Conservative Admits DOMA Redefined Marriage, Says Taxpayers Will “Subsidize Same-Sex Marriage”
Martin Edward Whelan III, better known at the National Review as Ed Whelan, writes,
“If Congress had the authority to enact the federal statutory provisions that contain the words “marriage†and “spouse†… then surely it had the authority to define what those words mean in those federal statutory provisions.”
In other words, before the Defense of Marriage Act, marriage was not officially confined to a man and a woman, and DOMA redefined it.
He ends with this bit of zero-sum conservative (dare I say it?) voodoo-economics:
“What Massachusetts is really seeking, and what Touro is commanding, is that federal taxpayers subsidize same-sex marriage in Massachusetts.”
As if!
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |






















