Connect with us

Fox’s Megyn Kelly Uses Real Science To Support Same-Sex Parents And Eviscerate Fox Male Pundits

Published

on

Fox News host Megyn Kelly took fellow host Lou Dobbs and Fox contributor Erick Erickson to task for their anti-women, anti-gay comments about a Pew poll which found that in 40 percent of U.S. households with children, women are the “breadwinners.”

LOOK: Fox Contributor Goes After Women, Gay Parents: ‘Feminist And Emo Lefties Have Their Panties In A Wad’

“What makes you dominant and me submissive and who died and made you scientist in chief?,” Kelly began, as she took Erickson out to the woodshed for a well-deserved verbal “beating.”

“Now, there is data, in the scientific community, to suggest that children of homosexual couples who are happily married and good parents fare no worse than children of heterosexual couples, and there’s plenty of data to suggest that children of working moms — as opposed to stay-at-hme moms — wind up just as healthy and able to thrive in society than the children of stay-at-home mothers,” Kelly pointed told Erickson.

LOOK: Fox News Host Greta Van Susteren Asks If Her Male Colleagues ‘Have Lost Their Minds?’

Erickson then went on to use the flawed and disgraced Regnerus study as supposed proof of his claims that gay parents are bad parents. Erickson claimed the “left has tried to undermine” the study, not noting that it’s fatally flawed.

Just this week, the Southern Poverty Law Center released an interview with the chief reviewer of the Regnerus study, who called it “deeply flawed” and called Regnerus himself “disgraced.”

Erickson claimed he’s “not judging” families with working moms — to which Kelly interjected: “You are judging them.”

“Megyn, I don’t view it as judging, I view it as a statement of fact,” Erickson responded — which sums up his world view entirely.

“Just because you have people who agree with you doesn’t mean it’s not offensive,” Kelly added.

“I don’t think I’m an ’emo liberal’ and I don’t describe myself as a feminist but I will tell you I was offended by your piece nonetheless. I didn’t like what you wrote one bit and I do think you’re judging people. To me you sound like somebody’s who’s judging but wants to off as ‘I’m not I’m not I’m not, now let me judge judge judge. And by the way it’s science it’s science it’s science it’s fact fact fact.'”

“I have a whole list of studies that say your science is wrong and your facts are wrong.”

Kelly then turned her attention to Dobbs, and slammed him for his comments linking declining marriage rates, increasing divorce rates, and a failed war on drugs to working women. “Why are you attributing that to women in the workforce?,” Kelly demanded to know.

Kelly turned her ire back to Erickson.

“American Psychological Association, 2010 study. According to a review of fifty years of research. ‘Children whose mothers work are no ore likely than children whose mothers stay at home…. Your fact, and your science, Erick, is not supported by the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, Columbia University study, University of North Carolina study — I mean, why are we supposed to take your word for it, Erick Erickson’s science, instead of all these experts?”

Erickson claimed all those studies were “politically motivated.”

“In this country in the ’50s and ’60s there were huge, huge numbers of people that believed that the children of interracial marriages were biologically inferior and that is why it was illegal for blacks and whites to marry in some states in the country up until 1967,” Kelly told Erickson. “And they said it was science and fact if you were the child of a black father and white mother or vice versa you were inferior and you were not set up for success. Tell that to Barack Obama.”

Kelly’s takedown of her two male colleagues was rare, and epic. Kelly has stood up for good American values before on Fox, risking her credibility with their hard right viewership, but this was historic.

You can thank her on Twitter.

Hat tip: Think Progess

There's a reason 10,000 people subscribe to NCRM. You can get the news before it breaks just by subscribing, plus you can learn something new every day.
Continue Reading
Click to comment
 
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

News

‘Unconstitutional Conspiracy’: Judge Blasts Trump Administration Officials

Published

on

A Reagan-appointed federal judge declared that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem had “conspired” to chill First Amendment rights in a case involving pro-Palestinian student protesters.

Senior Judge William Young of the U.S. District Court for Massachusetts, on Thursday said that Rubio and Noem had “failed in their duty to uphold the constitution,” as Politico’s Kyle Cheney reported.

Judge Young’s remarks were reported in real time by journalists covering the proceedings and shared on social media as the hearing unfolded.

“What happened here is an unconstitutional conspiracy to pick off certain people, to twist the laws,” Judge Young said, denouncing the lack of any actual policy. “Two cabinet secretaries conspired … they intentionally, knowing what they were doing, counseled by professionals who cautioned them, nevertheless went ahead to pick off these people with the intention that your clients would be chilled. And did so rather effectively, by the way.”

Judge Young, 85, also invoked President Donald Trump.

“The big problem in this case,” Young said, “is that the cabinet secretaries and ostensibly the president of the United States are not honoring the First Amendment.”

Young, who has served on the bench for over four decades, continued, saying, “let’s talk the truth here,” as he denounced decisions made at DHS that directed professionals to be “taken off anti-terrorist investigations.”

“They were taken off human trafficking investigations all to look up … what dirt they could find on this group … the very highest levels of the DHS decided – that’s the best use of those people.”

He called it “chapter and verse about how the government can be weaponized against a disfavored group.”

According to All Rise News editor-in-chief Adam Klasfeld, Judge Young also slammed President Trump.

“It’s fairly clear that this President believes, as an authoritarian, when he speaks, everyone, everyone, in Article II, is going to toe the line absolutely.”

According to Reuters, Judge Young indicated that he would issue an order presuming immigration actions against the plaintiffs’ members were retaliatory unless the government could prove otherwise in court.

 

Image via Reuters 

Continue Reading

News

‘Take Vitamins’: Johnson and White House Scramble to Keep GOP Members Showing Up

Published

on

With a razor-thin margin, Speaker Mike Johnson is urging House Republicans to show up for work — in D.C., not their district offices — and warning their absences could hamper President Donald Trump’s agenda.

“It’s dicey some days,” Johnson told reporters. “I told everybody … ‘no risk-taking, take vitamins and stay healthy and be here,’” The Washington Post reported.

The White House is also keeping an eye on members’ attendance, and has instructed Republicans to forego appearing with President Trump if there is a House vote scheduled.

“The president does not like it when he hears about members missing votes,” one person close to Trump told the Post.

READ MORE: Trump on 2026 Midterms: ‘We Shouldn’t Even Have an Election’

At risk are bills that cannot be brought to the floor because, as happened this week, Democrats in Washington outnumbered Republicans.

One near-casualty was legislation close to the president’s long-term agenda, which had to be postponed for lack of Republicans. The bill was The Shower Act, which is officially named the “Saving Homeowners from Overregulation With Exceptional Rinsing Act.”

President Trump for years has complained about water pressure regulations, and demanded removal of requirements that lower the amount of water coming out of faucets and showerheads.

Republicans have been down several voting members this month, as the Post reported.

“One Republican missed House votes because of a car crash that left him badly bruised. Another is recovering from brain surgery, while yet another was away from Washington while caring for his wife, who is dealing with a bout of cancer,” the Post noted.

There is also the sudden resignation of U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), and the sudden death of U.S. Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA).

“And then there’s Rep. Wesley Hunt. The two-term Texan lawmaker, who is in a heated GOP primary for Senate, has spent so much time on the campaign trail back home that his missed votes have become a salient issue in the race,” the Post noted.

Hunt’s absence, and that of four other GOP lawmakers, forced Speaker Johnson to pull the Shower Act from a floor vote last week.

This week, it passed.

READ MORE: House Majority Flip Could Trigger Sweeping Probes Into Trump Inner Circle: Democrat

 

Image via Reuters

 

Continue Reading

News

House Majority Flip Could Trigger Sweeping Probes Into Trump Inner Circle: Democrat

Published

on

If Democrats win control of the U.S. House of Representatives in November, multiple investigations into senior Trump administration officials would begin, a Democratic lawmaker said.

“Stephen Miller should lawyer up,” said U.S. Rep. Pat Ryan (D-NY), responding to video of his remarks earlier Thursday.

Congressman Ryan had been speaking with Pablo Manríquez, the editor of Migrant Insider on Substack, who said to the New York Democrat that White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller “seems to be operating sort of as a shadow president at this point.”

“Can you think of any legal liability he could face on the back end of this presidency?” Manríquez asked.

READ MORE: Trump on 2026 Midterms: ‘We Shouldn’t Even Have an Election’

“Well,” Ryan responded, “there’s gonna be legal, and I think criminal liability for multiple members of this administration, certainly including Stephen Miller.”

“They continue to just violate the law, violate the Constitution, violate our moral standing and values as Americans,” he alleged.

Ryan said that Democrats across multiple House committees “are already readying investigations … to be ready on day one, when we retake the majority, when the voice of the people are brought back here to the House.”

Democrats currently appear likely to get that chance.

According to Dave Wasserman of the Cook Political Report on Thursday, “House ratings show Dems as modest favorites for control, as Republicans would need to win two thirds of Toss Ups (67%) to keep the majority.”

Wasserman also noted that eighteen House races had moved in the Democrats’ direction.

READ MORE: ‘Chaos and Crisis’: Trump Sparks Alarm After Ramping Up Insurrection Act Threat

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.