Prop 8’s “High Tech Gays”
In today’s closing arguments of Perry v. Schwarzenegger, there was a fair amount of reference to “High Tech Gays.” While I’m not a lawyer, I’m pretty good with the Google machine. Here’s what I found:
In last year’s trial brief of the Prop 8 Proponents (anti-marriage equality folks) they reference a case known as “High Tech Gays v. Defense Indus. Sec. Clearance Office.” The brief reads,
“To the extent Proposition 8 draws a distinction based on sexual orientation, it is subject only to rational basis review under the Equal Protection Clause. Like every other federal court of appeals to address the issue, the Ninth Circuit has squarely held that “homosexuals do not constitute a suspect or quasi-suspect class entitled to greater than rational basis scrutiny.†E.g., High Tech Gays v. Defense Indus. Sec. Clearance Office, 895 F.2d 563, 574 (9th Cir. 1990). Specifically, it has held that suspect or quasi-suspect classification requires a showing that a group (1) has suffered a history of discrimination, (2) is defined by an immutable characteristic, and (3) is politically powerless, and that gays and lesbians do not satisfy the second and third requirements.”
(emphasis added)
So, the defendants are arguing that gays (high tech or not) are not a “suspect class,” a group subject to discrimination.
Um, OK… Guess they never went to high school…
Oh, and “High Tech Gays?” It “was a social organization that met in San Jose from 1984 thru 1997. The organization was disbanded in the spring of 1998.”
“High Tech Gays v. Defense Indus. Sec. Clearance Office” was a case that found that “established that homosexuals were a definable minority.”
Hope that gives you a little bit more insight.
By the way, “High Tech Gays” does have, of course, a Facebook page.
By definition or any other form of scrutiny, I am proud to be a “High Tech Gay.”
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.