Breaking: Anti-Gay Texas Councilwoman Elisa Chan Target Of Ethics Charges From Secret Audio
The San Antonio, Texas city councilwoman whose secretly recorded staff meeting revealed her virulently anti-gay and anti-transgender views is now the target of ethics charges based on her comments at that May 21 meeting. Elisa Chan has been charged with ethics violations by a local citizen and Democratic consultant who filed a complaint as a direct result of the may 21 recording that shows Chan disparaging LGBT people and using her tax-payer paid staff and office for political purposes — a direct violation of San Antonio city council rules.
Democratic campaign consultant D’mitri Kosub’s complaint includes the allegation “that a partisan political purpose was served because the discussion focused on how statements, actions, or policy administered by the office would be received by the partisan political group of voters who participate in the Republican primary or those voters who the councilwoman perceives constitute her partisan political base.”
Chan had said she believes homosexuality is a choice, that gay people “take hormone shots,†and that gay people should be “banned†from adopting or raising children. Chan also attacked the marriage of a former city councilwoman whose legal wife is a transgender woman. In a release of additional audio, Chan can be heard gossiping about the former councilwoman, and asking, “So what kind of marriage is that?”
Throughout the audio, Chan and her staff are heard debating and strategizing on how best to vote against a proposed anti-discrimination ordinance. At one point, Chan staffs out a draft of an op-ed — that would bear her name — to be published in a local paper, explaining why she opposes the ordinance. She can be heard saying that if it isn’t well-receioved, she can pretend she did not know what “transgender” is, and claim she later looked it up in Wikipedia if she needed to apologize after it’s run.
“When taken together, these statements indicate that the May 21, 2013, staff meeting was conducted for the partisan political purpose of preparing statements and policy to specifically appeal to potential voters in an upcoming Republican primary,†the complaint also states.
“But once a representative is elected and sent to do business on behalf of all constituents,” D’mitri Kosub told Texas Public Radio, “I think that it’s really important that they work very hard to avoid even the appearance of bias or favortism, and that rather than working for just their small partisan political constituency, that they work for the district that they were elected to represent as a whole.”
The local paper that broke the story with the secret audio recordings, San Antonio Express-News, explains that the “administrative directive that Kosub says Chan violated prohibits political activity by city employees.”
It prohibits “the use of public employees and city resources for political purposes, and to avoid any appearance of bias or favoritism in carrying out public policy.â€
In his complaint, Kosub accuses Chan of engaging her city staff during city time, on city property, for a political purpose.
He also alleges Chan “failed to avoid the appearance of bias and/or favoritism by allowing the discussion to focus on appealing to her political, voting base.â€
Chan is rumored to be considering a state Senate run. An opinion piece in the San Antonio Current looks at her chances: “Will Anti-LGBT Remarks Hurt Chan’s Shot At The Texas Senate? Probably Not.”
Â
Related:
Breaking: New Audio Reveals San Antonio Councilwoman Attacking Transgender Woman’s Marriage
Don’t Worry, San Antonio, Homophobic Councilwoman Chan Has Gay Friends And Even Hugs Them
Breaking: San Antonio Anti-Gay Lawmaker Refuses To Resign, Recuse From Anti-Discrimination Bill
GetEQUAL Texas Issues Travel Alert For LGBT Travelers To San Antonio
TX Councilwoman Defends Leaked Homophobic Comments As Her ‘First Amendment’ Right
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.