Connect with us

Special Report: Philippines National Police Undergo LGBT Sensitivity Workshops — Part I

Published

on

Last month, as part of the partnership forged by the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) and LADLAD LGBT Party, members of the Philippines National Police went through LGBT sensitivity training, called “Gender, Sexuality and Human Rights workshops.”

In this two-part series, facilitators of the workshops share their experiences and reflect on the program.

PART ONE — WANTED: ROOM for RESPECT
By Ging Cristobal, Project Coordinator, Asia Region, International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission.

In 2003 the recommendations in the documentation report of the Lesbian Advocates Philippines (LeAP!), Unmasked: Faces of Discrimination Against Lesbian in the Philippines, engagement with key stakeholders, in mainstreaming SOGI issues, was one of the top priorities.

Fast forward to 2013, exactly ten years since that report was published, where I was one of the researcher-writer, and together with Raymond Alikpala we have facilitated five workshops in key cities in Metro Manila and a lecture with the Philippines National Police (PNP) Human Rights Affairs Officers stationed in police precincts all over the Philippines. After the first well received workshop in Caloocan City, General Ernesto Fajura, PNP Human Rights Affairs Office (HRAO) Director was swarmed with requests from other precincts to repeat the workshop for their police officers. With the directive from the Chief of Police, the plan to conduct 6 workshops became sixteen, ensuring that all precincts in all the cities in Metro Manila will have the opportunity to participate in the workshop before we go to the provinces in the Philippines. And as what Angie Umbac, then project manager of LeAP!’s documentation report and present president of Rainbow Rights Project (R-Rights), Philippines, messaged me, “Remember how hard it was to engage with PNP? Finally here it is!”

Ten years was long time coming. Over those years LGBT activists and groups have born witness to growing reports of police harassment and extortion of gay men during gay bar raids, transgender women complaining of police harassment and physical and verbal abuse, and lesbians being arrested and charged with kidnapping even if the supposed kidnapped victim is of legal age. As the list against the police officers grew longer and efforts to address this police discrimination and abuse were few, the animosity towards the police force also grew. No one can blame me if I jumped on the chance to engage with the PNP and have the close encounter I have been waiting for all these years.

0 (800×600)For years I have been doing workshops on issues of Sexual Orientation/ Gender Identity (SOGI) and human rights to varied audiences and have witnessed and heard revelations from people after each session: A woman counselor having a hard time maintaining her closeted life, parents struggling to break free from religion-induced hatred towards their gay son, people having a hard time getting used to calling me “ma’am” instead of “sir”, and cold, dagger looks from participants before the workshop were the usual expected reaction. But being in a roomful of police officers was new for me, it was exciting and challenging to make them do and say things they never thought doing nor saying while in uniform with other police officers and even with police officials.

It’s easy for someone to conduct a lecture to provide basic information to learn about SOGI issues and LGBT rights. However, while this provides information about what the LGBT community needs it does not challenge the discriminative and patriarchal attitudes and behaviors people have valued and believed in for most of their lives. Our whole day workshop aims to challenge people to let go of their prejudices and fears and try to provide space in their hearts for respect for people they find different from them.

It takes heart and a gut of steel to endure hurtful revelations, maintain objectivity, and look beyond all these. The 5 workshop modules consist of interactive discussions from morning till early evening. This means a full day filled with patience, maturity and understanding to provide a safe space to teach and at the same time endure hearing people express their prejudices (“homosexual couples cannot form families”), to ask even the most absurd, bigoted and sometimes funny questions (how do you know if you haven’t had sex with the opposite sex?) and express their innermost homophobia and transphobia (I hate people like you!).

The workshop’s highlight is the session in the afternoon where speakers from the LGBT human rights community share stories of their lives with the police officers; letting them take a peek to our common journey of self-discovery, self-denial, self-acceptance, hardships from the pain and abuse, and how we celebrate pride from our small successes as we hold on to our rainbow-colored dreams. You can see how intensely the participants listen and take notes, hear a deep sigh, see heads shaking left to right showing their disapproval how LGBT persons are treated harshly, and uncontrolled comments like:

skitched-20130601-201919“I admire your courage to persist.”

“I was angry towards the two of you when I saw you and learned that you were our facilitators. But now I am filled with respect because I understand your issues.”
Human Rights Desk Officer from Davao City

“I admit I was bias against LGBT persons, when I saw you it’s automatic – I reject you. But now it has changed into acceptance. I am sorry I was that before and from now on I will be fair in doing my job as a police officer.”
Police officer from Bicol

Nothing can equal the satisfaction I get to feel and hear people realize and see LGBT people beyond sexual orientation and gender identity and just see us as ordinary people with dreams and hardships no different from any human being, and appreciate how we struggle to live ordinary lives amidst the abuses, discrimination and, hatred. We broke the ice with these police officers and there is still so much work that needs to be done but hopefully it will be easier knowing that there are people out there who realized and decided that we deserve that little room for respect.

 

READ PART TWO – Conducting LGBT Sensitivity Workshops For The Philippines National Police

 

Images by Raymond Alikpala. Top: LGBT sexuality training for police officers at Camp Karingal in Quezon City. Thanks to PNP HRAO Chief Gen. Nestor M. Fajura, Ging Cristobal, Adri Pangilinan and Ladlad Partylist.


Room for Respect Ging .docx - Google DriveGuest author Ging Cristobal (image, left; and middle image, standing,) adds the above are “reflections during my engagement as facilitator during the series of Gender, Sexuality and Human Rights workshops conducted to police officers of the Philippines National Police (PNP) as part of the partnership forged by the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) and LADLAD LGBT Party.  

“As part of IGLHRC’s work in engaging in human rights advocacy with partners around the globe and in strengthening the capacity of LGBT human rights activists, we assist local groups by sharing facilitation skills and knowledge and acting as a link for LGBT groups to meet and forge partnerships with government agencies.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

Election Denialism Embraced by ‘Large Proportion’ of Trump’s Followers: Report

Published

on

Since at least 2012 Donald Trump has been engaging in election denialism. Now, a tenet of the Republican Party, the refusal to accept official election results they don’t like is ingrained in a large number of his followers.

“I think that the powers that be on the Democratic side have figured out a way to circumvent democracy,” Darlene Anastas, 69, of Middleborough, Massachusetts, told NBC News. The network “spoke to more than 50 Trump supporters, most of whom said they don’t believe Biden can win legitimately in November.”

Poll after poll,” NBC also reported, “has found that a large proportion of the Republican electorate believes the only reasons Joe Biden is president are voter fraud and Democratic dirty tricks, buying into former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims about the 2020 election.”

NBC spoke with 72-year old George Crosby, from Fitzwilliam, New Hampshire, who said, Democrats “cheat like crazy” (video below).

READ MORE: ‘No Place for Antisemitism’: Biden Denounces Violent Campus Protests, Hate Speech and Racism

“I think they cheated before, and I think they’re going to try to do it again, because they’re a bunch of communists,” Fitzwilliam added.

38-year old James Russon of Eagle Mountain, Utah told NBC, “There’s no way Biden could legally … win without unfair means.”

“He added that the only way Biden could prevail would be through ‘cheating’ or ‘a lot of deceased people voting.'”

62-year old Randall Minicola of Las Vegas said it would be “impossible” for Biden to win. “I don’t think he’s got a following. I mean, you look who’s behind him — the only thing he’s got is ghosts behind him. That’s what I believe. Where’s the supporters then? Are they in the basement with him? I don’t think so.”

NBC News did not report on where these particular GOP voters got their information or how they came to believe these claims, but it did note the “possibility of another election in which large numbers of Republicans refuse to accept a Biden victory has also been stoked by influential conservatives.”

READ MORE: Trump Would Not Oppose State Pregnancy Surveillance or Abortion Prosecution

Trump’s election denialism is so strong that in 2020 CNN published “A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses.”

Election denialism continues to be spread throughout the right.

“A senile man is not going to get elected in the most powerful country in the world unless there’s fraud,” former Fox News host Tucker Carlson said in March, NBC noted. Carlson, a purveyor of conspiracy theories, has spoken very positively about Russia and its authoritarian president, Vladimir Putin, and against Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Numerous studies and fact checks have found mail-in voting to be safe and secure, with little opportunity for fraud, yet just last week Carlson, like Trump, was claiming massive election fraud. Undermining Americans’ faith in democracy was a main goal of Russian President Putin’s 2016 attack on the U.S. elections, according to a 2017 report issued by a group of U.S. Intelligence agencies.

But just last week Carlson claimed, “About one in five mail-in ballots in the last election was fraudulent, handing Biden the presidency. We know this because the people who committed the fraud have admitted it in a new poll.”

A portion of NBC’s report from Thursday also appears in this January 2024 NBC News video.

Watch the video below or at this link.

READ MORE: DeSantis Declares NYC ‘Reeks’ of Pot Amid Florida’s Battle for Legalization and 2024 Voters

 

Continue Reading

News

Trump Won’t Commit to Accepting Election Results if He Doesn’t Win State He Falsely Claims He Won

Published

on

Falsely claiming he won the state of Wisconsin in the 2020 presidential election Donald Trump is now refusing to commit to accepting the 2024 results for the Badger State this November.

In an interview with Wisconsin’s Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Trump appeared to dance around the issue, declaring he would only accept the official results “if everything’s honest.”

“If everything’s honest, I’d gladly accept the results,” Trump told the paper’s Alison Dirr and Molly Beck in an interview Wednesday. “If it’s not, you have to fight for the right of the country.”

“But if everything’s honest, which we anticipate it will be — a lot of changes have been made over the last few years — but if everything’s honest, I will absolutely accept the results,” he said.

The Journal Sentinel reports Trump “offered similar conditions when asked the same question by news outlets in 2016 and 2020.”

READ MORE: ‘No Place for Antisemitism’: Biden Denounces Violent Campus Protests, Hate Speech and Racism

“I’d be doing a disservice to the country if I said otherwise,” he said.

In that interview Trump once again falsely claimed he won Wisconsin in 2020, a state President Joe Biden actually won by more than 20,000 votes.

“If you go back and look at all of the things that had been found out, it showed that I won the election in Wisconsin,” Trump told the newspaper. “It also showed I won the election in other locations.”

Trump’s “Big Lie,” that the 2020 election was “rigged” against him, along with his support for the January 6, 2021 insurrection, have been central to his 2024 campaign.

“Trump’s refusal to accept the results of the last presidential election in Wisconsin and his new comments placing conditions on when he would accept the results of the next election come as Republicans are seeking to persuade GOP voters to restore their trust in the state’s system of elections and embrace absentee voting,” the Journal Sentinel reported. “There’s no evidence to support that Wisconsin’s election was tainted by cheating or fraud in 2020. The results have been confirmed by recounts in Dane and Milwaukee counties that Trump paid for, court rulings, a nonpartisan state audit and a study by the conservative legal firm Wisconsin Institute of Law & Liberty, among other analyses.”

READ MORE: Noem Insists 14 Month Old Dog She Shot Was ‘Not a Puppy’ Sparking New Backlash

In October of 2016, weeks before Election Day, during the final presidential debate, Trump was asked if he would make the commitment “that you will absolutely accept the results of this election?”

“I will look at it at the time,” Trump replied. “I’m not looking at anything now, I’ll look at it at the time.”

He then went on to sow doubt about the credibility of the election.

Trump’s refusal to accept election results stretches back more than a decade, even before he ran for president.

After he refused to accept his loss in 2020, ABC News reported “Trump has longstanding history of calling elections ‘rigged’ if he doesn’t like the results.”

“On election night in 2012, when President Barack Obama was reelected, Trump said that the election was a ‘total sham’ and a ‘travesty,’ while also making the claim that the United States is ‘not a democracy’ after Obama secured his victory.

“We can’t let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!” Trump wrote on Twitter

One month later, in December of 2012, Trump tweeted, “The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy.” Ironically, four years later he became president after losing the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, but winning the Electoral College.

Watch the video above or at this link.

READ MORE: ‘Antisemitism Is Wrong, But’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Pilloried for Promoting Antisemitic Claim

Continue Reading

News

‘No Place for Antisemitism’: Biden Denounces Violent Campus Protests, Hate Speech and Racism

Published

on

President Joe Biden made rare, unscheduled remarks from the White House Thursday morning, denouncing the recent violent protests on college campuses, and telling Americans there is “no place” for antisemitism anywhere across the nation. He also denounced “hate speech” and “racism,” while declaring his support for the right to peacefully protest.

“There should be no place on any campus, no place in America for antisemitism or threats of violence against Jewish students,” President Biden declared. “There is no place for hate speech, or violence of any kind, whether it’s antisemitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans. It’s simply wrong. There’s no place for racism in America. It’s all wrong. It’s un-American.”

“Violent protest is not protected,” Biden said strongly. “Peaceful protest is.”

Stressing “the right to free speech,” and the people’s right “to peacefully assemble and make their voices heard,” President Biden also declared the importance of “the rule of law.”

READ MORE: Noem Insists 14 Month Old Dog She Shot Was ‘Not a Puppy’ Sparking New Backlash

“We are not an authoritarian nation where we silence people or squash dissent,” the President also said, praising the ideal of peaceful protests, which he said are in the “best tradition of how Americans respond to consequential issues.”

“But,” he added, “neither are we a lawless country. We are a civil society and order must prevail.”

America is a “big, diverse, free thinking and freedom-loving nation,” Biden said, denouncing those “who rush in to score political points.”

“This isn’t a moment for politics, it’s a moment for clarity.”

“It’s against the law when violence occurs. Destroying property is not a peaceful protest. It’s against the law. Vandalism, trespassing, breaking windows, shutting down campuses, forcing the cancellation of classes and graduations. None of this is a peaceful protest,” he warned. “Threatening people, intimidating people. instilling fear in people is not peaceful protest. It’s against the law. Dissent is essential to democracy but dissent must never lead to disorder or to denying the rights of others so students can finish a semester and their college education.”

READ MORE: ‘Antisemitism Is Wrong, But’: Marjorie Taylor Greene Pilloried for Promoting Antisemitic Claim

“Look. It’s basically a matter of fairness. It’s a matter of what’s right. There’s the right to protest, but not the right to cause chaos. People have the right to get an education, the right to get a degree, the right to walk across the campus safely without fear of being attacked.”

“I understand people have strong feelings and deep convictions in America. We respect the right and protect the right for them to express that. But it doesn’t mean anything goes. It needs to be done without violence. Without destruction, without hate, and within the law. And I’ll make no mistake. As President, I will always defend free speech. And I will always be just as strong standing up for the rule of law. That’s my responsibility to you the American people. My obligation to the Constitution.”

The President also responded to reporters’ questions, including saying he saw no need to call up the National Guard.

Watch the videos above or at this link.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.