fact of a referral or an extension, and the mandatory disclosure of such an extension and the name of the subject of the matter, does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred, or reflect any judgment on behalf of the Committee,” the Ethics Committee statement reads. It was posted to social media by congressional journalist Jamie Dupree.

The statement also says the committee will “announce its course of action in this matter on or before March 2, 2026.”

Congresswoman Mace is currently running for governor of South Carolina.

Earlier this month Mace warned that Republicans may lose control of the House, saying they have not “done enough” and could “do a lot more” to implement President Donald Trump’s agenda, The Hill reported.

 

Image via Shutterstock 

Continue Reading

News

Republican Vows to Block Trump’s Greenland Push

Published

on

A prominent Republican lawmaker is vowing to thwart any attempt by President Donald Trump to acquire Greenland through force or financial means.

Speaking from Copenhagen as part of a bipartisan delegation of U.S. congressional lawmakers, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), told reporters it is “an important message for the people of the Kingdom of Denmark to understand” that the United States has “three separate but equal branches” of government.

Reminding them that under the U.S. Constitution it is Congress that controls spending, Senator Murkowski, who has broken ranks and stood up to President Trump at times, said, “In Congress, we have tools at our disposal under our constitutional authority that speaks specifically to the power of the purse through appropriations.”

She noted also that “Congress has a role. Certainly, when it comes to spending authorities, the Congress has a role in basically helping to facilitate the message that comes from our constituents, to be reflected in whether it’s legislation or appropriations, or actions or measures, that can indicate, again, the will of the Congress.”

READ MORE: Trump Dangles Another Insurrection Act Threat for Minnesota

The “vast majority” of Americans do not support the acquisition of Greenland, Senator Murkowski added, noting that “some 75 percent will say we do not think that that is a good idea.”

“Greenland needs to be viewed as our ally, not as an asset,” Murkowski also told reporters.

Politico reported that U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) “also took part in the visit by House and Senate lawmakers,” and “said he would push ahead with legislation to curb Trump’s power to act unilaterally.”

He also denied President Trump’s claims that Greenland is necessary to be owned by the U.S. for national security reasons.

“Are there real, pressing threats to the security of Greenland from China and Russia?” Coons said. “No, not today.”

READ MORE: With Shutdown Looming and Crises Growing Trump Heads Off for Long Mar-a-Lago Weekend

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

Trump Dangles Another Insurrection Act Threat for Minnesota

Published

on

Just one day after threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minnesota, which would allow him to unleash domestic military forces onto American streets, President Donald Trump once again on Friday hinted he would do so while suggesting he may be “forced” to take action.

Trump targeted Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, both Democrats, claiming they “don’t know what to do” after he deployed roughly 3,000 federal troops to the city.

“In Minnesota,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, “the Troublemakers, Agitators, and Insurrectionists are, in many cases, highly paid professionals.”

“The Governor and Mayor don’t know what to do, they have totally lost control, and our currently being rendered, USELESS! If, and when, I am forced to act, it will be solved, QUICKLY and EFFECTIVELY!”

The Guardian labeled Trump’s claims that protesters are paid as baseless.

Attorney Aaron Reichlin-Melnick wrote: “Note that the Trump admin hasn’t yet been able to produce evidence of a SINGLE ‘paid protestor.’ They’ve had total control of the FBI and the DOJ and ICE HSI and yet despite all of that, they can’t even find ONE person who they can accuse of being paid to protest.”

Separately, The Steady State, a group of over 365 former national security officials, while not referring to Trump’s remarks from Friday morning, noted that the Insurrection Act is “an extraordinary power meant for true emergencies, not a shield for unconstitutional policing. Using it to silence dissent or justify unlawful paramilitary activity at the hand of ICE undermines the rule of law.”

READ MORE: With Shutdown Looming and Crises Growing Trump Heads Off for Long Mar-a-Lago Weekend

 

Image via Reuters

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.