Breaking: DOMA Ruled ‘Unconstitutional’ In Lesbian Estate Tax Case
DOMA has again been ruled unconstitutional by a federal court judge, this time in the heartbreaking case of Edie Windsor, who was fighting a $353,053 tax bill she received because her wife had died. The judge ordered a refund of of the taxes plus interest, noting “section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act … is unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiff.” This is the fifth federal court to strike down DOMA.
This case was particularly important, because Speaker of the House John Boehner‘s hand-picked lawyer, Paul Clement, fought the case as part of his $1.5 million retainer, and because Clement claimed Edie Windsor’s homosexuality was a “choice.” Also, the case demonstrates the personal impacts of DOMA, as Edith S. Windsor, the 83-year old widow of Thea C. Spyer, was forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in estate taxes, but had she been married to a man, there would have been no taxes on the estate. Stories like these, when related to ordinary Americans, help them understand why DOMA is wrong.
READ: What John Boehner’s House Is Saying — In Court — About Gay Homes
Section 3 of DOMA is particularly egregious, and was the cause of President Obama and Eric Holder’s decision to stop defending DOMA in court. Holder last year wrote:
The President has also concluded that Section 3 of DOMA, as applied to legally married same-sex couples, fails to meet that standard and is therefore unconstitutional. Given that conclusion, the President has instructed the Department not to defend the statute in such cases.
This is yet another case the BLAG and Paul Clement have lost, paid for with your tax dollars.
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi an other lawmakers have pleaded with Boehner to stop defending DOMA, as it gets ruled unconstitutional in every case, yet he refuses.
The ACLU adds:
Windsor and Spyer were married in Canada in 2007, and were considered married by their home state of New York.
“Thea and I shared our lives together for 44 years, and I miss her each and every day,†said Windsor. “It’s thrilling to have a court finally recognize how unfair it is for the government to have treated us as though we were strangers.â€
In her lawsuit, Windsor argues that DOMA violates the equal protection guarantee of the U.S. Constitution because it requires the government to treat same-sex couples who are legally married as though they were not, in fact, married.
…
When Thea Spyer died in 2009, she left all of her property to Windsor, including the apartment they shared. Because they were married, Spyer’s estate normally would have passed to her spouse without any estate tax. But because DOMA prevents recognition of the otherwise valid marriages of same-sex couples, Windsor had to pay more than $363,000 in federal estate taxes.
“This decision adds to what has become an avalanche of decisions that DOMA can’t survive even the lowest level of scrutiny by the courts,†said James Esseks, director of the ACLU Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Project.
Windsor, a senior computer systems programmer, and Spyer, a clinical psychologist, met in the early 1960s, and lived together for more than four decades in Greenwich Village. Despite not being able to get legally married, they were engaged to each other in 1967. Spyer was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, and Windsor helped her through her long battle with the disease. They were finally legally married in May 2007.
Read the actual court decision here.
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.