Ted Cruz Under Fire For Failure To Disclose $1 Million In Loans From Goldman Sachs, CitiBank
Would $1 million make a difference in winning or losing a Senate campaign? Does it matter who provided $1 million in loans?
For his 2012 race to win a U.S. Senate seat, former Texas Solicitor General Ted Cruz took $1 million in loans from his wife’s employer, the investment banking firm Goldman Sachs, and from CitiBank. But contrary to federal campaign finance laws and to his repeatedly-shared story of personal family sacrifice, Cruz did not disclose the loans to the Federal Election Commission nor to voters, The New York Times reports Wednesday evening.
“Sweetheart, I’d like us to liquidate our entire net worth, liquid net worth, and put it into the campaign,†Cruz repeatedly said he told his wife, bragging how she believed in him so much it took her just seconds to agree.
Cruz, an attorney working for a private Houston law firm in 2012, “put ‘personal funds’ totaling $960,000 into his Senate campaign,” the Times reports. “Two months later, shortly before a scheduled runoff election, he added more, bringing the total to $1.2 million — ‘which is all we had saved,’ as Mr. Cruz described it in an interview with The New York Times several years ago.”
The Times adds, “in the first half of 2012, Ted and Heidi Cruz obtained the low-interest loan from Goldman Sachs, as well as another one from Citibank. The loans totaled as much as $750,000 and eventually increased to a maximum of $1 million before being paid down later that year. There is no explanation of their purpose.”
No mention of the loans appears on reports the Ted Cruz for Senate Committee filed with the Federal Election Commission.
The penalty for non-disclosure could be fines and a Senate ethics investigation, but also a sense of distrust from potential voters.
A Cruz spokeserson labeled the non-disclosure as merely “inadvertent.”
Cruz won his 2012 Senate race. That’s him in the photo above, with his wife Heidi on the right, thanking supporters on that Election Day evening.Â
Here’s how some are responding on Twitter:
Ted’s not a corrupt bankster. He’s just married to one. Totally different. Also, he’s running against Wall Street. https://t.co/1Yli76rUlY
— John Schindler (@20committee) January 14, 2016
Ted Cruz is a jerk – and he’s also a liar, bought and paid-for by Wall St bankers Goldman Sachs. And a jerk. https://t.co/Y3rzagaspn
— Van Badham (@vanbadham) January 13, 2016
Wait. You mean to tell me @tedcruz is a liar and would be an awful president? Quelle surprise! https://t.co/Qh9UVQ1COG
— Marc (@themarc) January 14, 2016
Ted Cruz is quite literally the senator from Goldman Sachs. Well played, Tea Party! (Oh, and: #captainrenault) https://t.co/CQP9aEKff9
— Dan Murphy (@bungdan) January 14, 2016
Ted Cruz was literally brought to you by Goldman Sachs. https://t.co/KhKSNGby62
— Ali Gharib (@Ali_Gharib) January 14, 2016
#Hypocrisy @tedcruz rails against big #banks while taking cheap loan fr #GoldmanSachs to fund his 2012 senate #campaign dishonest politician
— Steven Polakoff (@Buzznyc) January 14, 2016
What a devious liar. #TedCruz Hypocritical. Politically parasitic. Beware. https://t.co/2864xPfWqr
— Joshua Williams (@joshuaNYCwill) January 14, 2016
Wall Street Loan Helped Ease Ted Cruz’s Senate Bid in 2012, via @nytimes; Cruz, just another sleazy Wall Streeter🤑 https://t.co/V4GcuKfGkg
— Richard Friedman (@rcfwilmette) January 13, 2016
Ted Cruz Didn’t Disclose Loan From Goldman Sachs for His First Senate Campaign NYT. Can’t be trusted, dishonest https://t.co/lrTQjzAZfx
— Diane Rogers Fourny (@drfourny) January 14, 2016
Fine line between being a liar & the inconvenient truth ~Wall Street Loan Helped Ease Ted Cruz’s Senate Bid in 2012 https://t.co/XG2vAk5UVr
— ahtrinibabe (@ahtrinibabe) January 14, 2016
Â
This article has been updated for clarity.
Image via FacebookÂ
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.