Christian Conservatives Slam Sarah Palin’s ‘Baptism By Waterboarding’ Speech As ‘Blasphemous’

Sarah Palin over the weekend delivered a rambling speech at the NRA convention that included the promise that if she were president, America’s enemies “would know that waterboarding is how we’d baptize terrorists.” Palin came under attack almost immediately — from her base of Christian conservatives who repeatedly are using the word “blasphemous” and “sacrilegious” to describe it. 

In case you missed it:

Christian conservatives, in fact, are furious. So what does Palin do? Reveal again she does not understand the First Amendment, as she attacks MSNBC on her Facebook page:

Actions to stop terrorists who’d utterly annihilate America and delight in massacring our innocent children? Darn right I’d do whatever it takes to foil their murderous jihadist plots – including waterboarding. Whatever one thinks of my one-liner at the NRA rally about treating evil terrorists the way they deserve to be treated to prevent the death of innocent people, it’s utterly absurd for MSNBC to suggest that I could put our beloved troops in harm’s way, but we’ve come to expect the absurd from that failing network.

…

If some overly sensitive wusses took offense, remember the First Amendment doesn’t give you a right not to be offended. Perhaps hypocritical folks who only want Freedom of Speech to apply to those who agree with their liberal agenda might want to consider that the evil terrorists who were the brunt of my one-liner would be the first to strip away ALL our rights if given the chance. That’s why we do whatever we can to prevent them from killing innocent people. And for that, we should NEVER apologize. Good Lord, critics… buck up or stay in the truck. And if you love freedom, thank our troops!

But she’s ignoring these condemnations at her peril:

In, “No, Sarah Palin, Baptism Isn’t A Good Punchline For A Terrorist Joke,” Mollie Hemingway at The Federalist calls Palin’s comment “blasphemous ” and writes that water boarding “doesn’t hold a candle to the power of the Christian baptism, as historically understood. Does it deliver those who are subjected to it from the devil, as Christian baptism does? Does it give them eternal life, as Christian baptism does? Is it voluntary, as Christian baptism is? It is none of these things.”

Hemingway adds:

Mary Moerbe, a diaconal writer at the Cranach Institute, notes, “Sarah Palin’s brash words portray herself to be a great and powerful baptizer, not bringing faith or the forgiveness of Jesus—or even the sympathy implicit in secular uses of ‘baptism by fire’—but crossing the line into government aggression, specifically against those already subdued and captive. She merged government with religion in one of the worst possible ways: by making herself judge and arbiter.”

Well-known religion writer Rod Dreher at The American Conservative:

Hey world, Sarah Palin believes those “good plans” that God has for us, that holy “destiny,” can include torturing other human beings. And she’s not apologizing for it. At the very best, torture might be a tragic necessity — I don’t think so, but I’m trying to think about it from the other side — but Palin and her audience don’t think so. They laugh at it and cheer for it. This is decadence.

There’s Joe Carter at The Gospel Coalition:

For anyone to confess Christ as their savior and to compare one of the means of God’s grace to a reprehensible act of torture is reprehensible. I hope members of Gov. Palin’s local church will explain to her why her remarks denigrate the Christian faith. Such remarks bring shame on the Body of Christ and to our witness in the world. Even more shameful, however, is the fact that so many Christians would cheer her support of torture (and yes, waterboarding is torture).

Gov. Palin was attempting to appeal to the basest political populism (nothing in her remarks could be construed as genuinely conservative) by claiming that current U.S. counterterrorism policy is overly-tolerant and empathetic toward our enemies. She contends that proper policies would “put the fear of God into our enemies.”

Unfortunately, what Palin is proposing is a mixture of pagan ethics and civil deistic religion.

And Hollis Phelps at Religion Dispatches writes that the “equation of torture and baptism manages to come off as offensive to Christians, as well. As a sacrament to many Christians, baptism signifies regeneration, the rebirth of the individual as ‘a new creature’ in Christ.”

Sarah Palin has lost her Christian conservative base. Her “baptism by waterboarding” speech is almost as damaging (more?) than her “blood libel” video that ended any chance of America seeing a President Palin.