Connect with us

CPAC Is In Town And So Are The Anti-Gay-By-Day Attendees — And M4M Craigslist Ads



CPAC, the annual Conservative Political Action Committee, begins today in Washington, D.C. The conference boasts Rick Santorum, Tony Perkins, Sarah Palin, Donald Trump, Rand Paul, Ken Cuccinelli, and many other radical right wing “conservatives.”

One CPAC attendee this year, Cliff Kincaid, is urging CPAC to hold a panel to investigate the “dangers of the homosexual movement and why some of its members seem prone to violence, terror, and treason.”

Another CPAC attendee, World Net Daily founder, editor and CEO Joseph Farah, said same-sex marriage equality is “one of the most radical ideas considered since child sacrifice.”

CPAC of course hosts some of the nation’s biggest homophobes and professional anti-gay haters — some of whom of course are gay — and likely looking for anonymous sex.

“Looking to hook up with a closeted gay guy who works against equality back in his home town,” writes Phil Attey, an LGBT activist, on Facebook:

… a guy who regularly cheats on his wife at the gym sauna or through online hook ups … ready to screw up the lives of his small children who think the expensive presents he gives them are out of love and not guilt … willing to cause his entire family years of shame and pain when he makes his first mistake and gets caught?

We’ll here’s your chance!

CPAC is in town. This weekend at the Gaylord Hotel in National Harbor the nation’s most heinous of closeted gay men will assemble to speak out against gay rights and have as much anonymous gay sex as possible, before they have to head back home to kiss their wives and children (of course — presents in hand).

Attey points to Craigslist, an anonymous message board used around the world to sell used furniture, rent an apartment, find a job, or find love — or anonymous sex:

women seek women
women seeking men
men seeking women
men seeking men
misc romance
casual encounters

It’s the latter category that some CPACers, staying at the Gaylord Hotel in the National Harbor will be focusing on this weekend.

Here are a few excerpts from the local area around the CPAC convention’s M4M casual encounters section:

Have a hotel room? – m4m - 24 (National harbor)

hotel jack off national harbor – m4m - 42 (gaylord)

hotel jack off-national harbor – m4m - 42 (Gaylord)

Married and straight looking for first time – m4m - 37 (Alexandria)

National Harbor March 13-16 – m4m - 42 (National Harbor)

National Harbor March 13-16 – m4m - 42 (National Harbor)

Of course, we can’t be sure these are CPAC attendees… but it certainly sounds like it:

hotel jack off-national harbor – m4m – 42 (Gaylord)
42 year old WM looking for same or younger to meet up with after conference for a nice jack off. 185# 6′ , Be HWP –straight/bi
Location: Gaylord

CPAC has banned gay Republican groups, like GOProud, from its conference the past few years and features speakers, like Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association, who spend their days telling lies to demonize LGBT people.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.

NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.


Trump Lawyer’s ‘Critical Evidence’ Will Help DOJ Make Decision to Charge ‘Without Significant Delay’: Former Prosecutor



Donald Trump‘s attorney Evan Corcoran, who allegedly directed another Trump attorney to draft the false statement claiming all classified and sensitive documents had been returned, has been ordered to testify before a grand jury and hand over documents and records to Special Counsel Jack Smith in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents criminal investigation.

Trump appealed U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell’s decision ordering Corcoran to testify and hand over documents, including handwritten notes. The Appeals Court in light speed mode, rejected Trump’s appeal.

Corcoran will be testifying before the grand jury on Friday, CNN reports.

RELATED: ‘National Security Implications’: Former DOJ Official Speculates on Ruling Ordering Trump Attorney to Hand Over Docs

One former top DOJ official, Brandon Van Grack, says the “Special Counsel is about to get access to the most critical evidence in the case. Should allow DOJ to make a charging decision without significant delay.”

He did not define what “without significant delay” means in terms of days, weeks, or months.

Van Grack served at Main Justice for eleven years, including as a lead prosecutor in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, and later, as the Chief of the DOJ’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) Unit.

“The announcement from a panel of three judges in the appeals court – less than a day after Trump sought to put Corcoran’s testimony on hold – adds momentum to the special counsel investigation as it seeks to secure evidence that could make or break a federal criminal case against Trump,” CNN explains. “The Justice Department has successfully argued in court that prosecutors have enough evidence that Trump’s interactions with the lawyer were part of a possible crime that they can pierce the confidentiality of the conversations between the two.”

Continue Reading


‘National Security Implications’: Former DOJ Official Speculates on Ruling Ordering Trump Attorney to Hand Over Docs



A former top Dept. of Justice official says a federal judge’s expedited ruling ordering an attorney for Donald Trump to testify against his client before a grand jury and hand over documents very well may be related to “national security.”

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled that DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith had successfully made the case Donald Trump may have committed a crime, via his attorneys, in his classified documents case. That finding allowed her to invoke the crime-fraud exception, and order Trump attorney Evan Corcoran to testify before the grand jury investigating the ex-president’s unlawful retention and refusal to return hundreds of classified documents.

Former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann, who also worked for Special Counsel Robert Mueller and headed the DOJ’s Criminal Fraud Section, Wednesday afternoon on MSNBC said it’s possible Judge Howell’s expedited decisions were related to national security.

Tuesday night Judge Howell ordered DOJ to provide information by 6:00 AM Wednesday.

READ MORE: Jim Jordan’s Attack on Manhattan DA Will ‘Backfire’ and Allow Democrats to Expose Coordination With Trump: Columnist

Trump appealed Howell’s ruling, and Wednesday afternoon the Appeals Court denied his appeal related to the documents, Politico reports.

“I’ve never seen anything that quick. It’s very hard to know why. I have to say, to me, when I think about what can be a plausible reason– and this is pure speculation – is that there must be something in the papers that gave the judges concern about national security implications, because it’s such a short timeframe.”

“The reason this is a bombshell is you could end up with Evan Corcoran as a key, fundamental witness against Donald Trump in an obstruction of justice case and a false statements case,” Weissmann adds.

According to Politico, Wednesday’s appeals court ruling “effectively permits the Justice Department to circumvent Trump’s attorney-client privilege after a lower-court judge found that the documents likely contain evidence of a crime.”

NEW: Trump Lawyer’s ‘Critical Evidence’ Will Help DOJ Make Decision to Charge ‘Without Significant Delay’: Former Prosecutor


This article was updated to correctly spell Andrew Weissmann’s last name.

Continue Reading


Trump Appeals After Judge Agrees With Special Counsel on Crime-Fraud Exception and Requires His Attorney to Testify



Donald Trump’s attorneys have appealed a ruling that requires one of his lawyers to testify before a grand jury investigating his unlawful removal, retention, and refusal to return classified documents from the White House.

Attorneys for the Special Counsel “said there is evidence of a deliberate effort not to turn over all the material covered by the subpoena,” The Washington Post reports, citing people familiar with the matter.

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell had reportedly agreed with Special Counsel Smith that there is sufficient evidence proving Donald Trump may have committed a crime via his attorneys, and ruled his attorney must testify before a grand jury. The ruling, which was not made public, was handed down Friday night, NBC News reported Wednesday afternoon.

Judge Howell “ruled in favor of applying the ‘crime fraud’ exception to Trump’s attorney-client privilege and ordered Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran to testify before the federal grand jury.”

READ MORE: ‘On Standby’: Experts Say Manhattan Hush Money Grand Jury Delay ‘Not All That Surprising’

Trump’s attorneys have already appealed the ruling.

“People familiar with the matter said an appeals panel has already begun reviewing the decision, after Trump’s lawyers appealed,” The Washington Post adds. “The extraordinarily quick timeline suggests that the judges — all nominated by Democratic presidents — intend to rule swiftly.”

Trump could take his case all the way to the Supreme Court, but The Post says it’s “not clear he would have a much better chance of success there.”

According to an NBC News report from October, Corcoran directed another Trump attorney, Christina Bobb, to sign the letter claiming a thorough search of Mar-a-Lago had been made and all classified or “sensitive” documents had been returned. That was proven untrue after federal agents, executing a search warrant, recovered hundreds of documents with classified markings.

NEW: ‘National Security Implications’: Former DOJ Official Speculates on Ruling Ordering Trump Attorney to Hand Over Docs

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2020 AlterNet Media.