X

Prop 8 The Decision: The Highlights, The Best, Most Important Parts!

Here are some quotes from Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision today overturning Prop 8. Revel in the words. Think about how his words make you feel…

You can read the entire decision in full, here: Prop 8 Final Decision.

Read Prop 8 Is Dead!

(It’s important to note that no stay on this decision has been made, meaning that, technically, the ruling is valid immediately. However, it is equally important to know that an appeal has been filed, and it makes sense to assume there are more steps in the way of same-sex marriage in California.)

(Emphasis below mine.)

CONCLUSION

Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in
singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license. Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite- sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. Because California has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians, and because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.

REMEDIES

Plaintiffs have demonstrated by overwhelming evidence  that Proposition 8 violates their due process and equal protection rights and that they will continue to suffer these constitutional  violations until state officials cease enforcement of Proposition 8. California is able to issue marriage licenses to same-sex  couples, as it has already issued 18,000 marriage licenses to same-sex couples and has not suffered any demonstrated harm as a result,  see FF 64-66; moreover, California officials have chosen not to defend Proposition 8 in these proceedings.

Because Proposition 8 is unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses, the court orders entry of judgment permanently enjoining its enforcement; prohibiting the official defendants from applying or enforcing Proposition 8 and directing the official defendants that all persons under their control or supervision shall not apply or enforce Proposition 8.

###

Moral disapproval alone is an improper basis on which to deny rights to gay men and lesbians. The evidence shows conclusively that Proposition 8 enacts, without reason, a private moral view that same-sex couples are inferior to opposite-sex couples. FF 76, 79-80; Romer, 517 US at 634 (“[L]aws of the kind now before us raise the inevitable inference that the disadvantage imposed is born of animosity toward the class of persons affected.”). Because Proposition 8 disadvantages gays and lesbians without any rational justification, Proposition 8 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Related Post