Andrew Sullivan And George Will: Wrong On California’s Gay Marriage
“The much narrower victory of Proposition 8 suggests that minds are moving toward toleration of same-sex marriage. If advocates of that have the patience required by democratic persuasion, California’s ongoing conversation may end as they hope. If, however, the conversation is truncated, as Brown urges, by judicial fiat, the argument will become as embittered as the argument about abortion has been by judicial highhandedness.”
Andrew Sullivan on George Will on Prop 8:
“I’m emotionally conflicted on this. As someone who has spent much of my adult life making the case for gay equality and for civil marriage as the sine qua non of such equality, I’d love marriage to be real in California for all Californians. But intellectually, I’m not conflicted. I’m with George.”
Here’s why George Will, and by extension, Andrew Sullivan, are wrong: It’s the wrong comparison. Will is putting gay marriage in the same arena as abortion. Thinking that it is makes it so, and it’s not. Roe vs. Wade ensured abortion became a civil rights decision, but it is far too entrenched in religion and what some see as morality. Gay marriage, while some would have us believe it is a religious or morality issue, is far more of a civil rights issue, and there are much better arguments for it living there. The best comparison, and most similar argument? Interracial marriage: Loving vs. Virginia.
I don’t for a moment suggest that gay marriage or abortion are validly anything except civil rights issues. Religion has no bearing on the laws in this country, nor should it.Â
Moving the argument away from religion and into the civil rights arena, which is where it should live, makes the “Loving” comparison more applicable. Which then takes the argument to the logical conclusion of now. Gay marriage, same-sex marriage is a civil rights issue. George Will would have us be “patient.” Or, as I’ve called it, “tolerant.”
But as I wrote a few months ago in “Defending Your Life #1: Majority Rules?“,Â
“Attorney Evan Wolfson, who is the founder of Freedom To Marry, and wrote “Why Marriage Matters  makes some compelling arguments for marriage, including this one:
Right now, across the country, there’s about a 50-50 split on making gay marriage legal. In 1967, forty-two years ago, there was a 70-30 split against making interracial marriage legal. We’ve waited long enough. The longer we wait, the greater strength the Right will have to do what they did in California: out-maneuver and out-spend us. The time is now. The time is right, and so is gay marriage.

Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.
![]() |