Trump Has Signed New Muslim Travel Ban. Ten Things You Should Know.
It Is Still a Muslim Ban.
President Donald Trump Monday morning signed his revised Muslim travel ban executive order. Here are 10 things you should know about it:
- The Dept. of Homeland Security produced a document that strikes down the entire basis for Trump’s ban. As MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow reported exclusively last week, a Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment document “from the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, makes the case that most foreign-born, U.S.-based violent extremists are likely not radicalized when they come to the U.S., but rather become radicalized after living in the U.S. for a number of years.” That assessment tracked “88 violent, foreign-born extremists in the United States. More than half of them had been in the U.S. more than 10 years before they were indicted or killed.”
- The new ban narrows the number of countries from seven to 6, excluding Iraq.
- The new ban no longer provides a preference for Christians to be allowed in to the country. The wording from the original ban mentioned “minority religions” in those seven countires, and Trump had specifically said he wanted to protect Christians.
- The ban leaves out green card holdrers, a major problem that cropped up almost immediately when Trump’s original ban was signed.
- This new ban does not go into effect until March 16.
- The Trump administration went to great lengths to try to craft the new document to ensure the courts do not see it as an unconstitutional Muslim ban.
Hey look what’s still on Trump’s website https://t.co/y1gWLQMV9a pic.twitter.com/ILAbDMMeR6
— Brian Tashman (@briantashman) March 6, 2017
But Trump has previously talked about it as a Muslim ban. As People for the American Way’s Brian Tashman notes, Trump’s original call for a Muslim ban is still on his website. On Dec. 7, 2015, Trump had said: “Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what the hell is going on.”
- There has been no post-9/11 attack on U.S. soil by anyone from these six countries:
Sessions notes post-9/11 terrorism to defend new ban—but no attacker in US from 9/11→ now is from 6 banned countries https://t.co/lmgxXiW6pl pic.twitter.com/WzowQV3ykM
— Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy) March 6, 2017Â
- The administration states it will produce reports on the ban every six months, allowing them to include more countries if they deem necessary.
- In a nutshell, this is the Trump administration’s reasoning for the ban: “until the assessment of current screening and vetting procedures required by section 2 of this order is completed, the risk of erroneously permitting entry of a national of one of these countries who intends to commit terrorist acts or otherwise harm the national security of the United States is unacceptably high. Accordingly, while that assessment is ongoing, I am imposing a temporary pause on the entry of nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, subject to categorical exceptions and case-by-case waivers, as described in section 3 of this order.”
- Basically, it says, refugees need not apply: “The Secretary of State shall suspend travel of refugees into the United States under the USRAP [U.S. Refugees Admissions Program], and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall suspend decisions on applications for refugee status, for 120 days after the effective date of this order, subject to waivers pursuant to subsection (c) of this section.”
Extra: It is still a Muslim ban. Via ACLU, which has been fighting the administration in court:
One more time for the people in the back (and for @realDonaldTrump). #nomuslimban #muslimban #muslimban2 pic.twitter.com/V6O8LboC3d
— ACLU National (@ACLU) March 6, 2017
Extra extra: Trump signed it privately, no media or press present.
Pres. Trump just signed revised version of travel ban EO. Key difference this time? No cameras present. Also: no open press events today.
— Monica Alba (@albamonica) March 6, 2017
More:
Trump’s new ban, like his old ban, is a policy in search of a justification.
— Laila Lalami (@LailaLalami) March 6, 2017
UPDATE:
Washington Post foreign affairs writer Ishaan Tharoor†makes some excellent points via Twitter:
3. Refugees, in particular, go through incredible amounts of vetting.
4. Suspending resettlement demonizes refugees.— Ishaan Tharoor (@ishaantharoor) March 6, 2017
7. In fact, since the late 1980s, all have been hit militarily by the US.
8. If Trump WH could widen the net right now, it would.— Ishaan Tharoor (@ishaantharoor) March 6, 2017
Â
Â
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.