Connect with us

Gay-Basher Chuck Colson: “I Can’t Think of A Single Time” I’ve Gay Bashed

Published

on

Chuck Colson, who calls legal same-sex marriages “so-called marriages,” is sadden to learn he made the GLAAD list of 36 anti-gay pundits they will be tracking and holding accountable. Colson best-known as a Watergate felon turned prison minister, is also one of the triumvirate  — along with NOM, National Organization For Marriage founder Robert George – who drafted the virulently anti-gay “Manhattan Declaration.” And last year he also wrote, “‘gay marriage’ will inevitably undermine all marriages.” But amusingly, Colson today writes that he is in fact no gay-basher: “Over the years I have been very careful not to engage in gay-bashing. I can’t think of a single time I have.”

Colson calls the list’s existence — and the entire GLAAD Commentator Accountability Project (CAP)  — “intimidation,” and labels it “par for the course for many in the so-called gay-rights movement.”

Not interested in dialogue, they seem more interested in demonizing and shouting down their opponents.

For another, their definition of “gay bashing” is skewed. For them, anything short of renouncing the historical Christian teaching on sexuality is akin to hate. If I say that homosexual sex is a sin, they say I’m hateful.

Yes, that’s right. You are. How would you like to be denied your marriage?

Because, Mr. Colson, you seek to deny us the right to marriage, yet say “homosexual sex is a sin,” just as “pre-marital sex is a sin.”

You — and your ilk — demand we never be afforded the joys and responsibilities of marriage, nor those of sex. How is that not gay-bashing, but gay-affirming?

Colson continues:

I seek to honestly discuss the issues. So if any reporter has evidence of gay bashing on my part, I’d like to hear it. But again, I reject the notion that disagreement – even strong disagreement – is gay bashing or hateful.

I can’t speak for the others on this latest list, but I for one, will not be intimidated into silence. No matter what list I make!

It’s amazing that the GLAAD project has had such an effect on those who would seek to not only silence the LGBT community, but imprison or even put us to death. Yes, it’s unfair to hold accountable each individual for statements the others have made, but it hopefully irks a few that they’re on the same list as Bryan Fischer, who says gays are Nazis and would see us jailed.

That’s the funny thing about lists. Take the SPLC updated list that now holds 27 anti-gay hate groups, and the larger list of all hate groups that has blossomed into over 1000.

I wonder if Fischer is irked he’s on the same list as the KKK?

But back to our friend Chuck Colson.

Eric Ethington at Pride In Utah one year ago this month wrote:

Rabid extremist Chuck Colson has just released a video condemning GSA’s (Gay Straight Alliances) in Utah, saying that they are indoctrinating kids to rape others just like in prison.

But, Colson is no gay-basher, right?

Here’s the video:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=oyyt7uDht1Y%3Fversion%3D3%26hl%3Den_US

Heck, in 2008, after winning the Prop 8 battle, you actually signed the disgusting full page ad in the New York Times titled, “No Mob Veto.”

Here’s a copy:

(For more on the lies-filled No Mob Veto ad, read Wayne Besens’ excellent op-ed in the Huffington Post.)

Mr. Colson, you asked, so I’m answering.

Yes, you and your ilk who call us sinners, who seek to deprive us of the very rights you were afforded upon your birth, yes, you are gay bashers. It’s not a particularly nice name to call someone, but what you’ve done to earn it far outweighs the label.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘Taking Us All for Fools’: Critics Decimate Greg Abbott’s Claims and Defense of His Actions in Wake of School Shooting

Published

on

Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott in a press conference that left reporters frustrated defended his actions and insisted his earlier praise for law enforcement’s widely criticized response to the Uvalde school massacre was the result of being “misled.”

“I am livid about what happened,” Abbott declared, blaming others for his “recitation of what people in that room told me.”

Critics aren’t buying his claims.

Abbott, who’s in the middle of a heated re-election campaign, appeared extremely defensive when reporters asked him questions.

“Let’s be clear about one thing. None of the laws I signed this past session had any intersection with this crime at all,” Abbott told reporters when asked if he would call the legislature back for a special session, as The Texas Tribune’s Sewell Chan noted.

“No law that I signed allowed him to get a gun,” Abbott insisted.

“The answers fell pretty flat,” opined MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace, who noted the press event lasted just 36 minutes, less time than the police officers “stood outside and did nothing,” which was 47 minutes.

Abbott ended the press conference with many reporters almost begging him to take more questions. As the governor got up and left one frustrated reporter was caught on a hot mic saying “unbelievable.”

Chan, who is the editor in chief of the Tribune, added on Twitter: “Abbott rejects background checks as a simplistic and ineffective fix. Wouldn’t have prevented Sutherland Springs and Santa Fe shootings, he says. Tries to turn focus to broken mental health system.”

Former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence Frank Figliuzzi on MSNBC delivered a strong rebuke to Governor Abbott’s remarks.

“No amount of free flights, no amount of free caskets, no amount of mental health counseling is going to bring back any one of those murdered children,” Figliuzzi said, referring to Abbott’s announcement an anonymous donor is putting up  $175,000 for funeral expenses of those who were murdered in the shooting and said the state will pay for mental health treatment.

Abbott also insisted that since Texas became a state it’s been legal for 18-year-olds to buy long guns.

Fred Guttenberg, whose daughter Jaime was murdered in the Parkland school shooting, blasted Abbott:

And long guns of today, as Figliuzzi noted, are often semi-automatic “killing machines.”

“The governor seems completely unable to understand that he can easily make a distinction when you’re talking about whether an 18-year-old should buy an assault rifle or not. And all he cares about is a century of history in Texas on long guns. We didn’t have the AR-15 style assault weapons back then.  He can easily make a distinction and say, ‘you can go hunting, here are the rifles you can do, you can buy, you can possess – and here’s an assault-style rifle.'”

“If he thinks that people are stupid and unable to understand that there is a clear distinction between a killing machine and a hunting rifle, that he’s taking us all for fools.”

 

Continue Reading

News

‘I Apologize for Interrupting Your Press Conference’: Tearful Texas Democrat Urges Greg Abbott to ‘Do Something’ on Guns

Published

on

The Texas Democratic State Senator who represents Uvalde stood up during Greg Abbott’s Friday afternoon press conference and almost begged the Republican Governor to “do something” about gun violence after Tuesday’s massacre at Robb Elementary School that took 21 lives.

Abbott was trying to place the blame for the school shooting on mental health despite the gunman having no documented issues, and told attendees, “we’re focusing our attention on the wrong thing.”

That was not good enough for Democratic State Senator Roland Gutierrez, who politely introduced himself and said, “I’m not making a political speech.”

“My colleagues are asking for a special session, you’re getting a letter tomorrow,” from the Senate Democratic Caucus.

“We’ve asked for gun control changes – I’m asking you now, bring us back in three weeks.”

Gutierrez grew emotional, sounding as if he was choking up, and added, “I apologize for interrupting your press conference about the needs of this community. I’ve been here for three days with all of these elected officials – this county judge has been working his ass off,” he continued.

“I don’t know how to express the loss of the families that I’ve talked to,” he added.

“You have to do something, man,” Gutierrez said, all but begging the governor to take action, and saying his “own colleagues are calling me and telling me this is enough.”

Watch:

Continue Reading

RIGHT WING EXTREMISM

Watch: Right Wing Host at NRA Convention Likens 18 Year Olds Buying Guns to 3rd Graders Deciding Gender

Published

on

A host from a right-wing streaming service covering the NRA convention in Houston decided to compare conservatives’ growing active opposition to the rights and existence of transgender people, to the majority of Americans demanding expanded gun control legislation.

“We are being told by the left that a third-grader has the knowledge to determine if they were born a boy or they were born a girl, whether or not they want to stay that gender that they were born with,” said Brian Glenn, Right Side Broadcasting’s director of programming and correspondent.

“And if we feel like at a third grade you can make decisions on your gender, then I think by the time you’re 18 you should have enough maturity – assuming you’re not a complete psychopath – to buy a handgun and exercise your Second Amendment.”

Of course, that hypothetical third-grader is harming exactly no one and later can reverse that decision if they choose, which the vast majority do not.

That hypothetical 18-year old, or, in the case of this week’s horrific tragedy, an actual 18-year old, buying two AR-15 style assault weapons and hundreds of rounds of ammunition within three days of their 18th birthday, gunning down 21 people including 19 elementary school children, cannot reverse any of those decisions.

Watch:

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.