Right-Wing Blogger Publishes Unconfirmed Identity Of Victim In Rolling Stone UVA Rape Story
A controversial, conservative right wing blogger today published what he says is the name of the “girl” in Rolling Stone’s controversial UVA gang rape story – and then fundraises off it.
Editor’s note: There’s no image at the top of the page because frankly, there’s no image that accurately reflects the extreme of this story.
In journalism, there are some lines that should not be crossed.Â
Today, conservative blogger Charles C. Johnson, who runs the site GotNews.com, published the full name of the woman he claims is the subject of a Rolling Stone story about gang rape at the University of Virginia.
The facts in that story are now in dispute, and Rolling Stone has issued a statement detailing and acknowledging discrepancies in its story. Those discrepancies however do not mean that the subject in the story, which Rolling Stone identified only as “Jackie,” was lying about being raped, or was not telling the truth about the most important issues of the story. It does not mean the rape did not happen – nor will we litigate that on these pages now, and nor are we in a position to.
@ClaraJeffery I wrote about this point for @YahooHealth. The effects of trauma on memory are REAL: https://t.co/9xGfBP8Gpe
— Jen Gerson Uffalussy (@jennyalyse) December 7, 2014
Johnson, however, saw fit to publish the name of the person he claims is “Jackie.” We will not publish that name here, nor will we link to his site or story.
In typical self-aggrandizing-and-victim-shaming form, this is the title of his piece: “BREAKING: GotNews.com Found Name of Rape #UVAHoax ‘Jackie.'”
Also included in Johnson’s article is a photo allegedly of “Jackie,” and even the names of her brothers, linking to a recent family obituary. He also published the city and state where she allegedly lives or is from.
“Multiple sources are confirming to GotNews.com,” he writes, that [we will not publish her name] is the girl who was the Rolling Stone reporter’s source.”
Notice he calls her a “girl.”
Johnson is also fundraising off the publication of her alleged identity, in a tweet with the victim’s name.
Little Green Footballs, which has been reporting on Charles C. Johnson’s antics for a while now, writes that Johnson is “threatening” the woman identified as “Jackie.”
LGF posts this tweet of Johnson’s:
I’m giving Jackie until later tonight to tell the truth and then I’m going to start revealing everything about her past.
— Charles C. Johnson (@ChuckCJohnson) December 7, 2014
And adds:
That’s not journalism — it’s extortion. It’s a clear violation of Twitter’s rules to post this kind of information, and reckless endangerment to boot. And we should point out that it has not been proven that “Jackie’s†story was false; Chuck is posting the name of a woman who may very well be a rape victim (if he even has the right person at all).
Jezebel notes that the “only purpose releasing her name could possibly serve is justifying the already prominent and twisted desire to doggedly discredit victims of sexual assault. It only encourages those who define sexual assault as ‘crying rape.'”
Most importantly, publishing the real name is fucking dangerous. If Johnson is correct, he has put a young woman who has already been subjected to hatred and threats at even more risk.
And if he is not correct? Just as dangerous.
This is by far the most horrible thing I have ever read on twitter, and I’ve seen a lot of bad shit on here. pic.twitter.com/wqqt8QXvYg
— Max Fisher (@Max_Fisher) December 7, 2014
Needless to say, social media is rightly furious about this.
I, Chuck Johnson, hereby accept your nomination for World’s Biggest Piece of Shit http://t.co/fMUTiESozT
— Simon Owens (@simonowens) December 7, 2014
Johnson wouldn’t do what he does if some dark corner of the Internet wasn’t enthusiastically cheering him on.
— Ujamaadam Serwer (@AdamSerwer) December 7, 2014
Some organization should help Jackie sue this assclown, just to deter other assclowns. RE https://t.co/dkLxaoD8Xn
— Shoq (@Shoq) December 7, 2014
oh look blogger Chuck C. Johnson, while being cheered on by the likes of Roosh and Matt Forney, is doxxing the UVA rape victim
— Matt Binder (@MattBinder) December 7, 2014
.@ChuckCJohnson I think you may be confusing “nerd” with “sociopath”
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) December 7, 2014
I’m not sure what disturbs me more, that Chuck Johnson does what he does, or that thousands of people cheer him on and defend him.
— Simon Owens (@simonowens) December 7, 2014
Like pundits on both sides fling a lot of mud, but Chuck Johnson represents a much darker realm of humanity.
— Simon Owens (@simonowens) December 7, 2014
This is called extortion: http://t.co/pMxYtFlonn via @mediaite
— john manly (@johnmanly) December 7, 2014
Even those on the right aren’t happy.
Let me just say it plainly, this type of bullshit makes me sick and we don’t need it on our side @ChuckCJohnson pic.twitter.com/i3MgvMuAzl
— DanRiehl (@DanRiehl) December 7, 2014
Â
Â
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.