Five Ways The Boy Scout Ban On Gay And Bisexual Adults Hurts Everyone
The Boy Scouts of America’s most unfair, unhealthy policy isolates gay and bisexual Scouts, vilifies them as criminals, teaches bigotry to all Scouts, and hurts society.
Â
The Boy Scouts of America just re-adopted the most unhealthy policy of their 103-year history, a rule which isolates gay and bisexual Scouts, vilifies them in their teens as eventual criminals, teaches bigotry to all Scouts, and hurts society in five specific ways.
During its annual meeting on May 23, 2013, 61 percent of the 1232 National Council members who were present voted for a resolution that revised the 22-year old rule about how gay and bisexual Scouts start, continue, and end their memberships. Whereas the former policy denied or expelled all members who were gay or bisexual (but ignored all who were heterosexual or asexual), the new policy admits all members equally, without regard to sexual orientation — but only until age 18.
At age 18, heterosexual and asexual Scouts can opt to become adult leaders (volunteers or employees), but gay and bisexual Scouts are banned for the rest of their lives.
This lifetime ban hurts younger boys, teens, all of Scouting, and society in five ways.
1. BSA unfairly dooms all gay and bisexual Scouts. The moment that any gay or bisexual Scout reaches age 18, BSA bans him for life from any participation, both as a volunteer and as an employee. There are no exceptions; even the highest-ranked achievers get banned. BSA President Wayne Perry admits that there’s no scientific evidence to justify the rule. In a 62-page brief recently filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, this abject absence of scientific evidence was documented by the overwhelming majority of U.S. health professionals. The rule arises only out of a vile prejudice based on ignorance, fear, and a superstition that LGBT people are defective, sick, incurable, and evil.
2. BSA policy hurts the very Scouts it aims to help. Most children become aware of their sexual orientation at some point, so most gay or bisexual Scouts make that discovery during their Scouting years (ages 7 through 21). But from that moment forward, they face the endless, dark knowledge that in their late teens, regardless of their achievements, the BSA bans them for the rest of their lives. Of the 2.6 million current Scouts, roughly 200,000 boys are — or will be — gay or bisexual. Each one of those boys will spend much of his youth years knowing that his own troop, along with 1,600 other troops, have pre-labeled him — and every other gay or bisexual Scout — as an inevitable, incurable monster. There’s no basis for this false presumption, and it is psychologically damaging for these kids to grow up knowing that they are the only Scouts who are always expelled, are never readmitted, and are assumed to be dangerous.
3. BSA teaches prejudice to all Scouts. BSA’s policy teaches every Scout that all LGBT people aged 18 and over should be feared and avoided, and considered lower than criminals (BSA accepts even convicts who served prison time, but it bans gays, bisexuals, and lesbians). BSA officials have never found any justification for their policy, and they excuse it only with vague mumbling about “standards†and “beliefs†and “religion†— the very same words once used to defend slavery and racial segregation.
4. BSA’s ban ignores medical science. About 70 percent of Scout troop sponsors are faith-based organizations. Most of those sponsors (37 percent are Mormon, 10 percent Methodist, 8 percent Catholic) still teach the religious superstition that among the five sexual orientations (heterosexual, asexual, lesbian, homosexual, bisexual) the first two are holy virtues, while the last three are curable illnesses. Most also preach that people can switch sexual orientations through a better mix of hobbies, sports, attire, grooming, and prayer. But this is junk science, for which there is no peer-reviewed, scientific proof. This “ex-gay†therapy is unaccredited, the treatments aren’t government regulated, the salesmen have no medical degrees, the practitioners aren’t licensed, the clinics can’t get medical malpractice insurance, the products are consumer frauds, and every mainstream professional health organization warns that such efforts are harmful, dangerous, and too often lead to suicide. For children and teens, such products are already being outlawed in three states (California, New Jersey, New York). Nevertheless, many of Scouting’s religious sponsors still sell these cures, and BSA’s ban on LGBT adults is part of their sales pitch.
5. BSA prejudice floods into society at large. The BSA mission is to turn youth into responsible citizens; however, by teaching institutionalized prejudice toward LGBT people, BSA defeats its own goal. A prime example of how prejudice degrades citizenship is that when GOP officials re-wrote their 2012-2015 Republican Party Platform, they vowed to keep banning gay and bisexual youth from Scouting, and to keep banning LGBT adults from volunteering and employment. All such prejudice, even when excused, euphemized, or institutionalized, is still raw bigotry. BSA is still teaching that bigotry to future generations.
It harms gay and bisexual Scouts to teach them that they all will become evil monsters. It hurts other Scouts to remind them of the bigoted policy based on ignorance, superstition, fear, and hatred. It hurts kids outside of Scouting to learn that BSA bans all LGBT adults for no scientific reason. It hurts families when parents are banned from contributing to their own children’s activities. And all of Scouting and society are hurt when each one million volunteers recruited requires rejecting 77,000 qualified applicants — including Eagle Scouts — just because they were banned for life.
One amazing bright spot does emerge from a stark division within the Scouting community: most older adults want to discriminate against LGBT people, but most Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts, Varsity Scouts, Sea Scouts, and Venturers oppose such discrimination. So, it looks like the Boy Scouts themselves will have to teach their adult leaders why the kind of discrimination which is increasingly unlawful in much of civil society also violates the principles of the Scout Oath and the Scout Law. Â For starters, they can point to the Girl Scouts, whose enlightened membership policies are years ahead of the Boy Scouts.
The BSA’s homophobia is unhealthy for everyone, inside and outside of Scouting. It benefits no one. It teaches irrational bias toward all LGBT people, of all ages, everywhere. It is in effect right now. BSA officials have vowed not to change it.
In living up to the Scout Law, gay and bisexual Boy Scouts must be far more “loyal, helpful, kind, and brave†than everyone else, because — for them — fairness in Scouting ends at age 18.
Image via Facebook
Ned Flaherty is an LGBT activist currently focused on civil marriage equality, and previously on Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal. He writes from Boston, Massachusetts, where America’s first same-gender civil marriages began in 2004. He suffered a childhood exposure to Roman Catholic pomp and circumstance, but the spell never took, and he recovered.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
 |
Hard-right groups have expanded their influence inside the Trump administration, a new report on hate and extremism by the Southern Poverty Law Center finds, according to The Guardian. A federal grand jury indicted the SPLC, a civil rights organization, on federal fraud charges earlier this year — months before the report’s publication.
“2025 was a turbulent year marked by injustice, social upheaval and stark new threats from a hard-right movement rapidly establishing its power across institutions,” reads the director’s note to the SPLC’s “2025 Year in Hate and Extremism” series. “The hard right effectively seized the power of government as a messenger for extremist rhetoric and a tool to dictate policies affecting the everyday lives of millions of people.”
The Trump administration “radically” shifted policy to favor the hard-right and extremists, reads the SPLC’s report titled “Empowering Extremists,” which was published Tuesday as part of the series.
The report found that the Trump administration has “shifted the focus of federal law enforcement away from violent crime investigations to sweeping immigration raids through American communities, targeting undocumented people as well as Black and Brown people — often regardless of immigration status and absent any suspicion of a violent offense.”
It states that on Sept. 22, 2025, “Trump issued an overly broad, vague executive order designating ‘antifa’ — a term often applied to people and community-based organizations opposing white supremacy, racism and the far right more generally — as a domestic terrorist organization.”
The Guardian noted that the SPLC report “pointed to conservative influencer Andy Ngo, who told Trump during a roundtable in October that ‘perhaps the state department should designate Antifa … a foreign terrorist organization.'”
“Would you like to see it done?” Trump replied. “You think it would help? I’d be glad to do it. I think it’s the kind of thing I’d like to do. Does everybody agree? If you agree, I agree. Let’s get it done.”
Trump “kept his promise,” the SPLC noted. “In November 2025, the State Department named four left-wing militant groups as foreign terrorist organizations.”
The report stated that the Trump administration’s “law enforcement shifts make Americans less safe,” and its actions increase the “threat posed by far-right extremism.”
“The administration gutted efforts to tackle hard-right extremism and downplayed — and even defended — the threat of right-wing extremist violence,” the report alleges. For example, the DOJ “removed a June 2024 peer-reviewed study from its website that concluded that far-right attacks continue ‘to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism.'”
Image via Reuters
President Donald Trump keeps insisting that gas prices aren’t especially high. What many Americans see at the pump tells a different story, and CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale has the numbers to prove it.
As recently as Tuesday, Trump claimed that the price of gas is “not very high, relatively speaking. I mean, it’s lower than during the Biden administration.”
Trump was not especially specific, but Dale is.
According to AAA, today’s average gas price is $4.16. That is lower than the peak number during the Biden administration, $5.02, which occurred after Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022.
“But the current $4.16 per gallon national average is significantly higher than the national average when Biden left office in January 2025, which was $3.12 per gallon,” Dale explains. “And it’s higher than the national average was on 1,334 of Biden’s 1,460 full days as president, figures provided by AAA show.”
Dale reports that today’s price is higher than the price during 91 percent of the Biden presidency, and higher than any day during his final 29 months.
Today’s price is also “much higher” than it was one year ago: $3.12. It’s higher than on the day Trump launched his attack against Iran: $2.98.
The good news is today’s price is lower than the price from one month ago ($4.53) and lower than last week ($4.29).
Trump has repeatedly promised lower prices once the Iran war ends.
Just last week he told reporters, “when it’s all straightened out, you’re going to have oil prices drop down to maybe even lower than they were.”
During his explosive “Meet the Press” interview on Sunday, Trump claimed that as soon as the Iran war is settled, “gasoline prices are going to drop like a rock.”
In May, he claimed the price of gas was “peanuts.” And in mid-April, Trump declared that the price of gas “hasn’t gone up as much as I thought.”
Just weeks after the Iran war started, in March, Trump said that gas prices “are gonna come tumbling down along with everything else” once the war is over.
Dale also found Trump frequently claims he saw the price of gas in Iowa hit $1.85.
“I was in Iowa, another place I like a lot, and it was just before we started the excursion to Iran. And we passed gas stations; it was $1.85 a gallon. And we’re going to get them down to those numbers again very quickly,” Trump said.
That trip to Iowa was in January, Dale notes, when the average price in the state was $2.57. Only a niche blend that is not for use in all cars hit $1.85.
Image via Reuters
President Donald Trump’s performance on Sunday’s “Meet the Press” — where he cut the interview short and blasted the moderator as “crooked” — was widely criticized, with many noticing his habit of attacking women reporters.
Among those who noticed was a resident in deep red Trump country: Florida’s The Villages, known as the “largest retirement community in the world,” where nearly seven out of 10 county residents voted for Trump in 2024. One resident recently told BBC News, “we’re as red as red gets.” Indeed, many residents travel in golf carts, often with Trump flags flying behind them.
In a letter to the editor in the Villages News, Edward McGinty wrote that he watched the president on “Meet the Press” and concluded that he is “a total embarrassment to this country.”
McGinty said that “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker is “a very intelligent woman who is very fair,” while “Trump is in the habit of calling people he disagrees with dumb and stupid, especially women reporters.”
McGinty asked: “When will they have the gumption to say back to him, ‘Hey buddy, there is a stupid person in this conversation and I am looking at him right now’?” He lamented that “they are afraid of losing their jobs or being banned from the White House press club.”
“It’s been 10 years since this low-IQ idiot, this con man, came down the golden escalator,” McGinty said of Trump. “That is plenty of time to know—even if you are the most dedicated Republican voter—that this guy is a con man who has no manners and no morals. The whole world is looking at the USA and thinking we have lost our minds, electing the man who tried to overthrow our democracy on Jan. 6, 2021.”
Indeed, as The Daily Beast reported in April, a “Gallup poll conducted in 2025 across more than 130 countries found median approval of U.S. leadership dropped from 39 percent in 2024 to 31 percent in 2025. At the same time, disapproval rose to a record-high 48 percent.” That poll was conducted before Trump’s war in Iran.
It also found that approval of American leadership “declined by 10 points or more in 44 countries between 2024 and 2025, with the steepest declines concentrated among U.S. allies, including many members of NATO,” according to The Daily Beast.
“I have said this many times before,” McGinty concluded. “If Donald had run as a Democrat or Independent, I would still be calling him a filthy pig just like his father. Of course, the MAGA voters will take his side. Why? Because they are exactly like him. People with no morals.”
Image via Reuters
Democrats Are Bleeding Voters in Dozens of Swing Districts: Report
Letter From Deep Red Trump Country Blasts President as ‘Low-IQ Idiot’
Hard-Right Groups Expanded Power Across the Trump Administration in 2025: Report
CNN Fact-Checker Scorches Trump Over the Price of Gas
Why Collins Isn’t Safe Even if Platner’s Campaign Implodes: Columnist
Hard-Right Groups Expanded Power Across the Trump Administration in 2025: Report
CNN Fact-Checker Scorches Trump Over the Price of Gas
Letter From Deep Red Trump Country Blasts President as ‘Low-IQ Idiot’
Why Collins Isn’t Safe Even if Platner’s Campaign Implodes: Columnist
Democrats Are Bleeding Voters in Dozens of Swing Districts: Report
News2 days ago‘Bunch of Lies’: CNN Fact-Checker Buries Trump’s Latest Whopper
News1 day agoSteve Schmidt Warns the Man With the Nuclear Codes Is ‘Psychologically Incontinent’
News1 day agoPentagon Backtracks After Mormon Anger — But Calls List of 211 Religions ‘Out-of-Control’
News2 days ago‘Coverup’: Kristol Says a Senate Vote on Blanche Should Be a Vote on Epstein
News2 days agoRetired Lt. General to Trump: Tell Troops Whether a Real Iran Plan Exists
News18 hours agoDemocrats Are Bleeding Voters in Dozens of Swing Districts: Report
News15 hours agoLetter From Deep Red Trump Country Blasts President as ‘Low-IQ Idiot’
News10 hours agoHard-Right Groups Expanded Power Across the Trump Administration in 2025: Report
