Connect with us

Christian College President: We Canceled Bake Sale For LGBT Homeless Youth Because Of Their ‘Advocacy’



The President of a Christian college says his school is happy to support LGBT homeless youth, but not an LGBT homeless youth non-profit because of its “advocacy” stance.

Andrews University is the largest evangelical Christian institution of higher learning in Michigan and the first in the nation started by the Seventh-day Adventist Church. It boasts over 3400 students, an endowment reported at more than $26 million, and a history that began in 1874, in Battle Creek – the same town where John H. Kellogg, also a Seventh-day Adventist, founded a sanitarium and the company that today is best know for making Corn Flakes.

Andrews, headed by President Niels-Erik Andreasen, has a challenging relationship with the LGBT community. 

Recently, students decided to hold a bake sale to help LGBT homeless youth. AULL4One, the college’s unofficial gay-straight alliance – unofficial because Andrews is a Christian evangelical university – chose as the beneficiary of the bake sale a non-profit named Project Fierce Chicago.

But Andrews, even though they do not recognize AULL4One as an official student group and do not allow them to advertise on campus their meetings or events, had another idea.

David Ferguson at Raw Story reports that Andrews has forbidden the students to hold the bake sale benefitting LGBT homeless youth “because to do so would ‘conflict’ with the university’s ‘mission and practices.'”

Steve Yeagley, Andrews’ Dean of Student Life, in an email sent to AULL4One’s Eliel Cruz and published by Blue Nation Review and Raw Story, explained the university’s decision.

“I think the most helpful thing I can do is to draw your attention to the fundraising policy found in the Student Handbook. It simply states that funds may be raised for non-profit organizations ‘whose mission and practices do not conflict with those of the University.’ I think the judgment in this case is that there may be a perceived conflict between the mission and practices of Andrews University and those of Fierce Chicago — certainly not in their efforts to aid homeless youth, but in their approach to the LGBT issue, at large.”

What is their approach?

Fierce Chicago’s website says their “aim is to become a largely self-sustaining community,” and they “will provide transitional housing for 8-10 LGBTQ young people ages 18-25, for an initial term of one year.”

Apparently that’s a bit too radical for Andrews and for its President, Niels-Erik Andreasen.

Andrews spokesperson Becky St. Clair told The New Civil Rights Movement by telephone that President Andreasen crafted a statement in response to news reports. That statement says that “Andrews University recognizes the special challenges facing LGBT youth and believes that efforts to help them are worthy.”

But Andreasen, who reportedly had a hand in canceling the bake sale, also states the school’s “objection” to the fundraiser is due to Fierce Chicago’s “advocacy.”

“Andrews University has declined a student request to officially endorse a fundraising effort to raise money for an organization that may have a perceived LGBT advocacy role,” Andreasen’s statement reads. Even though AULL4One went through proper channels, and even got an official student group, Campus Ministries, to sponsor the event, without the school’s official endorsement the event has to be canceled.

Andreasen adds, “our objection was not to the worthy goal of serving LGBT homeless youth and their transitional housing needs but to the perceived advocacy stance of the proposed organization.”

On the school’s Facebook page last fall appears a photo (above) of Pres. Andreasen holding a sign that reads, “Live United.” He is quoted in that post saying, “Doing good things together is better: Live united.”

AULL4One has decided to move forward. Their original goal for the bake sale was to raise $2000. Instead, they have sent up an Indiegogo fundraising page that currently has taken in nearly $5000. 


Image via Facebook

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.


‘Flashback Much?’: Senator Mocked for Saying IG Report Made Him Feel Like He Had ‘Dropped Acid’



“About 25 percent of the way through it I thought I dropped acid. It’s surreal.”

A prominent Republican Senator is getting his own special due process on social media after using his precious time to question U.S. Dept. of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz by saying reading the 434 page report on the FBI’s Russia investigation was like dropping acid.

U.S. Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) admitted to Horowitz on Wednesday that he had not finished reading the lengthy document but was about 70 percent done. He also appeared to be trying to make the infractions about FISA warrants committed by FBI agents to be seen as unprecedented and historically offensive, in an attempt to serve President Donald Trump by damaging the reputation of the FBI.

“About 15 percent of the way through it made me want to heave,” Sen. Kennedy announced. “About 25 percent of the way through it I thought I dropped acid. It’s surreal.”

Someone can be heard laughing in the background.

Kennedy chose to focus on the misconduct by the FBI agents instead of on the actual investigation, which the Inspector General found to be warranted: that is, opening up the Russia probe to determine not only how Putin and his cronies attacked the U.S. election but to what extent any Trump campaign officials may have been involved.

The Louisiana Republican Senator was not done. He made clear someone would have to pay for the misdeeds.

Apparently it would not matter to Kennedy who.

“I hope you’ll tell your colleagues at the FBI that we appreciate their work, but this has got to be fixed. At minimum someone’s got to be fired,” he announced.

Many were perplexed and shared their concerns about Sen. Kennedy on social media.


Continue Reading


Ted Cruz ‘Just Pumped Nonsensical Disinformation Into American Air Waves’: Former FBI Special Agent



During his turn to question Inspector General Michael Horowitz today, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) didn’t really ask many questions, and instead chose to use his time to rant about what he believes are the corrupt origins of the investigation into Russia’s alleged collusion with the Trump campaign.

In a tweet, MSNBC’s Clint Watts wrote that Cruz “just pumped several minutes of nonsensical disinformation into American air waves.”

Watch Cruz’s rant in the video below:

Related: Lindsey Graham Explodes in Anger Demanding to Know Why FBI ‘Didn’t Tell Trump’ His Campaign Was Under Investigation



Continue Reading


Lindsey Graham Explodes in Anger Demanding to Know Why FBI ‘Didn’t Tell Trump’ His Campaign Was Under Investigation



Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham exploded in anger as he questioned Inspector General Michael Horowitz, demanding to know why the FBI did not notify then-candidate Donald Trump and his campaign in 2016 that they were the subjects of a counterintelligence investigation to determine how Russia was attacking the U.S. and if any members of the Trump campaign were involved.

Chairman Graham appeared to ignore all the signs that Donald Trump and his campaign may have been conspiring with Russia to win the 2016 presidential election, including Trump’s infamous “Russia, if you’re listening” remarks.

The FBI “never made any effort to brief Donald Trump about suspected problems within his campaign,” Graham lamented, again, ignoring the FBI was working to determine if Trump or anyone else was colluding with Russia.

The FBI did warn the Trump campaign Russia was working to undermine the election. Trump appears to have taken that warning as an invitation to an opportunity to win the election rather than to protect the nation.

“Why did they not tell him that” people like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos might be working wirh Russia, Graham asked.

Graham later says, “I hope all of us would appreciate if you really believe there may be somebody in my campaign working with a foreign power, please tell me. Why didn’t they tell Trump?”

Again, the FBI likely had reason to suspect Trump was that somebody.

Despite all this, the RNC opted to immediately post a clip of Graham defending Trump on YouTube and Twitter (below).


Continue Reading


Copyright © 2019 AlterNet Media.