White House Not Planning For Supreme Court Ruling Against Historic Same-Sex Marriage Case (Video)
The White House today says it has “a lot of confidence” in the arguments it made before the Supreme Court in the historic same-sex marriage case.
Press Secretary Josh Earnest today said the White House has no contingency plans for a negative ruling from the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage. Justices heard oral arguments April 28, and a ruling is expected any day, most likely before the end of the month.
“At this point, we continue to have a lot of confidence in the legal arguments presented by the solicitor general with regard to this matter, and I’m not aware of any contingency planning that’s ongoing at this point,†Earnest told Washington Blade Chief Political & White House reporter Chris Johnson.
The court could find all state bans against same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional, or it could uphold them, forcing thousands of legally married couples into a legal limbo. Ultimately, it is believed a ruling opposing same-sex marriage, one that supports the state marriage bans, would still allow those couples who married when they were struck down to retain their marital status.
Another issue, as Johnson mentioned in his question (video, above, beginning at the 59:07 mark), is place of celebration versus place of residence. Currently, some federal benefits are legally tied to the state in which a same-sex couple resides, whereas other federal questions are tied to the state in which the couple married. For example, a same-sex couple who married in Massachusetts but resides in Texas could not access federal social security and veterans benefits because Texas does not recognize their marriage.
Earlier this month, Senate Republicans killed a bill that would have ensured same-sex married veterans and their families could access those benefits.
Â
Image: Screenshot via C-SPAN
Hat tip:Â Washington Blade
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.