Australia: Senate To Finally Vote On Same-Sex Marriage Bill Amid Complicated Political Conditions
Same-Sex Marriage in Australia? It’s Complicated.
64 percent of all Australians support same-sex marriage. The prime minister of Australia supports same-sex marriage. Both the Labor and the Green parties support same-sex marriage.Â
Seems like a no-brainer, right? Pass it into law and move on.
Not so fast.
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull (photo) supports marriage equality but insists the citizens of Australia should vote on it – despite years of polls that show strong majority support, even among people of faith. That vote, a new report shows, would cost nearly $400 million (US) in both actual costs and related economic costs, including lost productivity and emotional impact.
And Turnbull, head of the Liberal Party, refuses to let members of his party vote in favor of same-sex marriage because he’s insistent on a national plebiscite.Â
On Thursday, however, the Australian Senate is expected to vote on a bill to extend marriage to same-sex couples.
Sounds like a promising step forward, right?
“Even if passed, the proposal will go nowhere as the government will use its House of Representatives numbers to negate the Senate vote, and proceed with its policy of a plebiscite after the next election,” Australia’s news.com.au reports.Â
“And a big defeat of the motion, with Labor senators using a free vote, could damage the broad campaign for same-sex marriage.”
Additionally, in Australia, lawmakers are not always allowed a “conscience vote,” meaning they can be obligated to vote as their party instructs.
In short, it’s complicated, and it looks for now like some politicians are forgetting that marriage is about family, and they’re standing in the way of the civil rights of same-sex couples.
Some responses via Twitter:
Underwhelmed gay marriage is being used today YET AGAIN as a football by Australia’s politicians. Stop kicking the crap out of us. #auspol
— Luke Miller (@dodgyville) March 15, 2016
Will @TurnbullMalcolm allow senators a #freevote on #marriageequality on Thursday?
— Prof Kerryn Phelps (@drkerrynphelps) March 15, 2016
Tell your MP that #MarriageEquality only needs a #FreeVote. #auspol We’ll save millions – whatever the amount! https://t.co/GnMzLdJAQ0
— Beau Newell (@beauadam6) March 15, 2016
I DON’T WANT PEOPLE VOTING ON MY RIGHTS @PatsKarvelas @RNDrive. SIMPLY NO!!!!! #freevote #noplebiscite
— Michael Barnett (@mikeybear) March 14, 2016
Sadly I fear this is true – no plebiscite please @TurnbullMalcolm – for our kids sake #freevote #lovemakesafamily https://t.co/7X5xsRHIjy
— Felicity Marlowe (@FelicityMarlowe) March 10, 2016
Improbably, a good meme. pic.twitter.com/kQEoasHwjP
— Paul Kidd (@paulkidd) March 15, 2016
Will @TurnbullMalcolm allow senators a #freevote on #marriageequality on Thursday?
— Prof Kerryn Phelps (@drkerrynphelps) March 15, 2016
Over 100+ years Australia has only had two plebiscites #freevote #marriageequality2016 @TurnbullMalcolm | @AuSenate pic.twitter.com/jcqZO7pUSw
— UQ Pride Alliance (@PrideUq) March 15, 2016
Â
Image by US Department of Defense via WikimediaÂ
Â
Â
Â
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. The New Civil Rights Movement depends on readers like you to meet our ongoing expenses and continue producing quality progressive journalism. Three Silicon Valley giants consume 70 percent of all online advertising dollars, so we need your help to continue doing what we do.
NCRM is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. From unflinching coverage of religious extremism, to spotlighting efforts to roll back our rights, NCRM continues to speak truth to power. America needs independent voices like NCRM to be sure no one is forgotten.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure NCRM remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to NCRM, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.