Connect with us

Junk Science: Dr. Keith Ablow, Tony Perkins Spread Anti-Gay Hate On Fox



Dr. Keith Ablow and Tony Perkins discussed President Obama‘s support for same-sex marriage, the institution of marriage, and adoption of children by same-sex couples as they spread falsehoods, hate, fear, and lies in a segment on Fox News hosted by Lou Dobbs.

Dr. Ablow, who spent a great deal of time recently spreading fear and hate about Chaz Bono and transgender people, falsely stated that same-sex couples who adopt children don’t do it to care for others. “This is narcissistic,” Ablow claimed.

“How did we decide that kids are just fine to grow up absent their biological parent,” Ablow proclaimed. “Three people can love each other so polygamy has to be close behind” the advent of same-sex marriage. “How can you have same-sex marriage and not believe three people can fall in love, which they absolutely can?”

Ablow is confusing issues, ignoring peer-reviewed studies, and fear-mongering. That he is able to do it with a “Dr.” in front of his name on national television is astonishing.

At any given moment in America, there are 2.9 million children who are homeless. Millions more are living in temporary situations without either of their biological parents. Study after study proves that children raised by same-sex couples are at least as successful in school and at least as well-adjusted as their peers raised by heterosexual parents.

Same-sex couples often adopt, alleviating some of this tragedy.

Dr. Keith Ablow is ignorant –willfully or not — of all these facts.

Tony Perkins, the head of the certified anti-gay hate group, Family Research Council, citing junk science, claims, “$112 billion a year the result of the demise of the family.” False.

And if it were true, Perkins should be then jumping on all same-sex couples, begging us to marry and adopt, right? Wouldn’t that make sense if Perkins were concerned about children?

“You cannot devalue the role of a mom and a dad and not impact the life of a child and as a result the social costs that are associated with it.”

In Tony Perkins’ world, facts are irrelevant.

In Tony Perkins world, every child has a mom and a dad and gay couples merely are attempting to rip part these intact Ozzie and Harriet, Father Knows Best, Leave It To Beaver homes to steal their children and raise them in Godless same-sex couple-headed households.

Or,  in Tony Perkins’ world, same-sex couples are creating children and subjecting them to horrors unimaginable.

Neither of which is true.

Perkins says that “This is an experiment we don’t want to have.” Well, Tony, this is an “experiment” we are having — presidential support or not. LGBT people, much to your chagrin, exist. We will continue to enter into relationships, and yes, marriage, and we will continue to create and raise families and there’s nothing you can do to stop it.

And shame on you, and Dr. Keith Ablow, for trying.

Ironically, Fox’s Lou Dobbs (and Shepard Smith) have publicly endorsed same-sex marriage but you’d never know it from this segment.



Watch the latest video at <a href=””></a>Related:


Ablow: Transgender People Are Just Like Heroin Addicts And Anorexics

Chaz Bono Shows Fox Who’s Boss: “We Are Boycotting Fox”

Keith Ablow Gets Slammed By Psychologist For Chaz Bono Column – Twice

Dr. Keith Ablow’s Fox News Piece On Chaz Bono? Don’t Let Your Kids Read It!


Tony Perkins’ Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day

CNN Hosts Hate Group Leader To Explain Obama’s Gay Marriage Support

Tony Perkins’ Kids Won’t Be Gay Because He’s ‘Teaching Them The Right Ways’

Chris Matthews: There’s ‘A Good Argument’ To Ban Tony Perkins From Hardball

Hat tip: Good As You

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.


‘Taking Us All for Fools’: Critics Decimate Greg Abbott’s Claims and Defense of His Actions in Wake of School Shooting



Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott in a press conference that left reporters frustrated defended his actions and insisted his earlier praise for law enforcement’s widely criticized response to the Uvalde school massacre was the result of being “misled.”

“I am livid about what happened,” Abbott declared, blaming others for his “recitation of what people in that room told me.”

Critics aren’t buying his claims.

Abbott, who’s in the middle of a heated re-election campaign, appeared extremely defensive when reporters asked him questions.

“Let’s be clear about one thing. None of the laws I signed this past session had any intersection with this crime at all,” Abbott told reporters when asked if he would call the legislature back for a special session, as The Texas Tribune’s Sewell Chan noted.

“No law that I signed allowed him to get a gun,” Abbott insisted.

“The answers fell pretty flat,” opined MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, who noted the press event lasted just 36 minutes, less time than the police officers “stood outside and did nothing,” which was 47 minutes.

Abbott ended the press conference with many reporters almost begging him to take more questions. As the governor got up and left one frustrated reporter was caught on a hot mic saying “unbelievable.”

Chan, who is the editor in chief of the Tribune, added on Twitter: “Abbott rejects background checks as a simplistic and ineffective fix. Wouldn’t have prevented Sutherland Springs and Santa Fe shootings, he says. Tries to turn focus to broken mental health system.”

Former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence Frank Figliuzzi on MSNBC delivered a strong rebuke to Governor Abbott’s remarks.

“No amount of free flights, no amount of free caskets, no amount of mental health counseling is going to bring back any one of those murdered children,” Figliuzzi said, referring to Abbott’s announcement an anonymous donor is putting up  $175,000 for funeral expenses of those who were murdered in the shooting and said the state will pay for mental health treatment.

Abbott also insisted that since Texas became a state it’s been legal for 18-year-olds to buy long guns.

Fred Guttenberg, whose daughter Jaime was murdered in the Parkland school shooting, blasted Abbott:

And long guns of today, as Figliuzzi noted, are often semi-automatic “killing machines.”

“The governor seems completely unable to understand that he can easily make a distinction when you’re talking about whether an 18-year-old should buy an assault rifle or not. And all he cares about is a century of history in Texas on long guns. We didn’t have the AR-15 style assault weapons back then.  He can easily make a distinction and say, ‘you can go hunting, here are the rifles you can do, you can buy, you can possess – and here’s an assault-style rifle.'”

“If he thinks that people are stupid and unable to understand that there is a clear distinction between a killing machine and a hunting rifle, that he’s taking us all for fools.”


Continue Reading


‘I Apologize for Interrupting Your Press Conference’: Tearful Texas Democrat Urges Greg Abbott to ‘Do Something’ on Guns



The Texas Democratic State Senator who represents Uvalde stood up during Greg Abbott’s Friday afternoon press conference and almost begged the Republican Governor to “do something” about gun violence after Tuesday’s massacre at Robb Elementary School that took 21 lives.

Abbott was trying to place the blame for the school shooting on mental health despite the gunman having no documented issues, and told attendees, “we’re focusing our attention on the wrong thing.”

That was not good enough for Democratic State Senator Roland Gutierrez, who politely introduced himself and said, “I’m not making a political speech.”

“My colleagues are asking for a special session, you’re getting a letter tomorrow,” from the Senate Democratic Caucus.

“We’ve asked for gun control changes – I’m asking you now, bring us back in three weeks.”

Gutierrez grew emotional, sounding as if he was choking up, and added, “I apologize for interrupting your press conference about the needs of this community. I’ve been here for three days with all of these elected officials – this county judge has been working his ass off,” he continued.

“I don’t know how to express the loss of the families that I’ve talked to,” he added.

“You have to do something, man,” Gutierrez said, all but begging the governor to take action, and saying his “own colleagues are calling me and telling me this is enough.”


Continue Reading


Watch: Right Wing Host at NRA Convention Likens 18 Year Olds Buying Guns to 3rd Graders Deciding Gender



A host from a right-wing streaming service covering the NRA convention in Houston decided to compare conservatives’ growing active opposition to the rights and existence of transgender people, to the majority of Americans demanding expanded gun control legislation.

“We are being told by the left that a third-grader has the knowledge to determine if they were born a boy or they were born a girl, whether or not they want to stay that gender that they were born with,” said Brian Glenn, Right Side Broadcasting’s director of programming and correspondent.

“And if we feel like at a third grade you can make decisions on your gender, then I think by the time you’re 18 you should have enough maturity – assuming you’re not a complete psychopath – to buy a handgun and exercise your Second Amendment.”

Of course, that hypothetical third-grader is harming exactly no one and later can reverse that decision if they choose, which the vast majority do not.

That hypothetical 18-year old, or, in the case of this week’s horrific tragedy, an actual 18-year old, buying two AR-15 style assault weapons and hundreds of rounds of ammunition within three days of their 18th birthday, gunning down 21 people including 19 elementary school children, cannot reverse any of those decisions.



Continue Reading


Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.