• Source: Omaha World-Herald
  • WATCH: Omaha Parents Say LGBT-Inclusive Sex Ed 'Rapes Students Of Their Innocence'

    Opponents of New Curriculum Compare Lessons on Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity to Giving Kids Alcohol

    LGBT-inclusive sex education "rapes children of their innocence" and is comparable to giving alcoholics booze, according to parents who spoke Monday during a three-hour debate over proposed new curriculum standards in Omaha, Nebraska. 

    The proposed standards, which represent Omaha Public Schools' first attempt to revise its sex ed curriculum in 30 years, include lessons about LGBT issues, social media, bullying and sexual harassment, according to a report in The Washington Post. They also initially included information about contraception and abortion, but that was removed after more than 1,000 people showed up at a community forum in October. 

    At that meeting, one parent dubbed "puritymom" stood and screamed at OPS educators during the meeting. "It’s my daughter! My daughter! Who’s going to keep her pure? Nobody! I am! Not OPS! Not OPS!," she screamed.

    Needless to say, the district's removal of abortion and contraception from the proposed sex-ed standards wasn't enough to satisfy some parents, even though related courses are not required and they can opt their children out of them.  

    Kathryn Russell, a Catholic mother, grandmother and former school employee, told board members that its vote on the new standards, expected to take place Jan. 20, is a "political" and "moral" one, not an educational one.

    "I hope you are working from a Bible that is worn out," Russell said. "You will someday be judged. We will all be judged when we meet God. And I’d like for God to look at you and say, 'You've been a good and faithful servants. You have taken children, you’ve taken others to heaven.' That’s what we’re here for. Yes, we need to give children an education, but the curriculum that you have, the standards that you have, gives too much information. It rapes children of their innocence." 

    Raleigh Welsh, a sophomore at the Omaha's Central High, had the perfect response for Russell.

    "Innocence is not the same as ignorance," Welsh said. "Ignorant decisions are due to a lack of information."

    Welsh told the board that she and her peers deserve accurate information so they can make educated decisions. 

    "Every person, regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation and gender identity, has a right to accurate sexual education," she said. 

    According to The Omaha World-Herald, 25 people spoke against the new standards and 15 spoke in favor of them. The school board's meeting room, with a capacity of 350, was full. 

    Chris Rodgers, president of the Douglas County Board of Health, spoke in support of the standards, saying Omaha is currently experiencing an "epidemic" of sexually transmitted diseases.

    "If you all step up and approve this, we will move light years forward in addressing STDs and a whole lot of other sexual issues going on here in this county," Douglas said. 

    Gwen Easter, of Omaha, said teaching sex ed to help children make healthy choices is akin to giving them a beer to teach them not to drink, the WaPo reported. 

    “Are you going to give them a bottle of alcohol to help with alcoholism? No, you’re not going to do that,” Easter said. “Y’all need to stop with all this hidden agenda stuff.”

    "Kids have had sex for years and years, and y'all say it’s not going to change anything," Easter said. "What you guys are wanting to do is talk about homosexuality and masturbation and all these things to kids. That’s the real agenda that Omaha Public Schools is pushing, the same-sex stuff."

    In fact, Omaha's curriculum for "Human Growth and Development" already includes "preventing alcohol and chemical abuse," according to responses to FAQs about sex ed posted online by the district

    The new standards would continue to encourage sexual abstinence, but middle schools students would learn about LGBT issues, including that "all individuals are worthy and should be treated with dignity and respect." High school students, meanwhile, would learn that “gender identity refers to a person’s internal sense of self as male, female, both or neither.”

    The anti-LGBT group Save Nebraska’s Children, which is fighting the standards, claims they would be “full of pornographic content promoting homosexual lifestyles, masturbation, and sexually graphic images.”

    But according to the district's responses to the FAQs, students will "absolutely not" be shown pornography. The document also stresses that the district will not hand out contraceptives or take students to get abortions.

    "LGBTQ topics of discussion proposed in grades 7th and 8th will center on teaching individuals to be respectful of one another, even if ideas and beliefs are different from personal beliefs," the document states. "A family will be defined by saying, 'There are many different types of families and they serve many functions such as love and affection, education, economic support, protection, guidance and socialization.'"

    Watch a clip featuring Russell and Welsh's comments, above, as well as video of the full meeting, below.

     

    Image: Screenshot via Livewell Nebraska/Omaha World Herald

    Get weekly news & updates
    Subscribe
    Support our work DONATE



    Register to VOTE

    Showing 4 comments

    Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

    • commented 2016-01-09 01:31:19 -0500
      I offer you Omahains a formal,invitation to join the human race in the year 2016. Somehow it seems you were left without human decency AND left back in the 1700s. Time to grow a,heart and time travel.

    • commented 2016-01-08 04:09:52 -0500
      Some people simply mistake innocence for ignorance.

      Only one of those will put you in peril.

    • commented 2016-01-08 00:28:01 -0500
      The “Innocence” that these people are proposing doesn’t exist. Children learn about sex far earlier than they believe, no matter how tight of a control they think they have on the available material. If a child is interested in the subject, they WILL find a way to get that information one way or another. It’s best that they learn about the material in a safe and healthy environment rather than be forced to try discovering it for themselves.

      In a more direct response to the complaints, the analogies they’re trying to make don’t work.. The school doesn’t force a cigarette in their mouths, a bottle of beer in their hands to teach them the dangers of these two, and they aren’t going to force the children to have sex in order to teach them about that. It’s ludicrous fear-mongering in an attempt to oppose the teaching of something that they personally (or religiously) don’t approve of, which is no different from the arguments against teaching evolution, black history or other religions.

    • commented 2016-01-07 22:29:10 -0500
      This is the exact definition of retarded. They haven’t the brain capacity to function as an adult in society. They are a danger to themselves and to others and should be locked away for the good of everyone.

    Your rights, your movement.
    Join today:
    Your rights, your movement.
    Join today: